Interbet

OTA I'm saying same thing on other thread

Lucky and tarry money against is making me want to watch, will drift

wait for close to race time and then compare.Interbet far higher odds and thats for sure.Dont use them for doubles rather use them for far higher outright prices aswell as higher place odds.

Englander wrote: I didn't realise you were disagreeing with me Dave. You certainly have not said anything which would make the initial post of this thread seem inaccurate. You seem more intent on making the issue "personal" which is beyond my understanding as to why you would wish to do so. As I have said before, it is about getting punters best prices from as many sources as possible, I fail to see a problem or what is so wrong with that.

Didn't realise I was getting "personal".
If you can get punters better prices by having a pop at a firm,then all good.But unless your Florence Nightingale I can't see what benefit that would have for you personally.It's the laying of bets that is the bigger issue In my opinion,if your a punter that bets in small stakes then that's not a big issue and you should be able to shop around.
I've got no problem with Interbet or Hollywood who I think have been sponsoring the site from day one.If I punted with them and they offered me 10% of a reasonable size bet,then I would feel aggrieved,but like you I don't punt with overseas bookmakers.

Didn't realise I was getting "personal".
If you can get punters better prices by having a pop at a firm,then all good.But unless your Florence Nightingale I can't see what benefit that would have for you personally.

There you have it in your own words Dave.
I repeat it is completely irrelevant as to whether or not I bet with them or anyone else. I was simply commenting on something that I think is "poor" for the punter. What I personally do, or anyone else for that matter, is of no consequence to the thread.

Ok.
This is making me dizzy,I will stay off your threads in the future.

davetheflower wrote: .
swerve them and if you never use them it's irrelevant.

You can’t swerve them if you don’t know about it.

After this thread and some 750 views, at least a few more will know about it.

A 5% and upward discrepancy is HUGE – and anybody that thinks that “getting on” is all that matters needs to look at the math.

Over the Air wrote: What did they lay? I bet you it was to lose less than 30k.

As an aside, Zaki 1st timers I would lay happily at odds on. Plenty examples of these good things getting rolled. Now Paul Peter and Lucky Houdalakis I would worry about a lot more.

Loose lips sink ships so they say the dogs been barking about this one for months. Lets see if this is as good as they say it is.

On the exchange

220k traded

13/10 to 31/20