Proteas on fire

Understand boet. But i dont know why i just have this nagging feeling that SA will finish the stronger. I watched a lik this morning and at a stage AB n Amla both in their innings looked real comfy

ShezaPunter wrote: Understand boet. But i dont know why i just have this nagging feeling that SA will finish the stronger. I watched a lik this morning and at a stage AB n Amla both in their innings looked real comfy

I love your optimism sheza. It appears to be working as Liverpool are coming along pretty nicely at the moment. Just goes to show what a poor manager Rodgers is.

Karma wrote: Don't know if you caught any of the aus nz test. Williamson at the moment is in a different class. Johnson and starc had all jumping and he didn't seem flustered at all. He is really impressive.

yes he is really a great player karma, but those Aussies just seem to churn out world class player year after year. Warner, since he became a father, has grown up and is just concentrating on playing rather than been a dick on the field and its paying dividends.

I'll stick my neck out and say that SA has no chance in this Test.
India won the toss and that was that.
Their spinners will take us apart on what is a doctored pitch.

Morning all our guys r not looking too bad now neh?

At least in with a small chance - but I fear a case of too little, too late - we could not reach 200 in the first innings, so why would me manage it in the 2nd when the pitch is even worse - not impossible that it will be all over by the close of play

I will stick me neck out and say-

We win IF Faf bats for a long period of time.
We lose if Faf doesn't bat for along period of time.

Van Zyl, much prefers pace on the ball, Elgar also prefers the pace. Hash been out of form this tour, AB, well its just AB. Basically imo the result revolves around Faf's batting performance, as he is in a key position, and he is behind AB, probably our best player of spin. Coming in at 3, crutial he performs. If AB is in to early, means we 3 down, and although he will most probably put in a good showing, will be all in vain.

chicken n chips wrote:

ShezaPunter wrote: Understand boet. But i dont know why i just have this nagging feeling that SA will finish the stronger. I watched a lik this morning and at a stage AB n Amla both in their innings looked real comfy

I love your optimism sheza. It appears to be working as Liverpool are coming along pretty nicely at the moment. Just goes to show what a poor manager Rodgers is.

Boet thanks its just because without a lil bit of optimism n hope theres no point in picking a team and watching the game.

I mean its been really difficult to be a liverpool fan recently especially being in dbn the stick i get from man u fans is hectic, but we have to keep following our team which ever it may b with a small amount of optisim, not stupidity though.

chicken n chips wrote: A lead of 220 will be enough for India to win this match. SA need quick wickets

Well 218 is close enough. Can't see SA getting these runs

Left handlers look more " comfortable" on this wicket. Next 45 minutes is the key

Frodo wrote: At least in with a small chance - but I fear a case of too little, too late - we could not reach 200 in the first innings, so why would me manage it in the 2nd when the pitch is even worse - not impossible that it will be all over by the close of play

109 all out.

Sometimes I hate it to be right