PHENOMENAL
- Mac
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 12013
- Thanks: 940
Re: Re: PHENOMENAL
12 years 11 months ago
pirates Wrote:
> naresh plenty 3yos won that race be noble and i
> think zamit as well..that was a top race and why
> they scrapped that race and the season ending
> champion stakes at greyville beggars fcuking
> belief...
One of the sweetest wins I have ever had was Poetic winning this race (John Skeaping).
I think she was a 4yo then
> naresh plenty 3yos won that race be noble and i
> think zamit as well..that was a top race and why
> they scrapped that race and the season ending
> champion stakes at greyville beggars fcuking
> belief...
One of the sweetest wins I have ever had was Poetic winning this race (John Skeaping).

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pirates
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Solotrama
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: PHENOMENAL
12 years 11 months ago
mr hawaii Wrote:
> It's a sprint Magi - Millard once put a
> two-year-old Filly in a GR I Sprint and she ran
> 4th - Over ground yes they can get rolled but just
> because a horse is only a one-time-winner does not
> mean it can not beat multiple winners - 90% of the
> time the MR is the best guide
STEAMING JUNGLE
> It's a sprint Magi - Millard once put a
> two-year-old Filly in a GR I Sprint and she ran
> 4th - Over ground yes they can get rolled but just
> because a horse is only a one-time-winner does not
> mean it can not beat multiple winners - 90% of the
> time the MR is the best guide
STEAMING JUNGLE
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JustinV
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: PHENOMENAL
12 years 11 months ago
pirates Wrote:
> JustinV Wrote:
>
>
> > maybe when people understand that the horse did
> > not run off a 92 it ran off a 79 they will
> realise
> > that the horse actually isnt that highly
> > rated..and is still very competitive in
> handicaps
>
>
> please justin let it be you never going to change
> laager mentality pal...8 time winner always
> better than a 2 time winner just has to be won 6
> more races
thats because the 8 time winner has won its 8 races from 60 to 80 odd starts and the 2 time winner has won it from less than 10 starts..what says the 2 time winner wouldnt have won 10 races by the time it had as many starts???? thats the wrong mentality not mine...a MR is a MERIT Rating..not a WINS rating...president elect in race 7 is a 8 time winner..so why isnt it a group horse?? because it has had 50 starts at mr 74 level and picked up a win every now and then over the last few years..not because it is an above average animal..that is the beauty of the MR system
> JustinV Wrote:
>
>
> > maybe when people understand that the horse did
> > not run off a 92 it ran off a 79 they will
> realise
> > that the horse actually isnt that highly
> > rated..and is still very competitive in
> handicaps
>
>
> please justin let it be you never going to change
> laager mentality pal...8 time winner always
> better than a 2 time winner just has to be won 6
> more races
thats because the 8 time winner has won its 8 races from 60 to 80 odd starts and the 2 time winner has won it from less than 10 starts..what says the 2 time winner wouldnt have won 10 races by the time it had as many starts???? thats the wrong mentality not mine...a MR is a MERIT Rating..not a WINS rating...president elect in race 7 is a 8 time winner..so why isnt it a group horse?? because it has had 50 starts at mr 74 level and picked up a win every now and then over the last few years..not because it is an above average animal..that is the beauty of the MR system
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- naresh
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6390
- Thanks: 1499
Re: Re: PHENOMENAL
12 years 11 months ago
Mac Wrote:
> pirates Wrote:
>
>
> > naresh plenty 3yos won that race be noble and i
> > think zamit as well..that was a top race and
> why
> > they scrapped that race and the season ending
> > champion stakes at greyville beggars fcuking
> > belief...
>
> One of the sweetest wins I have ever had was
> Poetic winning this race (John Skeaping).
I
> think she was a 4yo then
Im only 34years. Before my time. Champion Stakes I do remember Olympic Duel beating Spanish Galliard on an objection. London News finishing unplaced after it won the July in the Champion Stakes.
> pirates Wrote:
>
>
> > naresh plenty 3yos won that race be noble and i
> > think zamit as well..that was a top race and
> why
> > they scrapped that race and the season ending
> > champion stakes at greyville beggars fcuking
> > belief...
>
> One of the sweetest wins I have ever had was
> Poetic winning this race (John Skeaping).

> think she was a 4yo then
Im only 34years. Before my time. Champion Stakes I do remember Olympic Duel beating Spanish Galliard on an objection. London News finishing unplaced after it won the July in the Champion Stakes.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JustinV
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: PHENOMENAL
12 years 11 months ago
the irony for me is it carried 61.5kgs because it was running in a rats and mice fm 76 handicap..if it ran in a fm90 it would have carried 54.5 and nobody would have said the handicappers have killed it etc etc..which doesnt make sense
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frodo
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 13198
- Thanks: 3103
Re: Re: PHENOMENAL
12 years 11 months ago
JustinV Wrote:
> the irony for me is it carried 61.5kgs because it
> was running in a rats and mice fm 76 handicap..if
> it ran in a fm90 it would have carried 54.5 and
> nobody would have said the handicappers have
> killed it etc etc..which doesnt make sense
Can't really agree with you, the question for me was why Phenomenal was rated 9 pounds above Extra Zing - and the race proved why - P did run of a 91 - a gross 91
> the irony for me is it carried 61.5kgs because it
> was running in a rats and mice fm 76 handicap..if
> it ran in a fm90 it would have carried 54.5 and
> nobody would have said the handicappers have
> killed it etc etc..which doesnt make sense
Can't really agree with you, the question for me was why Phenomenal was rated 9 pounds above Extra Zing - and the race proved why - P did run of a 91 - a gross 91

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JustinV
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: PHENOMENAL
12 years 11 months ago
Frodo Wrote:
> JustinV Wrote:
>
>
> > the irony for me is it carried 61.5kgs because
> it
> > was running in a rats and mice fm 76
> handicap..if
> > it ran in a fm90 it would have carried 54.5 and
> > nobody would have said the handicappers have
> > killed it etc etc..which doesnt make sense
>
>
> Can't really agree with you, the question for me
> was why Phenomenal was rated 9 pounds above Extra
> Zing - and the race proved why - P did run of a 91
> - a gross 91
gross and nets are way to confusing for some lol
> JustinV Wrote:
>
>
> > the irony for me is it carried 61.5kgs because
> it
> > was running in a rats and mice fm 76
> handicap..if
> > it ran in a fm90 it would have carried 54.5 and
> > nobody would have said the handicappers have
> > killed it etc etc..which doesnt make sense
>
>
> Can't really agree with you, the question for me
> was why Phenomenal was rated 9 pounds above Extra
> Zing - and the race proved why - P did run of a 91
> - a gross 91

gross and nets are way to confusing for some lol
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Magi
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9531
- Thanks: 1295
Re: Re: PHENOMENAL
12 years 11 months ago
JustinV Wrote:
> Frodo Wrote:
>
>
> > JustinV Wrote:
> >
>
>
> >
> > > the irony for me is it carried 61.5kgs
> because
> > it
> > > was running in a rats and mice fm 76
> > handicap..if
> > > it ran in a fm90 it would have carried 54.5
> and
> > > nobody would have said the handicappers have
> > > killed it etc etc..which doesnt make sense
> >
> >
> > Can't really agree with you, the question for
> me
> > was why Phenomenal was rated 9 pounds above
> Extra
> > Zing - and the race proved why - P did run of a
> 91
> > - a gross 91
>
>
> gross and nets are way to confusing for some lol
Is sort of like religion.... you have o take it on faith ..{shakes head meanders off for something cold and bracing}
> Frodo Wrote:
>
>
> > JustinV Wrote:
> >
>
>
> >
> > > the irony for me is it carried 61.5kgs
> because
> > it
> > > was running in a rats and mice fm 76
> > handicap..if
> > > it ran in a fm90 it would have carried 54.5
> and
> > > nobody would have said the handicappers have
> > > killed it etc etc..which doesnt make sense
> >
> >
> > Can't really agree with you, the question for
> me
> > was why Phenomenal was rated 9 pounds above
> Extra
> > Zing - and the race proved why - P did run of a
> 91
> > - a gross 91

>
>
> gross and nets are way to confusing for some lol
Is sort of like religion.... you have o take it on faith ..{shakes head meanders off for something cold and bracing}
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mikesack
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3350
- Thanks: 201
Re: Re: PHENOMENAL
12 years 11 months ago
Maybe not enough plate races, she could have run in a Novice or Grad Plate?In the past was good to watch them race figures go in a D div to C div then a B etc.Who said good horses didn't win with weight. Abbey Boy, Intellectual etc?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frodo
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 13198
- Thanks: 3103
Re: Re: PHENOMENAL
12 years 11 months ago
Sort of a catch 22 imo - not enough 'good' horses to contest the plate races - so we can't have too many of them - the operators do not want 3 and 4 horse fields - for obvious reasons - so no easy answer imo
That is not to say that Phenomenal should not contest another handicap - yes her MR will probably go up again - but today she has proved that she can win of that rating (which as Justinv has pointed out, is only a nett 79)
That is not to say that Phenomenal should not contest another handicap - yes her MR will probably go up again - but today she has proved that she can win of that rating (which as Justinv has pointed out, is only a nett 79)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Magi
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9531
- Thanks: 1295
Re: Re: PHENOMENAL
12 years 11 months ago
On the other hand Frodo... she may not race again... and come out in September and alas alack.... her MR has GONE UP by 13 points to 92 while she was resting...{deep sigh}... {meanders off for an even more bracing cold one}
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.117 seconds