Interbet

The prices this company offers on their bookmaking arm, and thus for multiples, seem to me to be comparatively p1ss poor, it is very rare I ever see them with a price higher than another firm.

They must also be one of the worst for high deductions on scratchings.

I assume the low "bookmaker" prices are there partly to try and push punters on to their "exchange" where, though they do occasionally have prices better than others, they hit you with a 3% charge on winnings I believe.

Whilst I agree with Bob, it is best to have as many accounts as possible so you can choose best odds etc etc, I think it is about time this company started to treat punters with a little more decency and offer fair prices on their bookmaking arm.

Does anyone disagree? Am I being unreasonable?

Are scratchings not the same with every bookie ? They are in the UK

If their prices are that much out I'm sure the punter would let them know by not placing bets ?

Their bookie arm is only get stronger and stronger imo,wait and see

The punter is letting them know Bob, read my post lol Many others are a little sheepish in posting in case you hadn't noticed so I am trying to speak for the silent masses lol

Compare their bookmaker prices with Hwood for Scottsville tomorrow... and no, I haven't checked so by all means show me to be wrong if you wish.

And no, I think Interbet have higher deductions than others in some cases but again, happy to be shown to be wrong, don't mean to be unfair after all.

Check their terms and conditions deductions will be in there

I don't think I need to Bob, I am pretty sure of it

I must say since they sold yes I agree and the limits are very low

I think Englander is right about the prices (last time I checked ,which was a while ago) and for that reason I ONLY use the exchange section where prices can often be the best available ,even nett of the additional 3%.

Englander wrote: The prices this company offers on their bookmaking arm, and thus for multiples, seem to me to be comparatively p1ss poor, it is very rare I ever see them with a price higher than another firm.

They must also be one of the worst for high deductions on scratchings.

Does anyone disagree? Am I being unreasonable?

You are correct Englander - piss poor. Deductions are very often higher - don't know what they use for SP. BWorld or Holly 0%, they hit you with 10%.
They also hit you with this com. charge on any multiple you take on any sport - how they can do this is beyond me. It appears in their t&c's , but how did the gambling board approve it?

There is only a commission charge with bets taken on the exchange. If you take any bet on their new site 3 or more legs get 10% bonus on your winnings.

Years ago I opened an Interbet account. Phoned in numerous times and emails to update my Banking Details as I had nothing filled in but had no response or no one assisted me when I phoned in. I forget my password so when they ran the compo recently, I tried retrieving my password again but still no one has contacted me!

Whiteline Fever wrote: There is only a commission charge with bets taken on the exchange. If you take any bet on their new site 3 or more legs get 10% bonus on your winnings.

Look in their t & c's - 3% "bucket shop" com. on all multiples.. They may give 10% bonus (many others do) but at the end you pay 3% com. - win one and see what happens.

Whiteline Fever wrote: There is only a commission charge with bets taken on the exchange. If you take any bet on their new site 3 or more legs get 10% bonus on your winnings.

The bonus is designed to try and make up for the fact they only use ruling prices on multiples, whereas Hollywood etc. use stretches for each leg!