Saturday Racing
- heinrich
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2534
- Thanks: 375
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Saturday Racing
13 years 9 months ago
They backed Lancelin( Stable companion 6Kgs out at the weights ) like they knew the result ,and Castlethorpe lost 5 lengths at the gate......lol
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Chris van Buuren
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9804
- Thanks: 202
Re: Re: Saturday Racing
13 years 9 months ago
rob faux Wrote:
> They backed Lancelin( Stable companion 6Kgs out at
> the weights ) like they knew the result ,and
> Castlethorpe lost 5 lengths at the gate......lol
Mike Bass did say on his website that Castlethorpe will need it and that Lancelin should be the better over this trip and course.
Guess they didn't try and play funny buggers with their comments? they pulled a rope a dope. Made you think they could be pulling a fast one with lancelin, then they said it was their best, they backed it and they made it happen......
Clever boys!
> They backed Lancelin( Stable companion 6Kgs out at
> the weights ) like they knew the result ,and
> Castlethorpe lost 5 lengths at the gate......lol
Mike Bass did say on his website that Castlethorpe will need it and that Lancelin should be the better over this trip and course.
Guess they didn't try and play funny buggers with their comments? they pulled a rope a dope. Made you think they could be pulling a fast one with lancelin, then they said it was their best, they backed it and they made it happen......

Clever boys!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsellus Wallace
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3350
- Thanks: 140
Re: Re: Saturday Racing
13 years 9 months ago
gregbucks Wrote:
> rob faux Wrote:
>
>
> > What a coincidence....the betting patterns
> > suggested Castlethorpe might be "unlucky" in
> that
> > race.
>
> I only saw the last 400 metres, what happened?
fluffed the start
> rob faux Wrote:
>
>
> > What a coincidence....the betting patterns
> > suggested Castlethorpe might be "unlucky" in
> that
> > race.
>
> I only saw the last 400 metres, what happened?
fluffed the start
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Phil
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Saturday Racing
13 years 9 months ago
gregbucks Wrote:
> Brandy Nan for Striker.... Stand in the Q(
DID SHE GET THERE??????????
> Brandy Nan for Striker.... Stand in the Q(

DID SHE GET THERE??????????
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Guest
-
- Visitor
-
Re: Re: Saturday Racing
13 years 9 months ago
rob faux Wrote:
> They backed Lancelin( Stable companion 6Kgs out at
> the weights ) like they knew the result ,and
> Castlethorpe lost 5 lengths at the gate......lol
Reminds me about the other thread on this site.
..............now, now you don't start EAST ....LOL
Seriously, Bass did make Lancelin the better one on the day
> They backed Lancelin( Stable companion 6Kgs out at
> the weights ) like they knew the result ,and
> Castlethorpe lost 5 lengths at the gate......lol
Reminds me about the other thread on this site.
..............now, now you don't start EAST ....LOL
Seriously, Bass did make Lancelin the better one on the day
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Phil
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Saturday Racing
13 years 9 months ago
None of that explains why, Castlethorpe needed to get left otherwise it would still have shat in!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.149 seconds