SPECTROSCOPE
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Justanotherpunter Wrote:
> www.formgrids.com/subscriber/fgRaceResult.a
> spx?rn=2013-04VR910,ZA&hs=SPECTROSCOPE
>
> 66-1 was yummy.
>
> Maybe one day you'll learn to talk less and listen
> more,but I've told you in the past that'll never
> happen.
>
> Back into retirement,bye bye.
So beating 1 horse home on surface debut makes it a good thing??? are you extracting the urine or have you once again cut back on your meds???
Got to luv the brainless hoverers that claim to hate the site but never miss a day to visit and then change nom de plumes so that they can post their nonsensical bollocks...once again proving without a doubt that in every bunch of roses there will always be a pr!ck.
> www.formgrids.com/subscriber/fgRaceResult.a
> spx?rn=2013-04VR910,ZA&hs=SPECTROSCOPE
>
> 66-1 was yummy.
>
> Maybe one day you'll learn to talk less and listen
> more,but I've told you in the past that'll never
> happen.
>
> Back into retirement,bye bye.
So beating 1 horse home on surface debut makes it a good thing??? are you extracting the urine or have you once again cut back on your meds???
Got to luv the brainless hoverers that claim to hate the site but never miss a day to visit and then change nom de plumes so that they can post their nonsensical bollocks...once again proving without a doubt that in every bunch of roses there will always be a pr!ck.
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
2013/04/23 11:44:41 AM 959820 HORSE RACING VAAL SAND Pick 6 1/ 1 2 3 4 7 8 10 11 12 14/ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12 13 14/ 2/ 1 2 3 4 5 7 9/ 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 11/ Banker - 0.00 1392.00 - - Result
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RACING GURU
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Titch Wrote:
> 2013/04/23 11:44:41 AM 959820 HORSE RACING VAAL
> SAND Pick 6 1/ 1 2 3 4 7 8 10 11 12 14/ 1 2 3 4 5
> 6 7 12 13 14/ 2/ 1 2 3 4 5 7 9/ 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9
> 11/ Banker - 0.00 1392.00 - - Result
sorry titch...thought u were an A.R.M....BUT STILL TITCH...R10000/500 bro,on each...made u a certain winner all round...next time phone me
> 2013/04/23 11:44:41 AM 959820 HORSE RACING VAAL
> SAND Pick 6 1/ 1 2 3 4 7 8 10 11 12 14/ 1 2 3 4 5
> 6 7 12 13 14/ 2/ 1 2 3 4 5 7 9/ 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9
> 11/ Banker - 0.00 1392.00 - - Result
sorry titch...thought u were an A.R.M....BUT STILL TITCH...R10000/500 bro,on each...made u a certain winner all round...next time phone me
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
The ARM in this instances was once again Justanotherpratt
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frodo
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 13198
- Thanks: 3103
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Titch Wrote:
> The ARM in this instances was once again
> Justanotherpratt
Not trying to echo JAP, but looking at that specific race behind Pylon, I think S was about 9 kg's better off with Silver Specialist on Tuesday, after having finished +/- 8 lenghts behind SS in the race won by Pylon (and probably not fully persevered with being so far behind) - so based on that run one had to give S a chance - and the fact that SS was about 10/1 and S 66/1 just shows that many missed that vital formline - including me
Always so easy afterwards.....
> The ARM in this instances was once again
> Justanotherpratt
Not trying to echo JAP, but looking at that specific race behind Pylon, I think S was about 9 kg's better off with Silver Specialist on Tuesday, after having finished +/- 8 lenghts behind SS in the race won by Pylon (and probably not fully persevered with being so far behind) - so based on that run one had to give S a chance - and the fact that SS was about 10/1 and S 66/1 just shows that many missed that vital formline - including me

Always so easy afterwards.....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Frodo Wrote:
> Titch Wrote:
>
>
> > The ARM in this instances was once again
> > Justanotherpratt
>
>
> Not trying to echo JAP, but looking at that
> specific race behind Pylon, I think S was about 9
> kg's better off with Silver Specialist on Tuesday,
> after having finished +/- 8 lenghts behind SS in
> the race won by Pylon (and probably not fully
> persevered with being so far behind) - so based on
> that run one had to give S a chance - and the fact
> that SS was about 10/1 and S 66/1 just shows that
> many missed that vital formline - including me
>
>
> Always so easy afterwards.....
Let me first say that Spectroscope cost me a Pick-6 that day.:X
It was one of those grrrr misses though........the horse had run on sand but had no official rating ,but if you ignored the winner (which was in a different race to the rest of the field) I had a provisional Sand rating of 73 ????
On the strength of that ,I needed to include it as "possibly well handicapped"
It wasn't obvious...........but not impossible as Zoro says!
> Titch Wrote:
>
>
> > The ARM in this instances was once again
> > Justanotherpratt
>
>
> Not trying to echo JAP, but looking at that
> specific race behind Pylon, I think S was about 9
> kg's better off with Silver Specialist on Tuesday,
> after having finished +/- 8 lenghts behind SS in
> the race won by Pylon (and probably not fully
> persevered with being so far behind) - so based on
> that run one had to give S a chance - and the fact
> that SS was about 10/1 and S 66/1 just shows that
> many missed that vital formline - including me

>
>
> Always so easy afterwards.....
Let me first say that Spectroscope cost me a Pick-6 that day.:X
It was one of those grrrr misses though........the horse had run on sand but had no official rating ,but if you ignored the winner (which was in a different race to the rest of the field) I had a provisional Sand rating of 73 ????
On the strength of that ,I needed to include it as "possibly well handicapped"
It wasn't obvious...........but not impossible as Zoro says!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Justanotherpunter
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
@ Titch,
"So beating 1 horse home on surface debut makes it a good thing??? "
This statement shows just how brain dead you actually are.Have you actually examined the run or are you merely just spewing the usual out of your brainless head.
It doesn't have to be a good thing,it's 66-1.
Rather back what your clever connections that ride horses tip you @ evens.
I'm no genius,nobody is in this game,but I just had to point out how clueless you really are.
Go look at the form properly,maybe you'll learn something for a change.
"So beating 1 horse home on surface debut makes it a good thing??? "
This statement shows just how brain dead you actually are.Have you actually examined the run or are you merely just spewing the usual out of your brainless head.
It doesn't have to be a good thing,it's 66-1.
Rather back what your clever connections that ride horses tip you @ evens.
I'm no genius,nobody is in this game,but I just had to point out how clueless you really are.
Go look at the form properly,maybe you'll learn something for a change.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
So Im clueless coz i left out a 66/1 shot in the pick 6 ya ya ya...as far as clueless and brain dead goes I will give you start in both departments pr!ck
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
I have really had enough of these ignorant punks that come on line to simply have a go and have sweet FA to contribute and certainly dont need to spend time here being insulted, so enjoy your pathetic self JAP im outta here...
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- heinrich
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2629
- Thanks: 483
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Titch Wrote:
> I have really had enough of these ignorant punks
> that come on line to simply have a go and have
> sweet FA to contribute and certainly dont need to
> spend time here being insulted, so enjoy your
> pathetic self JAP im outta here...
Nah Titch bra...dunno you...but stay!dont let them win!
> I have really had enough of these ignorant punks
> that come on line to simply have a go and have
> sweet FA to contribute and certainly dont need to
> spend time here being insulted, so enjoy your
> pathetic self JAP im outta here...
Nah Titch bra...dunno you...but stay!dont let them win!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Wouter
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
At JAP - did you play the P6 and did you catch it?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bloodshot
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Jeez guys are you all for real !! Everybody pointing out how clever or stupid everyone is after the fact? I know Rob F and if I were to listen anybody in this game it would be him and by his own admission he left the horse out? If this horse had not won this thread wouldn't be here but now that it's won everyone claiming to be geniuses . Come on guys we all work it out the way we believe is best and I for one get it wrong more times than right but to have a go at all and sundry cause some were right and some were wrong is crazy!! Just work it out on your own And listen to whoever you want and then do your own thing . F@$?! K me I'm tired of all the shit as well?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.111 seconds