Kenilworth 24/12/14

Bookmakers cover themselves with an "obvious mistake" clause.
I can understand this, however I think it may be open to manipulation as the definition of obvious mistake is totally theirs.
50-1 however is an obvious mistake and your bet will be cancelled or changed to 16-10 odds ( possibly even after the event)

Interestingly enough though, I cant find the rule on the sportingbet website. Most bookmakers have it fairly easy to find.

Yesterday they(sportingbet) still had 7/1 on Seven Stars. Was 33/10 elsewhere. Managed to get 11/2 though on Bet365, but wasn't void after the track switch unlike the local bookies who abandoned.

Goodness gracious.

Race 3- I fancy Beaufort Sea. Good each way bet step up in distance will definitely suit as it is a fortwood breed. The last two runs looked promising. Otherwise I really like Peace Pact today. Good draw. Grant knows the horse and a good run behind Zambezi river in that feature race. The run prior was also well in a higher mr race.

Whiteline Fever wrote: Yesterday they(sportingbet) still had 7/1 on Seven Stars. Was 33/10 elsewhere. Managed to get 11/2 though on Bet365, but wasn't void after the track switch unlike the local bookies who abandoned.

All in the mind was 8/1 easy in the UK when it was 7/2 in SAF

One of the reasons I had my accounts closed by most bookmakers is because they are lazy and don't update prices regulary, they just Barr you for being a wide boy

I went onto the Betting world site at 09.00am this morning and in Race 4 it showed that that the three Snaith runners were scratched no,s1,6,7 now I see that there are prices next to them. Can anybody help please to whether they are scratched or not.

Bipot: 7/2/9/9/6/6
PA: 2,3/2,9/3,9/1,6/2,6,7/1,5/1,15

tottenham wrote: I went onto the Betting world site at 09.00am this morning and in Race 4 it showed that that the three Snaith runners were scratched no,s1,6,7 now I see that there are prices next to them. Can anybody help please to whether they are scratched or not.

they maybe got mixed up that under scratchings on gallop in small writing it says none then the next thing there are 3 jockey changes on the above horses

cratchings
None
Jockey Changes
Race No. Horse No. Horse Name Comment Time Date Adv. Advised Captured
4 1 Bobby James B Fayd'Herbe 16:24 20141218 Justin Snaith Trainer
4 6 Lotus Lily Lake R Fourie 08:04 20141224 Justin Snaith Barnesg
4 7 Tour de Var C Orffer 08:18 20141224 J Snaith Sarishar

Would rather back Sister Act for a place race 1 than fat ass

Race 1 - except for Fat Bottom Girl, raced runners look fairly ordinary. The unraced wouldn't have to be too good to feature.

Race 2 - Black Belvedere's last 2 runs this distance pretty good

Race 3 - looks between 2 and 4

Race 4 - Silver Salver seems to have had problems but won in good time this c & d

Race 5 - Vogue Idea ran well this c & d last time after a break when drawn deepest

Bob Brogan wrote: Would rather back Sister Act for a place race 1 than fat ass

oops

HA HA massive win pools about £14k, they should go check the betfair win pools