Greyville Wednesday

My plays for today
R4#1 Hands of stone.
R7#2 Le Forti
R9 Nitro Nori and Poivre to be in the quartet at least.

Pa 2/1/7,9/2,5/2/1,4,10/2,9,11

Play well.

colors wrote: why does Winning Form not differentiate poly from turf at Greyville ?
They do so for Fairview

Hi Team

They are differentiated in the Winning Form:
Code D = Greyville Turf
Code G = Greyville Polytrack

Tanaburs and Fremont street could be better than the odds auggests

Dev wrote:

colors wrote: why does Winning Form not differentiate poly from turf at Greyville ?
They do so for Fairview

Hi Team

They are differentiated in the Winning Form:
Code D = Greyville Turf
Code G = Greyville Polytrack

lol Colors and Agra, I concur with Dev (would have been a shock if he was wrong! lol) and in fact I believe the problem is with Fairview...

Sorry to the multitude of posters on this thread, kind of invading your space here but,

Dev, for the Poly at Fairview the letters are different as you state but the course form records includes the horse's turf form, obviously the same for c and d. The graphs for the % wins and places by stall gate also include the turf form. Can't these be rectified, seems very basic and I am sure someone must have spotted it by now?

And while I am it, is it still impossible for WF to differentiate between the Vaal inside and outside courses and show the records for these courses separately, as well as the % graphs? Again, seems basic.

Is it possible the graphs can be done with the number of runners applied to create a true picture... I don't think any account is taken of this so if you have twice as many runners in half of the races it naturally paints a more negative picture for the higher draw numbers.

And... to repeat a personal plea!! lol... can't they go back to the way they did average times before, the changes that have been implemented to those timings over the last couple of years have rendered a very useful tool almost entirely worthless now. For me anyway. They are usually as inconsistent as the actual times now!

And yes I have raised 90% of these points with the team directly previously and no, I don't want to do so again. Nothing personal, seem nice guys, but bashing my head against what often seems a brick wall (no disrespect) is not my favoured past-time

All that said, the showing of incorrect data etc has seemed much better over recent months.

Grrrrrr at the jock on Marhoob. Next time out will will win. .. just hope not the same jock.

Le Chat D'amour. Shea up again, gets blinkers, steps in distance, first time on poly, 20/1. put the lights the lights out.....

Hi Englander

I will PM you so we can discuss this off the thread, as most people are following this for today's racing.

Dean321 wrote: Grrrrrr at the jock on Marhoob. Next time out will will win. .. just hope not the same jock.

methinks it needs further, was drawn badly....

lol England...

4 places SE AGABOR

keniza999 wrote:

Dean321 wrote: Grrrrrr at the jock on Marhoob. Next time out will will win. .. just hope not the same jock.

methinks it needs further, was drawn badly....

noticed the draw thought it was still full of running and should have run down the winner. Anyway we win some and lose others.

would have liked to have seen the fractions for that 4th race as I agree muzi I think got it wrong while Cormack read the script...

Mxothwa and mguldwa
Next one