Arlington Friday

Hit Em hard boys...

Gregsaw ( you expecting the same true to "form" results that we have seen at (Un)Fairview recently or are we in store for one or two complete no hopers to shock us all? Even if I say so myself...lmao!!! <

Englander Wrote:

---

> Gregsaw ( you expecting the same true to "form"
> results that we have seen at (Un)Fairview recently
> or are we in store for one or two complete no
> hopers to shock us all? Even if I say so
> myself...lmao!!! <


Engelsman, i haven't looked at the card... have you found some idiot selections??

Englander, seems you sour to PE. Please understand that every trainer in PE ( actually in SA) is trying to get winners. Yes, sometimes the wrong one arrives but why do you think we all accept with the 2nd or 3rd runners, certainly not for them to be pacemakers !!

Best bet for you would be a Pick 6 when you get the coupling so when the rough one arrives for a stable you still in there.

Mark

Under The Skirt...<

Under the Skirt there's a Stunning Girl.....


(we always hoping)

Sham Racing Wrote:

---

> Under the Skirt there's a Stunning Girl.....
>
>
> (we always hoping)


no such thing as an ugly fanny ()

All the best to the Shams tomorrow....
I really fancy cash counter ....

Sham Racing Wrote:

---

> Englander, seems you sour to PE. Please understand
> that every trainer in PE ( actually in SA) is
> trying to get winners. Yes, sometimes the wrong
> one arrives but why do you think we all accept
> with the 2nd or 3rd runners, certainly not for
> them to be pacemakers !!
>
> Best bet for you would be a Pick 6 when you get
> the coupling so when the rough one arrives for a
> stable you still in there.
>
> Mark

Good evening Mark Your "sour" comment, if I am honest, which I always try to be, is probably a fair assessment. But, only for the last month or so. And in some posts I have tried to make it clear that I think there could be many reasons for the current bout of surprise results in PE. Yes, it is to me, at the moment, a punters nightmare. But, speaking kind of personally, I have also done my utmost to try and make it absolutely clear that I have nothing but respect for the Shams. You have a 40/1 winner with a Dorrie comment of "could surprise" then I have absolutely no issues. I have recently backed many a Sham horse only for it to be the wrong one in the race but I have never blamed the stable, simply shown frustration at my own misfortune. That is the way it goes and I think (and hope ) if you were to look at my posts in that respect, that is all you would read. But, yes, trying to understand the possible inference and again trying to be as honest as I can be, I have issues with other trainers. That is because I don't feel that they are anywhere close to having the same transparency as yourselves. If a horse not included in a stables PA halves in price and wins then I scratch my head and think its odd, I think that is far from an unfair assessment. It can happen and I accept that but... let's leave it there

hibernia Wrote:

---

> Sham Racing Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Under the Skirt there's a Stunning Girl.....
> >
> >
> > (we always hoping)
>
>
> no such thing as an ugly fanny ()

depends how long you been around

Just hope we don't loose you from PE because of a few others...

We need all The Clan to continue to support PE.

Also enjoy your input and contributions, remember ours are all trying !!

Hi Mark

Any idea what Waynes feeling on the rides is? I find him very transparent as well and usually when he is excited about aride on your horses, its a good sign!