"Group" RESULTS - 'Afternoon' Thursday 1st May Workings...
- Professional Player
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
"Group" RESULTS - 'Afternoon' Thursday 1st May Workings...
17 years 1 month ago
Afternoon.
This afternoon completed, and went as follows.....
The 1st runner we wanted 2.32, and with being around 2.5 on arrival and then dropping down to us and beyond (hit odds on), we had a lay at 2.32 max. The lay went and won a close finish by about 3 inches, so frustrating, but the way it goes........
The 2nd runner we wanted 2.1, and with being around 2.34 on arrival and only getting slightly bigger, we never see our lay price at any stage at all, so a race to avoid for all. The runner went and won well, so a good leave........
The 3rd runner we wanted 2.2, but a non runner and 4.9% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 2.14. The price was around 1.81 on arrival and shortening, so we had a lay at 1.81 max. The lay was nailed late as the weights kicked in, and the jockey was caught napping to be fair! so a good result........
The 4th runner we wanted 3.3, but a non runner and 2.9% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 3.23 (3.25 nearest exchange price). The price was a well supported 2.54 on arrival, so we had a lay at 2.54. The lay was nicely beaten and so a good result........
The 5th runner we wanted 2.7, and with being around 3.95 on arrival and only getting bigger, we never see our lay price at any stage at all, so all had to avoid the race. The runner went and won well, so a nice priced winner (returned 7/2 sp), but more importantly a good leave...........
The 6th runner we wanted 2.94, but a non runner and 13% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 2.69. The price was a well supported 2.06 on arrival and shortening, so we had a lay at 2.06 max. The lay went and won a close battling finish, so frustrating, but the way it goes. Traders easily got their trade back prices in running, so got away with it...........
The 7th runner we wanted 2.94, but a non runner and 11.1% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 2.72. The price was a well supported 2.04 on arrival and shortening, so we had a lay at around 2.04 max. The lay had to work hard, but got the win after a close battling finish, so the way it goes. Traders got their trade back prices in running, so got away with it.......
The 8th runner we wanted 2.32, but a non runner and 10.1% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 2.19 (2.2 nearest exchange price). The price was around 2.18 and slightly shorter on arrival, so we had a lay at 2.18 max. The lay went and won, so the way it goes, but only traders playing now, and with them easily getting their trade back prices in running, they got away with it..........
The 9th runner we wanted 2.4, and with being around 2.3 on arrival and shortening, we had a lay at around 2.3 max. The lay was nicely beaten, so a good result.......
The 10th and final runner we wanted 1.7, but a non runner and 7.1% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 1.65. The price was around 1.77 on arrival, so with being a bit high, over 20 minutes away, and only a tiny bit of trading left on offer - I'm off for a bite to eat before the evening session...
'VERY' WELL PLAYED/BATTLED.....................(2 from the first 2 (100%) went and won - then 6 won from the first 8 (75%) - and so ultra tough, but pleased to say we came through to get the wages, which was a terrific effort. Well played guys.)
'Rolling' strategy/target players (no 'free' lays for them) Won 0.4 of a target at worst...Although a target was easily achievable with gaining those slightly better prices........They started their 1st strategy/target on the 1st runner, and after a poor start, they then bobbed and weaved their way through far too many winners, and ended up winning 0.4 of a target at the very worst after their 5th lay (the 7th runner). I am aware that a target was easily achievable with gaining slightly better prices, but the results mail to average/worst scenario as always....
'Bank building' strategy/target players had their 1st lay (the 1st runner) at 2.32 max, but a poor result see them go behind early..........They then had their 2nd lay (the 3rd runner) at 1.81 max, and a good result see them back level.............They then had their 3rd lay (the 4th runner) at 2.54, and a good result see 4 runner builders hit their targets.......
5 runner builders needed a tiny bit more (at the very worst - slightly better prices gained and they'd have hit too!), and so they went to their 4th lay (the 6th runner) at 2.06 max, but a poor result see them give a little back.........They then went to their 5th and final lay (the 7th runner) at 2.04 max, but another poor result see them give a bit more back, and end the session winning 0.4 of a target at the very worst. I am aware a target was achievable with slightly better prices, but the results mail always to the average/worst scenario....
Bank builder 4 runner strategy/target. £400 bank. Max 25% target £100.
1st lay £100 to win as much of the £100 target @ 2.32 max. Result negative. Lose £100
Total bank now £300
2nd lay £100 to recoup the £100 @ 1.81 max. Result positive. Win £100
Total bank now £400
3rd lay £200 to win the £100 target @ 2.54. Result positive. Win £100
Total bank now £500
Overall result. Target hit.
****************************************
Bank builder 5 runner strategy/target. £500 bank. Max 25% target £100
1st lay £80 to win as much of the £100 target @ 2.32 max. Result negative. Lose £80
Total bank now £320
2nd lay £80 to recoup the £80 @ 1.81 max. Result positive. Win £80
Total bank now £400
3rd lay £133 to win as much of the £100 target @ 2.54. Result positive. Win £86
Total bank now £486
4th lay £243 to win the remaining £14 @ 2.06 max. Result negative. Lose £15
Total bank now £471
5th lay £471 to win the remaining £29 @ 2.04 max. Result negative. Lose £30
Total bank now £441
Overall result. Win 0.4 of a target at the very worst.
I am aware that a target was easily achievable with gaining slightly better prices, but the results mail always to the average/worst scenario.
****************************************
Traders had to concede a little on the 1st runner at 2.32 max, but all others see them win a bit, or break level, so they end around levels, or losing a very little, which is a good result looking back with all those winners...
So a cracking effort guys, as far too many winners again to bob and weave through, but we all played a blinder and got the wages! So great stuff and speak soon..........
Marc.
****************************************************
Morning.
The races, runners, and prices, to work around for this afternoon then, as follows....
2.40 Hereford. OH CRICK (2.5)
Our price 13/8 (2.625) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 2.32 or under, we'll go in for a lay.
2.50 Folkestone. MAIMOONA (2.24)
Our price 7/5 (2.4) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 2.1 or under, we'll go in for a lay. *Please note that a 'little' more emphasis has gone on the early markets for clues, concerning this race*
3.00 Redcar. STEVIE THUNDER (1.99)
Our price 6/4 (2.5) and so a LAY is the call at current odds. We'd lay up to 2.2 or under.
3.10 Hereford. ARCTIC MAGIC (3.3)
Our price 13/5 (3.6) and so a LAY is the call at current odds. We'd lay up to 3.3 or under.
3.20 Folkestone. LUMINOUS GOLD (3.05)
Our price 2/1 (3.0) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 2.7 or under, we'll go in for a lay.
3.30 Redcar. STORYLAND (2.68)
Our price 9/4 (3.25) and so a LAY is the call at current odds. We'd lay up to 2.94 or under. *Please note that a 'little' more emphasis has gone on the early markets for clues, concerning this race*
4.20 Folkestone. TOPAZES (2.74)
Our price 9/4 (3.25) and so a LAY is the call at current odds. We'd lay up to 2.94 or under.
4.30 Redcar. TAJWEED (2.46)
Our price 13/8 (2.625) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 2.32 or under, we'll go in for a lay. *Traders be aware that he's shown a tendency to lead, or race prominently in his races*
4.50 Folkestone. FORESIGHT (2.9)
Our price 17/10 (2.7) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 2.4 or under, we'll go in for a lay. *Please note that more emphasis has gone on the early markets for clues, concerning this race*
5.20 Folkestone. NUTKIN (1.82)
Our price Evens (2.0) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 1.7 or under, we'll go in for a lay.
All races priced up with non runners taken into account, up until 10:00am.
That's what we have to work on for this afternoon then. Discipline to the maximum and take advantage of any prices that come our way. Again never easy (never is), but we have enough within our armoury to warrant going into battle, so good luck guys and speak soon with this evening's workings...
Marc.
This afternoon completed, and went as follows.....
The 1st runner we wanted 2.32, and with being around 2.5 on arrival and then dropping down to us and beyond (hit odds on), we had a lay at 2.32 max. The lay went and won a close finish by about 3 inches, so frustrating, but the way it goes........
The 2nd runner we wanted 2.1, and with being around 2.34 on arrival and only getting slightly bigger, we never see our lay price at any stage at all, so a race to avoid for all. The runner went and won well, so a good leave........
The 3rd runner we wanted 2.2, but a non runner and 4.9% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 2.14. The price was around 1.81 on arrival and shortening, so we had a lay at 1.81 max. The lay was nailed late as the weights kicked in, and the jockey was caught napping to be fair! so a good result........
The 4th runner we wanted 3.3, but a non runner and 2.9% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 3.23 (3.25 nearest exchange price). The price was a well supported 2.54 on arrival, so we had a lay at 2.54. The lay was nicely beaten and so a good result........
The 5th runner we wanted 2.7, and with being around 3.95 on arrival and only getting bigger, we never see our lay price at any stage at all, so all had to avoid the race. The runner went and won well, so a nice priced winner (returned 7/2 sp), but more importantly a good leave...........
The 6th runner we wanted 2.94, but a non runner and 13% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 2.69. The price was a well supported 2.06 on arrival and shortening, so we had a lay at 2.06 max. The lay went and won a close battling finish, so frustrating, but the way it goes. Traders easily got their trade back prices in running, so got away with it...........
The 7th runner we wanted 2.94, but a non runner and 11.1% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 2.72. The price was a well supported 2.04 on arrival and shortening, so we had a lay at around 2.04 max. The lay had to work hard, but got the win after a close battling finish, so the way it goes. Traders got their trade back prices in running, so got away with it.......
The 8th runner we wanted 2.32, but a non runner and 10.1% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 2.19 (2.2 nearest exchange price). The price was around 2.18 and slightly shorter on arrival, so we had a lay at 2.18 max. The lay went and won, so the way it goes, but only traders playing now, and with them easily getting their trade back prices in running, they got away with it..........
The 9th runner we wanted 2.4, and with being around 2.3 on arrival and shortening, we had a lay at around 2.3 max. The lay was nicely beaten, so a good result.......
The 10th and final runner we wanted 1.7, but a non runner and 7.1% reduction meant we now wanted a lay price of 1.65. The price was around 1.77 on arrival, so with being a bit high, over 20 minutes away, and only a tiny bit of trading left on offer - I'm off for a bite to eat before the evening session...
'VERY' WELL PLAYED/BATTLED.....................(2 from the first 2 (100%) went and won - then 6 won from the first 8 (75%) - and so ultra tough, but pleased to say we came through to get the wages, which was a terrific effort. Well played guys.)
'Rolling' strategy/target players (no 'free' lays for them) Won 0.4 of a target at worst...Although a target was easily achievable with gaining those slightly better prices........They started their 1st strategy/target on the 1st runner, and after a poor start, they then bobbed and weaved their way through far too many winners, and ended up winning 0.4 of a target at the very worst after their 5th lay (the 7th runner). I am aware that a target was easily achievable with gaining slightly better prices, but the results mail to average/worst scenario as always....
'Bank building' strategy/target players had their 1st lay (the 1st runner) at 2.32 max, but a poor result see them go behind early..........They then had their 2nd lay (the 3rd runner) at 1.81 max, and a good result see them back level.............They then had their 3rd lay (the 4th runner) at 2.54, and a good result see 4 runner builders hit their targets.......
5 runner builders needed a tiny bit more (at the very worst - slightly better prices gained and they'd have hit too!), and so they went to their 4th lay (the 6th runner) at 2.06 max, but a poor result see them give a little back.........They then went to their 5th and final lay (the 7th runner) at 2.04 max, but another poor result see them give a bit more back, and end the session winning 0.4 of a target at the very worst. I am aware a target was achievable with slightly better prices, but the results mail always to the average/worst scenario....
Bank builder 4 runner strategy/target. £400 bank. Max 25% target £100.
1st lay £100 to win as much of the £100 target @ 2.32 max. Result negative. Lose £100
Total bank now £300
2nd lay £100 to recoup the £100 @ 1.81 max. Result positive. Win £100
Total bank now £400
3rd lay £200 to win the £100 target @ 2.54. Result positive. Win £100
Total bank now £500
Overall result. Target hit.
****************************************
Bank builder 5 runner strategy/target. £500 bank. Max 25% target £100
1st lay £80 to win as much of the £100 target @ 2.32 max. Result negative. Lose £80
Total bank now £320
2nd lay £80 to recoup the £80 @ 1.81 max. Result positive. Win £80
Total bank now £400
3rd lay £133 to win as much of the £100 target @ 2.54. Result positive. Win £86
Total bank now £486
4th lay £243 to win the remaining £14 @ 2.06 max. Result negative. Lose £15
Total bank now £471
5th lay £471 to win the remaining £29 @ 2.04 max. Result negative. Lose £30
Total bank now £441
Overall result. Win 0.4 of a target at the very worst.
I am aware that a target was easily achievable with gaining slightly better prices, but the results mail always to the average/worst scenario.
****************************************
Traders had to concede a little on the 1st runner at 2.32 max, but all others see them win a bit, or break level, so they end around levels, or losing a very little, which is a good result looking back with all those winners...
So a cracking effort guys, as far too many winners again to bob and weave through, but we all played a blinder and got the wages! So great stuff and speak soon..........
Marc.
****************************************************
Morning.
The races, runners, and prices, to work around for this afternoon then, as follows....
2.40 Hereford. OH CRICK (2.5)
Our price 13/8 (2.625) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 2.32 or under, we'll go in for a lay.
2.50 Folkestone. MAIMOONA (2.24)
Our price 7/5 (2.4) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 2.1 or under, we'll go in for a lay. *Please note that a 'little' more emphasis has gone on the early markets for clues, concerning this race*
3.00 Redcar. STEVIE THUNDER (1.99)
Our price 6/4 (2.5) and so a LAY is the call at current odds. We'd lay up to 2.2 or under.
3.10 Hereford. ARCTIC MAGIC (3.3)
Our price 13/5 (3.6) and so a LAY is the call at current odds. We'd lay up to 3.3 or under.
3.20 Folkestone. LUMINOUS GOLD (3.05)
Our price 2/1 (3.0) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 2.7 or under, we'll go in for a lay.
3.30 Redcar. STORYLAND (2.68)
Our price 9/4 (3.25) and so a LAY is the call at current odds. We'd lay up to 2.94 or under. *Please note that a 'little' more emphasis has gone on the early markets for clues, concerning this race*
4.20 Folkestone. TOPAZES (2.74)
Our price 9/4 (3.25) and so a LAY is the call at current odds. We'd lay up to 2.94 or under.
4.30 Redcar. TAJWEED (2.46)
Our price 13/8 (2.625) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 2.32 or under, we'll go in for a lay. *Traders be aware that he's shown a tendency to lead, or race prominently in his races*
4.50 Folkestone. FORESIGHT (2.9)
Our price 17/10 (2.7) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 2.4 or under, we'll go in for a lay. *Please note that more emphasis has gone on the early markets for clues, concerning this race*
5.20 Folkestone. NUTKIN (1.82)
Our price Evens (2.0) and so no bets can be advised at current odds. If we see 1.7 or under, we'll go in for a lay.
All races priced up with non runners taken into account, up until 10:00am.
That's what we have to work on for this afternoon then. Discipline to the maximum and take advantage of any prices that come our way. Again never easy (never is), but we have enough within our armoury to warrant going into battle, so good luck guys and speak soon with this evening's workings...
Marc.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.093 seconds