Bettingworld's own ante-post betting finished ?

Doublejimmy wrote: BW Account Holders probably got the Big Prices and then BW probably got screwed because they cant get anything back on what they were laying by the time the official betting got out. . So to stop that they most probably just thought to hell with it we'll price up with every one else.

Doublejimmy wrote: I agree a bookmaker should be prepared to lose 20K. But think about it. BW has how many branches and how many Clients with accounts. As soon as the Betting goes live how many People do you think try to get on that price on the internet alone, that excludes Punters waiting in the branches for betting to open. compared to a private bookmaker who has 1 branch somewhere and a few phone clients. You can see why they'd pull their ante post because like i said. they get screwed on a larger price and cant get anything back in the end. because every else has opens up at the low price.

oh yea Broken Mug can still hold some water

RACING GURU wrote: pirates/hilton....first 20k..is that all the liability they can afford...i say,there must be a person/persons out here who has about 5 bar in their kitty,,..and can lay head on what u like..do u think that that person would go bust or make a million a month

pirates wrote:

RACING GURU wrote: pirates/hilton....first 20k..is that all the liability they can afford...i say,there must be a person/persons out here who has about 5 bar in their kitty,,..and can lay head on what u like..do u think that that person would go bust or make a million a month

rg I don't know what liability they can afford but have been told by bookmakers that are involved in the claims that they show a loss every month on them ..hence the claims have been cut from the original amounts