Arlington Friday

Neither of these 2 fillies are going to Hollywood but don't leave them out of exotics as both Wayne and Sandile are trying to win.

South Ranger and Katie Em double for me.

hibernia Wrote:

---

> Sham Racing Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Under the Skirt there's a Stunning Girl.....
> >
> >
> > (we always hoping)
>
>
> no such thing as an ugly fanny ()


But there is Ugly Betty

Haupie Wrote:

---

> hibernia Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Sham Racing Wrote:
> >
>

---

>
> >

---

> > > Under the Skirt there's a Stunning Girl.....
> > >
> > >
> > > (we always hoping)
> >
> >
> > no such thing as an ugly fanny ()
>
>
> But there is Ugly Betty

hahaha....

Sham Racing Wrote:

---

> Englander, seems you sour to PE. Please understand
> that every trainer in PE ( actually in SA) is
> trying to get winners. Yes, sometimes the wrong
> one arrives but why do you think we all accept
> with the 2nd or 3rd runners, certainly not for
> them to be pacemakers !!
>
> Best bet for you would be a Pick 6 when you get
> the coupling so when the rough one arrives for a
> stable you still in there.
>
> Mark

Hi Mark,

Let me start with I LOVE Eastern Cape racing. You will see just last week I spoke on the forum about "the greed factor"

Respectfully I will not agree with that statement for every race a trainer enters. Generally YES off course " every trainer in PE ( actually in SA) is
trying to get winners" over a given time BUT what I would like to add to that is NOT in every race...some races the trainer is purely running the horse knowing that it will not win or even place for that matter and there is a multitude of reasons for this, but essentially to get a better price when it does run a suitable distance with a suitable jockey... this is a business after all and everyone is trying to make a buck.

I have also heard of many a trainers that does enter a horse to be a pacesetter to make sure the race is run at a true pace and know of many a trainer giving the jockey instructions for e.g. to run from behind when it knows the horse has a much better chance of winning going to the front. The Shams might be very transparent in all their horses trying but I for one certainly do not buy the argument that every trainer enters a horse in every race to win, one can just look at some of the no hopers entered in a race to see that that could not possibly be the case because surely that trainer cannot be that stupid to think the horse actually has a chance in that given race. Human behaviour is a wonderful thing... honestly I cannot accept that every trainer tries to win every race.

gregbucks Wrote:

---

> Hit Em hard boys...


what about the gals and not forgetting the ladyboys on the site?

hibernia Wrote:

---

> Sham Racing Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Under the Skirt there's a Stunning Girl.....
> >
> >
> > (we always hoping)
>
>
> no such thing as an ugly fanny ()


@hibernia, Your mate Ruby ........... may take offence to your above comment.

only a yankee for me today I have been of terrible form lately but it will come as always
Race 1 pretty caddy
Race 2 Placido
Race 7 South ranger
Race 8 Danavano

Haupie Wrote:

---

> hibernia Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Sham Racing Wrote:
> >
>

---

>
> >

---

> > > Under the Skirt there's a Stunning Girl.....
> > >
> > >
> > > (we always hoping)
> >
> >
> > no such thing as an ugly fanny ()
>
>
> But there is Ugly Betty


And Susan Boyle.

Looking at today's card some Pick 6 races all you need is 3 horses and you have the field. I am sure once again the Pick 6 dividend will be a fraction of the Jackpot.

shrek Wrote:

---

> Haupie Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > hibernia Wrote:
> >
>

---

>
> >

---

> > > Sham Racing Wrote:
> > >
> >
>

---

>
> >
> > >

---

> > > > Under the Skirt there's a Stunning
> Girl.....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (we always hoping)
> > >
> > >
> > > no such thing as an ugly fanny ()
> >
> >
> > But there is Ugly Betty
>
>
> And Susan Boyle.

lmao Morning Shrek <

shrek Wrote:

---

> Looking at today's card some Pick 6 races all you
> need is 3 horses and you have the field. I am sure
> once again the Pick 6 dividend will be a fraction
> of the Jackpot.


Agree with you Shrek... (tu)