why was london guest not disqualified 3rd race july day

how can you take out 3 horses chances and still keep 1st place..surely there must be a rule in place for what looked to me like reckless riding on lerenas behalf and place the horse last..please i know that the answer will come back that the 2nd horse couldnt have beaten the winner so please answer my question on reckless riding and impeding 3 horses..maybe karel can post the stipes report for us as i am sure brandon got a holiday for his efforts

The Stipendiary Stewards Reported (ER) : LONDON GUEST (* B Lerena) : The winner. Selected for the taking of specimens for analysis. Trainer A Rivalland advised (TK).
As a result of the Starter’s Report concerning TAMARINO BAY (J Samuel), the Board, acting in terms of Rule 61.5.10.2 declared TAMARINO BAY to be have been withdrawn as a result of the Handler failing to release TAMARINO BAY when the start was effected.
At approximately the 50 metre mark LONDON GUEST (*B Lerena) shifted outwards away from the whip carrying AUTUMN FROST (K Shea) outwards on to MAGICAL BALLAD (C Orffer) who in turn made contact with SKY BLASTER (J Lloyd) resulting in these three horses becoming cramped for galloping room for a number of strides. A race review was called by a Stipendiary Steward regarding this incident and after reviewing the patrol videos from the various angles were of the opinion that although the interference was significant, that but for the interference none of the effected horses would have beaten the winner and in view of this decided to take no further action and allowed the Judge’s result to stand.
Apprentice B Lerena was suspended for a period of ten days for a contravention of Rule 62.2.7 in that as the rider of LONDON GUEST he failed to ensure that he did not cause interference to the horses AUTUMN FROST (K Shea), MAGICAL BALLAD (C Orffer) and SKY BLASTER (J Lloyd) in the latter stages (suspension dates to be advised).
At approximately the 200 metre mark Jockey K Shea the rider of AUTUMN FROST accidentally dropped his off side rein

Interesting viewpoint (none of the affected horses would have beaten the winner); apparently the trainers/jockeys agreed, because they did not object themselves?

well pirates i watched in awe and wondered why no hooter - very poor showing as i think the bumping affected the minor positions - very confused by the result -

Pirates - I take it you backed Equal Image ?

no i didnt back equal image,in fact on july day i play the transvaal meeting.

Was just wondering why you never brought his interference into the conversation

i backed nothing either just lost as to why no objection lodged in the intrest of racing

i didnt see the head on of equal images race so cant comment but would like to know if a horse can be disqualified for causing as much interference as london guest did.

Bold Ellinore was scratched if I remember correctly.

Sorry Cats , I was under the impression it was scratched.

Eish Cats I think it was scratched mate. I remember wanting to back it but saw it as scratched. We are talking about July Day aren't we ?