"Reversi PA" Tourney Kenilworth

Titch wrote:

Shadley wrote: What is the rule on scratchings?

goes onto the fav so you should be safe Shadley LOL

Titch wrote:

Deeno wrote: Here is the winning one.

Leg 1. 3x4x5
Leg 2. 2** x5x6
Leg 3. 2** x8x3
Leg 4. 5x8x1
Leg 5. 1x3x7
Leg 6. 4x9x1
Leg 7. 5x6x1

In my personal PA , I will be going shorter in leg 2,3 and 7

Deeno the object is to MISS in all 7 legs...you may want to amend your selections.....but then again maybe not

what was going through your mind when you saw the others PA :lol: :lol: :lol:

Dellboy wrote:

Titch wrote:

Deeno wrote: Here is the winning one.

Leg 1. 3x4x5
Leg 2. 2** x5x6
Leg 3. 2** x8x3
Leg 4. 5x8x1
Leg 5. 1x3x7
Leg 6. 4x9x1
Leg 7. 5x6x1

In my personal PA , I will be going shorter in leg 2,3 and 7

Deeno the object is to MISS in all 7 legs...you may want to amend your selections.....but then again maybe not

what was going through your mind when you saw the others PA :lol: :lol: :lol:

I just whizzed through the topics without paying much attention.

I generally do not take bets to lose on purpose buddy

3rd Leg result 8x10x3x2
Survivors
Chris van Buuren (4th Leg 2,4,6)
BigH (4th Leg 6,10,11)
Frodo (4th Leg 4,10,11)
Durbs (4th Leg 2,6,11)
cycad (4thLeg 2x4x11)

Deeno wrote:

Dellboy wrote:

Titch wrote:

Deeno wrote: Here is the winning one.

Leg 1. 3x4x5
Leg 2. 2** x5x6
Leg 3. 2** x8x3
Leg 4. 5x8x1
Leg 5. 1x3x7
Leg 6. 4x9x1
Leg 7. 5x6x1

In my personal PA , I will be going shorter in leg 2,3 and 7

Deeno the object is to MISS in all 7 legs...you may want to amend your selections.....but then again maybe not

what was going through your mind when you saw the others PA :lol: :lol: :lol:

I just whizzed through the topics without paying much attention.

I generally do not take bets to lose on purpose buddy

O i get that i was on the wave length.... that maby you did look at the others and say gee look at these :silly: tips

So 6,10 and 11 have been scratched - meaning that if the tote fav places, we are all dead ? :ohmy:

Being a 'losing' competition, should the scratchings not go onto the least favoured runner (the one paying the biggest did on the tote at the jump) ?

Frodo wrote: So 6,10 and 11 have been scratched - meaning that if the tote fav places, we are all dead ? :ohmy:

Being a 'losing' competition, should the scratchings not go onto the least favoured runner (the one paying the biggest did on the tote at the jump) ?

makes sense :pinch:

3rd Leg result 7x5x3x8
All 5 survivors knocked out by default so we will call this leg Nul and Void

Survivors
Chris van Buuren (5th Leg 5,8,9)
BigH (5th Leg 2,8,9)
Frodo (5th Leg 2,8,9)
Durbs (5th Leg 5,6,9)
cycad (5th Leg 5,6,8 )

5th Race result 5x4x8x6
Mango Moon eliminates all survivors...
will put another tourney together again shortly...

Titch wrote: 5th Race result 5x4x8x6
Mango Moon eliminates all survivors...
will put another tourney together again shortly...

Thanks was a good laugh

Thanks Titch.

As we saw today, hard to pick 3 horses in every race - and also the debacle with the starting stalls did not make things any easier with quite a few longshots being scratched.

Suggestions for the next one:

1. Let scratchings be represented by the biggest tote outsider in the race, rather than the tote favorite

2. Limit the number of selections to 2 runners per race OR if there are no outright winners, have a 'countback' - so that the winner is determined by having the least number of his/her selections finish in the 1st 3