Vaal Thursday

Tappa wrote:

fafi wrote:

rob faux wrote:

Tappa wrote: I'm no expert when it comes to horseracing, but i don't know how a "top tipster" can make a 5to10 horse running in a workriders race his best bet!

Easy ........it had easily the best form and the rider/stable strike rate was easily the best of those with form..............good bets are about relativity and it qualified .....it got beat ....shit happens!
(I don't know which "Top Tipster" you referring to .........but the one that posts here has my respect as he clearly understands form and value IMO!)

(Its difference in opinion that keeps racing interesting ..............Lyles P6 banker is my lay of the day .......we cant both be right!! )

i agree with Tappa because no matter how you look at it a 5/10 win bet has no value and then its the matter of a groom rider

i mean it did not form part of the exotics and ffs how much would you have to stake if a grand means so little
i think he climbed on the wagon being the shortest priced horse of the day

The "bust the tote" on Bettingword

fafi wrote: how can you make a 5/10 shot a best bet on beaten form,in a weak maiden and then theres the issue of gelding and if you did a proper form study taking a place on the winner was far less riskier and better odds to booth.Sometimes i think you just smoke with no fire

rob faux wrote:

fafi wrote: how can you make a 5/10 shot a best bet on beaten form,in a weak maiden and then theres the issue of gelding and if you did a proper form study taking a place on the winner was far less riskier and better odds to booth.Sometimes i think you just smoke with no fire

You showing your true "Colours" again!

Craig Pienaar wrote:

rob faux wrote:

fafi wrote: how can you make a 5/10 shot a best bet on beaten form,in a weak maiden and then theres the issue of gelding and if you did a proper form study taking a place on the winner was far less riskier and better odds to booth.Sometimes i think you just smoke with no fire

You showing your true "Colours" again!

:lol: :lol: what a clown

fafi wrote: its amazing ! we were discussing the merits of making the horse a best bet and then you became personal with the wavelength comment and im showing my colours

chicken n chips wrote:

fafi wrote: its amazing ! we were discussing the merits of making the horse a best bet and then you became personal with the wavelength comment and im showing my colours

fafi you must remember on this forum that if you dont think the same as others and toe the line then you are an outsider. Ask me i dont even get genuine questions answered by the people who run the forum. Ignore them and post what you want so long as its not personal or threatening.

rob faux wrote:

Tappa wrote:

fafi wrote:

rob faux wrote:

Tappa wrote: I'm no expert when it comes to horseracing, but i don't know how a "top tipster" can make a 5to10 horse running in a workriders race his best bet!

Easy ........it had easily the best form and the rider/stable strike rate was easily the best of those with form..............good bets are about relativity and it qualified .....it got beat ....shit happens!
(I don't know which "Top Tipster" you referring to .........but the one that posts here has my respect as he clearly understands form and value IMO!)

(Its difference in opinion that keeps racing interesting ..............Lyles P6 banker is my lay of the day .......we cant both be right!! )

i agree with Tappa because no matter how you look at it a 5/10 win bet has no value and then its the matter of a groom rider

i mean it did not form part of the exotics and ffs how much would you have to stake if a grand means so little
i think he climbed on the wagon being the shortest priced horse of the day

The "bust the tote" on Bettingword

Thanks ............at least I'm on Darryl Maree's wavelength and not Fafi's .....that's a relief!

ElvisisKing wrote: I think van Zyl stable to Open & Close the meeting..... 5 / 1 double.

In fact they only have 4 runners on the day........ include them ALL in yankees.