Tellytrack

I have just called Multichoice, no decision has been made yet from their side as the matter is still under investigation, that is the official response they have been told to give customers as from March 3rd 2014.

So why is Tellytrack saying that it is closing as of 26th March 2014??

The reason - they do not know what day of the week it is !! - I remain convinced that Tellytrack decision makers are very
poor negotiators and inefficient and the day these executives including their oncourse presenters are replaced is nthe day things
will change/improve for viewers

When you see the history clearly laid out it makes one wonder why the operator is so bitterly opposed to Betfair. Betfair could be an additional 'no risk' facility for the operator where opposing views between punters are simply facilitated by the exchange.

Betfair would indubitably have added to wagering offerings in a novel and market expanding fashion and would probably have eroded the bookmaking competition a lot more than Saftote is ever likely to!

As per other threads I believe TT are hoping for A MIRACLE or dont give a sh*t.

If TT are saying they going off air and the official response from MC is that the matter is still under investigation, would the question then not be "is it coming from TT side that they are going off air and not from MC side?'

Guys its Mulltichoices decision,their reson being that the channel is not performing well enough..

As a director of any company in SA and more particular u have certain responsibilities that u can be personally held accountable for.

if u are found to be lying on record I would imagine that could be quite bad.

So who is lying MULTICHOICE OR SUBSIDIARY OF P??

A fiduciary duty[3] is the highest standard of care at either equity or law. A fiduciary (abbreviation fid) is expected to be extremely loyal to the person to whom he owes the duty (the "principal"): he must not put his personal interests before the duty, and must not profit from his position as a fiduciary, unless the principal consents.

When a fiduciary duty is imposed, equity requires a different, arguably stricter, standard of behavior than the comparable tortious duty of care at common law. It is said the fiduciary has a duty not to be in a situation where personal interests and fiduciary duty conflict, a duty not to be in a situation where his fiduciary duty conflicts with another fiduciary duty, and a duty not to profit from his fiduciary position without knowledge and consent. A fiduciary ideally would not have a conflict of interest. It has been said that fiduciaries must conduct themselves "at a level higher than that trodden by the crowd"[4] and that "[t]he distinguishing or overriding duty of a fiduciary is the obligation of undivided loyalty

A fiduciary is someone who has undertaken to act for and on behalf of another in a particular matter in circumstances which give rise to a relationship of trust and confidence.

Exactly Sylvester, I cannot understand who is making the call, if its MC then lets see a formal announcement, I asked for one today via mail and there is nonje only what they have been told to say as above???

You are only responsible if you get caught...