24 June 2014 Kenilworth
- Englander
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11538
- Thanks: 829
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
Englander Wrote:
> That finishing line camera angle really is beyond
> a joke, not a single person thought that was a
> dead-heat and yet... :X (td) :X
And Bob's comment (though ludicrous (
) ) sums the whole thing up... of all the finishing line camera angles in all the world Kenilworth's must be the biggest farking joke of the lot (not that I watch racing anywhere else of course but when I want to rant, no prisoners!
)
> That finishing line camera angle really is beyond
> a joke, not a single person thought that was a
> dead-heat and yet... :X (td) :X
And Bob's comment (though ludicrous (


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Englander
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11538
- Thanks: 829
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
Rob, sorry, excuse my ignorance, what's a review? Surely the judge's call is final or can someone say he needs an eye test and change the result?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dean321
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4502
- Thanks: 479
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
I rather take my half than nil.. I thought the 1 lost.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- lead eyes
-
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 226
- Thanks: 1
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
TNaiker , I had my eyes tested last week - Dr. said I have 20/20 vision. I think the judges need their eyes retested. Red Peril clearly WON.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
But the position of the line/a doesn't explain getting it wrong,as a judge,first time around???
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Englander
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11538
- Thanks: 829
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
CnC... I haven't stood there and I am not interested in that to be honest bud (though thanks for the "observation
), I want to know why every person on the planet can see one thing and the result gets called something different time and time again. I am tired of thinking I have won at that blardy track only to find that not to be the case. And honestly, it seems to go against me 9/10 times and usually favours a much shorter priced horse. Does nothing to improve trust in CT racing, much the opposite (td) Serves me right for betting on bumper cars with their engines removed for the first 80% of the ride! (
)
<



Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82713
- Thanks: 6507
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
Engels what part of my comment do you find Ludicrous?
calling the wrong result is a fucking disgrace
calling the wrong result is a fucking disgrace
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
Englander,that is how they reported the change of the originally posted result ..."after review"........... I have assumed that to mean a literal translation of "another look"........by whom I do not know !!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Englander
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11538
- Thanks: 829
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
Thanks Rob (tu) just sounds very wrong to me
Bob... "ludicrous" lol imo referred to the fact you thought the 1 had held on (tu)
Bob... "ludicrous" lol imo referred to the fact you thought the 1 had held on (tu)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Englander
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11538
- Thanks: 829
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
Surely that was close enough for the Kenilworth "mafia" to get involved again and make it a dead head between Mat in Red and Golden Dane? 
Thumbs up to the commentator though, I wouldn't call anything now until after the third review of the result has been announced and sufficient time has passed to "prepare" the photo
(
)

Thumbs up to the commentator though, I wouldn't call anything now until after the third review of the result has been announced and sufficient time has passed to "prepare" the photo


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82713
- Thanks: 6507
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
Englander Wrote:
> Thanks Rob (tu) just sounds very wrong to me
>
> Bob... "ludicrous" lol imo referred to the fact
> you thought the 1 had held on (tu)
cool Engels
ps your probably watching the same feed as me and the racing international guy( might be cyril )was very sceptical about calling the result,he even said that the result is to close to be official
Then Next thing Vicky is interviewing the connections
> Thanks Rob (tu) just sounds very wrong to me
>
> Bob... "ludicrous" lol imo referred to the fact
> you thought the 1 had held on (tu)
cool Engels
ps your probably watching the same feed as me and the racing international guy( might be cyril )was very sceptical about calling the result,he even said that the result is to close to be official
Then Next thing Vicky is interviewing the connections
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: 24 June 2014 Kenilworth
11 years 2 months ago
hibernia Wrote:
> Englander Wrote:
>
>
> > Thanks Rob (tu) just sounds very wrong to me
> >
> > Bob... "ludicrous" lol imo referred to the fact
> > you thought the 1 had held on (tu)
>
>
> cool Engels
>
> ps your probably watching the same feed as me and
> the racing international guy( might be cyril )was
> very sceptical about calling the result,he even
> said that the result is to close to be official
>
> Then Next thing Vicky is interviewing the
> connections
With respect Hibs , the UK commentators and presenters don't commit unless there is 2 lgths to spare.
> Englander Wrote:
>
>
> > Thanks Rob (tu) just sounds very wrong to me
> >
> > Bob... "ludicrous" lol imo referred to the fact
> > you thought the 1 had held on (tu)
>
>
> cool Engels
>
> ps your probably watching the same feed as me and
> the racing international guy( might be cyril )was
> very sceptical about calling the result,he even
> said that the result is to close to be official
>
> Then Next thing Vicky is interviewing the
> connections
With respect Hibs , the UK commentators and presenters don't commit unless there is 2 lgths to spare.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.106 seconds