Kenilworth 4/12/2013

INTERNET JET ( Early birthday present for Stallone )

Anyone tell me if the official going is yielding?

Englander Wrote:

---

> Anyone tell me if the official going is yielding?


From what I have seen, Good to Soft.

Thanks Shrek,

farking ridiculous I have to say, why water the blardy thing to make it good to soft, what's wrong with good? Maybe someone gave the "groundsman" a very nice tip at the last meeting

Englander Wrote:

---

> R4 Acrostar
> R5 Tiger Tiger e/w
> R6 If its running on the soft side, Danzey Green.
> If good, Wise Choice e/w

And now I am proper p1ssed off :X Assumed it would be good going, why wouldn't I?? so included Wise Choice in all my accumulators, including a double with Tiger Tiger at 8s and 16s. Sorry for harping, I am sure it doesn't bother anyone else but I think this is farcical. Going should have been left as good rather than over-watering and information regarding the going has been shocking. Farking t0ssers the lot of them

Eng the 16th at Ken they said 100mm fell over night. Their rain-guage only holds 100mm !!?? The going for that Sat was reported as slightly soft. WTF ?? You tell me they have clue ? Absolute joke ! CPT racing at its best !

Englander Wrote:

---

> Englander Wrote:
>

---

>

---

>
> > R4 Acrostar
> > R5 Tiger Tiger e/w
> > R6 If its running on the soft side, Danzey
> Green.
> > If good, Wise Choice e/w
>
> And now I am proper p1ssed off :X Assumed it would
> be good going, why wouldn't I?? so included Wise
> Choice in all my accumulators, including a double
> with Tiger Tiger at 8s and 16s. Sorry for harping,
> I am sure it doesn't bother anyone else but I
> think this is farcical. Going should have been
> left as good rather than over-watering and
> information regarding the going has been shocking.
> Farking t0ssers the lot of them

don't think it mattered to result
you must have backed them ew singles engles,you know what will happen if you cop ew doubles with a 16/1 poke
that returned 7s...closure,they don't like it up em.

davetheflower Wrote:

---

> Englander Wrote:

> don't think it mattered to result
> you must have backed them ew singles engles,you
> know what will happen if you cop ew doubles with a
> 16/1 poke
> that returned 7s...closure,they don't like it up
> em.

I'm not sure DG likes good going Dave, form on "wet" looks much better to me, hence why I made the differential. On softish going DG looked a decent bet. I did 16s before the market move Dave, nothing I can do about late movement. Didn't do TT e/w single (small win only), did WC small e/w. Part of the point Dave is I would have been all over DG had I believed the ground would be softish, I wasn't because I assumed it would be good. I would probably also have had the double TT and DG. Shouldn't really be having the discussion though is the main point, why was the track watered so heavily? and the giving out of official info regarding the going is a disgrace. Anyway I look at it, its sh1te. And I can't get 500/1 on United to win 5-0 tonight lol

Late arrival here today. Why can't Maties Wildekat win this? Looks like she can run a little. 1000 again.

Maybe becoz V Niekerk ride the stable mate no seems to give her a chance?

Englander Wrote:

---

> Englander Wrote:
>

---

>

---

>
> > R4 Acrostar
> > R5 Tiger Tiger e/w
> > R6 If its running on the soft side, Danzey
> Green.
> > If good, Wise Choice e/w
>
> And now I am proper p1ssed off :X Assumed it would
> be good going, why wouldn't I?? so included Wise
> Choice in all my accumulators, including a double
> with Tiger Tiger at 8s and 16s. Sorry for harping,
> I am sure it doesn't bother anyone else but I
> think this is farcical. Going should have been
> left as good rather than over-watering and
> information regarding the going has been shocking.
> Farking t0ssers the lot of them

And here I was under the impression that only natural weather conditions influenced the going.

This ain't farcical, this borders on intent.


I have a garden. And I try to ensure that every piatch of my garden is in the same condition as I would like to have it.

No weeds, no rocks or stones, or holes or soft gorund or possibility of stepping on a patch that would yield.

Would anyone have their kids runs around in unsafe conditions.

If the track managers are so good at their jobs, why do we end up with the going either good on the inside, or going good on the outside, or in the middle.

Is it not the track managers job to ensure that the going is good and even across the track irrespective of the draw.

Is it possible that track conditions get prepared after draws are made?

Somebody employs these track managers, so it would be foolish to think that, that employee is allowed to do his job freely.


Reminds me of levelling the playing fields, aka handicapping.

Would be good for transparency for the track manager to air his views on the whether inside , middle , or outside is better.

Howard Wrote:

---

> Make Aksaray my BB for the day.


Thanks Howard......

(tu)Sure