Kenilworth Tuesday 9/7/13

Not often is get 2 year old races right but 2nd Marshall runners formline far stronger imo

i only placed bets from race 4, 1st 3 races are landmines for a man of my calibre.

saldiani Wrote:

---

> i do not want to sound like a typical
> conspiracy-theory-man, but how could this be, that
> on the marshall-horse with the better jock on, is
> offered a lot of money by a layer on betfair
> meanwhile very little on the marshall horsewith
> the "second" jock. and then very clearly comesout
> that the "second" horse runs far better? don't
> tell me, that the punters could see this out of
> one race, they both ran...
>
> i think as usual i won't get an answer here.
> business as usual, but for me these are things,
> that makes me sick in racing. and i am not
> speaking out of my pocket because i saw the
> betting and took - just to be involved in the
> dirty game, the "second" horse.
>
> but maybe there is ssomething i did not see
> correkt. then tell me.


saldiani actually the better horse was the one with a "second" jock - ran better times in better company.

yes, maybe.anyway, with clear transparency like m.bass or sham or howell are practising, this would not happen. or not in this suspicious way.


gregbucks Wrote:

---

> Not often is get 2 year old races right but 2nd
> Marshall runners formline far stronger imo

the track looks in top nick better than soft....but those who tried to come to the standside got their ass-kicked badly

saldiani Wrote:

---

> i do not want to sound like a typical
> conspiracy-theory-man, but how could this be, that
> on the marshall-horse with the better jock on, is
> offered a lot of money by a layer on betfair
> meanwhile very little on the marshall horsewith
> the "second" jock. and then very clearly comesout
> that the "second" horse runs far better? don't
> tell me, that the punters could see this out of
> one race, they both ran...
>
> i think as usual i won't get an answer here.
> business as usual, but for me these are things,
> that makes me sick in racing. and i am not
> speaking out of my pocket because i saw the
> betting and took - just to be involved in the
> dirty game, the "second" horse.
>
> but maybe there is ssomething i did not see
> correkt. then tell me.


imo the Lanner Falcon formline is inferior to Moulin Royales.

@Dashing.... if undecided revert to the GOLDEN RULE.... Never change your bets (

yes, but this was only the second start, so a trainer should know, what people are thinking if mj sits on the one horse. that this is the improving horse. look at the tote, all these guys put a lot of money, were believing the choice of trainer (or owner?). difficult question, i know, anyway i have a very bad feeling, if so clearly is offered a lot of place lay-money on the mj-horse. who was so sure about, that this horse is NOT improving? how can u be sure, that the trainer was not paying attention about which jockey on which horse? would u offer 1000 euro on place ona horse, where the normal punter believes, this is the improving one?


keniza999 Wrote:

---

> saldiani Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > i do not want to sound like a typical
> > conspiracy-theory-man, but how could this be,
> that
> > on the marshall-horse with the better jock on,
> is
> > offered a lot of money by a layer on betfair
> > meanwhile very little on the marshall horsewith
> > the "second" jock. and then very clearly
> comesout
> > that the "second" horse runs far better? don't
> > tell me, that the punters could see this out of
> > one race, they both ran...
> >
> > i think as usual i won't get an answer here.
> > business as usual, but for me these are things,
> > that makes me sick in racing. and i am not
> > speaking out of my pocket because i saw the
> > betting and took - just to be involved in the
> > dirty game, the "second" horse.
> >
> > but maybe there is ssomething i did not see
> > correkt. then tell me.
>
>
> saldiani actually the better horse was the one
> with a "second" jock - ran better times in better
> company.

The Madji Wrote:

---

> @Dashing.... if undecided revert to the GOLDEN
> RULE.... Never change your bets (

still undecided so not gna change it hope all goes well.....sticking to the rule:)

Race 2: Bold Var x Rio Branco x Simonsberg x Hermanus

QT box 2,3,12,13 R24

gregbucks Wrote:

---

> Race 2: Bold Var x Rio Branco x Simonsberg x
> Hermanus


Well done.