Saurez lol

Could not have happened to a better club


Btw at least you never walk alone, I don't think he can eat 2 whole people.....

He also has to wear a muzzle when out in public...

What the legendary Bill Shankly built, this clown has destroyed, it amazes me how some liverpool supporters and players can argue for him.

What a joke....

I agree he should be banned but 10 games..come on okes??

Suarez gets 10 games for biting
Defoe gets 0 games for biting
The FA sees a yellow card in 2003 for Defoe as sufficient punishment but in 2013 its 10games???
Suarez racism 8games ban
Terry racism 4games ban

Wouldn't blame Suarez if he left now...

I started disliking him when he celebrated in the World Cup when he handled the ball on the goal line and Ghana missed that penalty.

gordo Wrote:

---

> What a joke....
>
> I agree he should be banned but 10 games..come on
> okes??
>
> Suarez gets 10 games for biting
> Defoe gets 0 games for biting
> The FA sees a yellow card in 2003 for Defoe as
> sufficient punishment but in 2013 its 10games???
> Suarez racism 8games ban
> Terry racism 4games ban
>
> Wouldn't blame Suarez if he left now...

You have missed something important.

Only 3 games more than his first ban for biting. If he didnt learn from that, what makes you think his going to learn from a 10 match ban.

SORTED

gordo Wrote:

---

> What a joke....
> ed
> I agree he should be banned but 10 games..come on
> okes??
>
> Suarez gets 10 games for biting
> Defoe gets 0 games for biting
> The FA sees a yellow card in 2003 for Defoe as
> sufficient punishment but in 2013 its 10games???
> Suarez racism 8games ban
> Terry racism 4games ban
>
> Wouldn't blame Suarez if he left now...


Gordon,it's a stupid rule
If the ref is deemed to have seen the event,as in Defoes case and takes action(yellow card) they do nothing.
If the ref missed it as in Suarez case,they take retrospective action..

Now in the Defoe case,the ref must have made a mistake in what he actually saw.
If the ref had thought Suarez pushed or tripped Ivanovich and booked him,the Football Associatio would have done nothing.
He would have got away with it like Defoe did.

Rule my butt, they were gna ban Suarez whether he got booked by the ref or not. Just so that RVP would win the golden boot..even the FA plays 4 Man U..bullshit, surely cudve started ban next season as well. Certain rules are only followed 4 certain player. I dnt warrant wt he did, but 2 players gtng different bans 4 similar instances-just coz the ref yellow carded one n not the other is a kuk rule that wouldve never been implented if some other player ws involved. IMO

DTF is 100% correct on the reasoning why Defoe was not banned and why Saurez was.

@Dave, my rantings and raving wasn't targetted at ur response,as CnC said u r 100% correct.
Ijust pissed of we dnt hv a fight for the golden boot award, as it ws going down to the wire