Kenilworth Vs Turffontein ???

  • Marsellus Wallace
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3350
  • Thanks: 140

Re: Re: Kenilworth Vs Turffontein ???

14 years 6 months ago
#110436
Kenilworth is two seconds slower than Gauteng on average; an animal doing a 1000m in 56 seconds in gp will take approximately 58 seconds to achieve the same in the mother city..i agree that the wind and probably softer conditions are the cause...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

betfred
  • Andrewest
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: Kenilworth Vs Turffontein ???

14 years 6 months ago
#110441
Kenilworth = Sea level and Turffontein = High altitude

don't athletes run faster at a high altitude where the air is thinner.

is that not why the top DBN (58 sec) and CPT (58 seconds) sprinters do well at Turffontein?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • antsinner
  • Topic Author
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: Kenilworth Vs Turffontein ???

14 years 6 months ago
#110599
i did not factor the altitude into my thoughts . I wonder how great an impact it has ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.101 seconds