SPECTROSCOPE
- BL
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Heinrich Angelo McphersonBUSINESS4LIFE
Took some EW on SPECTROSCOPE now...simply becoz i quite liked him last time out and made him a LS today....had a small bet on him becoz we dont have him in the P6....hope he doesnt win but runs a place.
Like · · Tuesday at 1:53pm via mobile ·
Took some EW on SPECTROSCOPE now...simply becoz i quite liked him last time out and made him a LS today....had a small bet on him becoz we dont have him in the P6....hope he doesnt win but runs a place.
Like · · Tuesday at 1:53pm via mobile ·
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Muhtiman
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9001
- Thanks: 1040
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Mmmm......this is simply called hedging.....often one has the exotic into the last leg and goes for a bit of cover on a spook....I once backed this very same dog trying to cover an exotic.... But brassed it last time as 1st run on sand was too shocking to warrant an inclusion
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
I left out 2 horses in the last leg of my 22% Pick 6, Spectroscope and Rock My World true to form they ran 1st and 2nd last, what I still cant get my head around is how anyone could make a case for Spectroscope given the exposed form :S maybe I should have done what Heinrich no doubt did and have a few bob on the 2 horses I did not have in the pick 6..something I did consider but just couldn't bring myself to do it
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- heinrich
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2629
- Thanks: 483
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
@Muthiman....i didnt hedge anything,but know what you mean.like i said previously...S was on the last page on my printed book...so i never gave him the day of time....so as soon as i realised he could win...i took ew.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Muhtiman
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9001
- Thanks: 1040
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
?.......Spectroscope is one of many horses that fall into my capable but unpredictable category.......I do not like the Spectrums as this is generally the types of pattern racing they display......they are capable in softer going and seem to take to sand but unpredictable and land up at the sand venue only because they battle to compete at the major centres.......
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- heinrich
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2629
- Thanks: 483
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Agree...SUGaR RAY and KINGS BOUNTY comes to mind aswell...but regarding S...you can see on breeding and the fact that he likes soft gona that he was gona like the sand...the light weight gave me more confidence.In the cape theres horse called Bashir...followed him...lost 3* in a row won the other day without my money...alot of them like S out there
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Muhtiman
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9001
- Thanks: 1040
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
heinrich Wrote:
> @Muthiman....i didnt hedge anything,but know what
> you mean.like i said previously...S was on the
> last page on my printed book...so i never gave him
> the day of time....so as soon as i realised he
> could win...i took ew.
then you don't know what hedging is........it is simply seeing that for some reason one overlooked a possibility and then realizing that one could be in trouble and take corrective measure.....many an astute punter do similar.......
> @Muthiman....i didnt hedge anything,but know what
> you mean.like i said previously...S was on the
> last page on my printed book...so i never gave him
> the day of time....so as soon as i realised he
> could win...i took ew.
then you don't know what hedging is........it is simply seeing that for some reason one overlooked a possibility and then realizing that one could be in trouble and take corrective measure.....many an astute punter do similar.......
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- heinrich
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2629
- Thanks: 483
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Yes M...i know thats what you mean.I dont do that as stuff like this happens almost never.(i mean missing something,its either i like you or dont)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- The Madji
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
I included Spectroscope in my quartet (paid R27k) as I recalled money for t at long odds and it faded late (a few runs back)..also thort may appreciate the surface....but on exposed form was pretty k@k to put it mildly.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- heinrich
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2629
- Thanks: 483
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
The Madji Wrote:
> I included Spectroscope in my quartet (paid R27k)
> as I recalled money for t at long odds and it
> faded late (a few runs back)..also thort may
> appreciate the surface....but on exposed form was
> pretty k@k to put it mildly.
I backed it on his previous run on the VAAL aswell as his running style at Greyville proved he was looking for the longer straight.
> I included Spectroscope in my quartet (paid R27k)
> as I recalled money for t at long odds and it
> faded late (a few runs back)..also thort may
> appreciate the surface....but on exposed form was
> pretty k@k to put it mildly.
I backed it on his previous run on the VAAL aswell as his running style at Greyville proved he was looking for the longer straight.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Justanotherpunter
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Titch Wrote:
> I left out 2 horses in the last leg of my 22% Pick
> 6, Spectroscope and Rock My World true to form
> they ran 1st and 2nd last, what I still cant get
> my head around is how anyone could make a case for
> Spectroscope given the exposed form :S maybe I
> should have done what Heinrich no doubt did and
> have a few bob on the 2 horses I did not have in
> the pick 6..something I did consider but just
> couldn't bring myself to do it
Maybe you should learn to study form.
Have a look at this run and you'll see how why you should in fact be punting it as opposed to leaving it out your p6.It was a monster run @ the weights in it's 1st run on the sand.
www.formgrids.com/subscriber/fgRaceResul...0,ZA&hs=SPECTROSCOPE
66-1 was yummy.
Maybe one day you'll learn to talk less and listen more,but I've told you in the past that'll never happen.
Back into retirement,bye bye.
> I left out 2 horses in the last leg of my 22% Pick
> 6, Spectroscope and Rock My World true to form
> they ran 1st and 2nd last, what I still cant get
> my head around is how anyone could make a case for
> Spectroscope given the exposed form :S maybe I
> should have done what Heinrich no doubt did and
> have a few bob on the 2 horses I did not have in
> the pick 6..something I did consider but just
> couldn't bring myself to do it
Maybe you should learn to study form.
Have a look at this run and you'll see how why you should in fact be punting it as opposed to leaving it out your p6.It was a monster run @ the weights in it's 1st run on the sand.
www.formgrids.com/subscriber/fgRaceResul...0,ZA&hs=SPECTROSCOPE
66-1 was yummy.
Maybe one day you'll learn to talk less and listen more,but I've told you in the past that'll never happen.
Back into retirement,bye bye.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RACING GURU
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: SPECTROSCOPE
12 years 3 months ago
Titch Wrote:
> I left out 2 horses in the last leg of my 22% Pick
> 6, Spectroscope and Rock My World true to form
> they ran 1st and 2nd last, what I still cant get
> my head around is how anyone could make a case for
> Spectroscope given the exposed form :S maybe I
> should have done what Heinrich no doubt did and
> have a few bob on the 2 horses I did not have in
> the pick 6..something I did consider but just
> couldn't bring myself to do it
u talk so much shit...ARM.....NOW U WANT US TO BELIEVE THAT U WERE GOING IN A P6..22%....PAYING NEARLY 160 000...AND U COULDNT THROW A MEAGRE R500 ON THE 2 HORSES U DIDNT HAVE IN.....WHAT WERE U WAITING FOR.....
> I left out 2 horses in the last leg of my 22% Pick
> 6, Spectroscope and Rock My World true to form
> they ran 1st and 2nd last, what I still cant get
> my head around is how anyone could make a case for
> Spectroscope given the exposed form :S maybe I
> should have done what Heinrich no doubt did and
> have a few bob on the 2 horses I did not have in
> the pick 6..something I did consider but just
> couldn't bring myself to do it
u talk so much shit...ARM.....NOW U WANT US TO BELIEVE THAT U WERE GOING IN A P6..22%....PAYING NEARLY 160 000...AND U COULDNT THROW A MEAGRE R500 ON THE 2 HORSES U DIDNT HAVE IN.....WHAT WERE U WAITING FOR.....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.107 seconds