Sporting Post says merger disallowed
- Jack Dash
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Sporting Post says merger disallowed
13 years 2 months ago
Sporting Post says merger disallowed
www.sportingpost.co.za/2012/03/20/frontp...horseracing-mergers/
www.sportingpost.co.za/2012/03/20/frontp...horseracing-mergers/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82472
- Thanks: 6449
Re: Competition Commission prohibits horseracing mergers
13 years 2 months ago
20 March 2012
Commission prohibits horseracing mergers
The Competition Commission (“the Commission”) has prohibited a set of proposed transactions in the horseracing industry involving Kenilworth Racing (Pty) Ltd (“Kenilworth”). The first transaction involves the acquisition by Kenilworth over the Western Cape business of Gold Circle (Pty) Ltd (“Gold Circle WC”). The second transaction is the take-over of Kenilworth by the Thoroughbred Horseracing Trust. As part of the transactions, Phumelela will manage Kenilworth/Gold Circle WC through a management agreement between Phumelela and Kenilworth, effectively giving Phumelela control of Gold Circle WC. These transactions are interdependent as they cannot be carried out individually.
Phumelela and Gold Circle WC administer the sport of horseracing, tote betting, and televise horseracing events. Kenilworth is a company created for purposes of this transaction.
Phumelela and Gold Circle are the only two racing operators in the country who exclusively hold totalisator licences (a licence which allows for certain betting and gambling activities in each province of South Africa). Gold Circle holds the licence in the Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal and Phumelela the remaining provinces. Post-merger Phumelela will operate in 8 of the 9 provinces while Gold Circle remains in KwaZulu-Natal only. This effectively substantially increases Phumelela’s share of the market for the administration of horseracing and the associated betting activities in South Africa. In addition a set of arrangement and agreements between Phumelela and Gold Circle diminish competition between the two groups.
The Commission found that the proposed transactions will significantly lessen competition in the horseracing administration, horseracing television rights as well as the betting markets as this will allow Phumelela to further entrench its already strong position such that it can exert market power in these markets. Given the high barriers to entry, the high market shares and low countervailing power in this market the mergers are likely to create a market structure that will entrench these to the exclusion of other firms, particularly small and emerging horseracing entities.
The merging parties advanced failing firm and efficiency arguments, which could not outweigh the likely lessening of competition as a result of the proposed transactions. It was also submitted that the merger will save jobs in the operations of Gold Circle WC as the firm was likely to fail. The Commission found that Gold Circle WC is not likely to fail and there are also other potential buyers.
The Commission has also approved a separate and unrelated merger transaction in the horseracing industry involving the acquisition of the Clairwood racecourse in KwaZulu-Natal by Global Pact 225 (Pty) Ltd, a property developer. As a result of this merger, the Clairwood racecourse will be re-developed into an industrial and commercial park linked to the Durban harbour expansion.
ENDS
For more information:
Molebogeng Taunyane, External Communication Coordinator
Commission prohibits horseracing mergers
The Competition Commission (“the Commission”) has prohibited a set of proposed transactions in the horseracing industry involving Kenilworth Racing (Pty) Ltd (“Kenilworth”). The first transaction involves the acquisition by Kenilworth over the Western Cape business of Gold Circle (Pty) Ltd (“Gold Circle WC”). The second transaction is the take-over of Kenilworth by the Thoroughbred Horseracing Trust. As part of the transactions, Phumelela will manage Kenilworth/Gold Circle WC through a management agreement between Phumelela and Kenilworth, effectively giving Phumelela control of Gold Circle WC. These transactions are interdependent as they cannot be carried out individually.
Phumelela and Gold Circle WC administer the sport of horseracing, tote betting, and televise horseracing events. Kenilworth is a company created for purposes of this transaction.
Phumelela and Gold Circle are the only two racing operators in the country who exclusively hold totalisator licences (a licence which allows for certain betting and gambling activities in each province of South Africa). Gold Circle holds the licence in the Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal and Phumelela the remaining provinces. Post-merger Phumelela will operate in 8 of the 9 provinces while Gold Circle remains in KwaZulu-Natal only. This effectively substantially increases Phumelela’s share of the market for the administration of horseracing and the associated betting activities in South Africa. In addition a set of arrangement and agreements between Phumelela and Gold Circle diminish competition between the two groups.
The Commission found that the proposed transactions will significantly lessen competition in the horseracing administration, horseracing television rights as well as the betting markets as this will allow Phumelela to further entrench its already strong position such that it can exert market power in these markets. Given the high barriers to entry, the high market shares and low countervailing power in this market the mergers are likely to create a market structure that will entrench these to the exclusion of other firms, particularly small and emerging horseracing entities.
The merging parties advanced failing firm and efficiency arguments, which could not outweigh the likely lessening of competition as a result of the proposed transactions. It was also submitted that the merger will save jobs in the operations of Gold Circle WC as the firm was likely to fail. The Commission found that Gold Circle WC is not likely to fail and there are also other potential buyers.
The Commission has also approved a separate and unrelated merger transaction in the horseracing industry involving the acquisition of the Clairwood racecourse in KwaZulu-Natal by Global Pact 225 (Pty) Ltd, a property developer. As a result of this merger, the Clairwood racecourse will be re-developed into an industrial and commercial park linked to the Durban harbour expansion.
ENDS
For more information:
Molebogeng Taunyane, External Communication Coordinator
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82472
- Thanks: 6449
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
13 years 2 months ago
oops Jack had just posted the Media release
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Craig Eudey
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4561
- Thanks: 559
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
13 years 2 months ago
I am sure they will appeal.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82472
- Thanks: 6449
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
13 years 2 months ago
Was there not other interested parties at one point? sure this will open a door for them...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82472
- Thanks: 6449
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
13 years 2 months ago
Craig Eudey Wrote:
> I am sure they will appeal.
Been told they have made their best arguements already
> I am sure they will appeal.
Been told they have made their best arguements already
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Craig Eudey
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4561
- Thanks: 559
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
13 years 2 months ago
I heard a few days ago that the appeal board is a bit more on the ball.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Flash Harry
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
13 years 2 months ago
on the ball or on the take?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsellus Wallace
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3350
- Thanks: 140
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- umlilo
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
13 years 2 months ago
The only benefit that the merger would have was for the benefit of the shareholders (operators) who can take their dividends.... and run!
Aspects of the General Reporting Index are now being seen in a more investigative light as accountability remains non-existent and the exit has always been...generating income for Government. The casinos and Lotto generate much more.
The next one to follow; the COE from the DTI.
Then, the Sports Portfolio on the PMG.
Bumpy days ahead!!!!
Unfortunately, the cards are already on the table for all to see!
Aspects of the General Reporting Index are now being seen in a more investigative light as accountability remains non-existent and the exit has always been...generating income for Government. The casinos and Lotto generate much more.
The next one to follow; the COE from the DTI.
Then, the Sports Portfolio on the PMG.
Bumpy days ahead!!!!
Unfortunately, the cards are already on the table for all to see!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82472
- Thanks: 6449
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
13 years 2 months ago
They are going to be talking about it tonight on Alec Hoggs radio show - SAFM 6pm
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Homer
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
13 years 2 months ago
Actually I don't share the excitement shown by others on the merger being disallowed. The press release focusses mainly on the issue of competition (which is propably the Commissions job) but W/Cape is not currently sound. I would think the focus should be to get it on a sound footing first irrespective of who is the willing buyer and then worry about other issues. Maybe the Appeal Board thinks a bit further....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.121 seconds