what price ian jayes winnig interview is not shown in replay package?

he tore into the authorities so how we betting it isnt shown in the replays tonight?X(

no one capture it and i will put it on the site...?

Thats absurd,i believe whats done with the authorities behind closed doors should not effect the trainer come owners interview.

Jayes complaint was based on the low MR of a horse that had been rated much higher but he kept running the horse uncompetitively at that level,surely aware that the rating will reduce.....and if it hadn't the indicators are the horse would never have earned another cent.
I know there is a lot wrong with racing but I battle to find merit in his complaint in this instance.
Perhaps I missed his point!

:S................watched replays nothing shown and in this case probably missed nothing?

I did not see the original interview (or the replays) - but if it were indeed cut from the reply package, it is another indication that anything 'positive' in terms of the RA, P, TT, NHA, etc will be shown repeatedly, but anything perceived to be negative (whether everyone agrees witht the 'facts' mentioned is immaterial imo) is swept under carpet and treated with the attitude of 'maybe if we just ignore it, it will go away'

I did not see any interviews on the replays, are u saying they cut them all due to one comment.
If I did have a winner and was on the TV would be furious if it was removed.

Typical. It's good, though, that not everyone has been driven to becoming an ass-kisser.

this is part of an article on SP regarding Jayes.....

In stark contrast, the less glamorous side of racing also reared its head at the Vaal today when outspoken trainer Ian Jayes stepped in front of the cameras after his barefoot mare Be Speedy got up late under the young star JP Van Der Merwe to win the MR 64 Handicap over 1400m. Tellytrack interviewer Dave Mollett deserves credit for handling the exchanges with aplomb and allowing the trainer to speak his mind and not resorting to cutting things short with a ‘Big Brother scissors’, as we have witnessed in the past. Unfortunately the Jayes post-race interview was not included in the evening’s replays of the Vaal meeting. We don’t necessarily agree with unwarranted criticism in the public domain. But was it really unwarranted? Was it malicious? And the subsequent censorship? We can’t really support that approach either.

We label Mr Jayes as ‘outspoken’ purely on the basis that he is a man who is not scared to open his mouth and voice his opinion on issues that are frustrating him and his colleagues. What is more puzzling is , why are the other trainers, some of whom apparently share Jayes’ aggravation, so quiet and seemingly frightened to speak up? Or does it just not make good business sense or common courtesy to castigate the authorities ?

Be Speedy won a very nice race but came in here under a merit rating of 54 and also as a reserve runner. For the second time in as many weeks, Jayes voiced his disapproval of the handicapper’s low rating of this type of moderate filly. He said he knew many trainers with similar horses in their yards and that owners were being denied an opportunity to run their horses and earn their way, as they were consistently eliminated. He also asked why the other bottom weight reserve runner was set a weight as high as 54,5kg?

Jayes didn’t mince his words at all. He asked when the powers would ‘wake up’ to the needs of owners and trainers. He took a swipe at Phumelela, the National Horseracing Authority and even asked what the Racing Association were doing to act in the interests of owners. He said they were all clueless. The handicapping, the programming – even the track management that saw them halve the size of the Vaal track. “ Must we shoot the horses rather?”, he asked in obvious anger.

Whether one agrees or disagrees with the views of this experienced trainer, the question begs as to why capable accomplished professionals feel inclined to resort to verbal attacks on public television? Does it not say something about the simmering frustration on the ground at our industry leaders and their lack of communication and PR? This is a public horseracing website. We don’t take sides. Those bodies are welcome to address Mr Jayes’ concerns. Let’s wait and see what happens.

its an absolute disgrace that tellymuck can not show his interview ...it reminds me of the apartheid days when the nats ruled the press and tv ..he is entitled to his opinion and was in no way was malicious towards any single person...is free speech not allowed anymore in this country?it really shows how pathetic and insecure the leaders of this industry are..

There is no doubt that eliminating that part of the interview is tantamount to censorship and merely confirms the lack of competence of the operators.
They should have let the listeners be the the judge of the merits.
I,for one,was not so sure I agreed but that does no mean his opinions should be stifled!

And yl complain about ANC and FIFA