Flamingo Park Monday

You okes are just so phucking full of shit!!! Absolute damned if you do damned if you dont. Ziets, just carry on with your stuff and stay off the forum.... Same as 95% of trainers...There is nothing in it for you to try and provide feedback and quite honestly what are these people to you anyway....Quim sabe?.......

Flaunt, I would not entirely disagree that there is an element of throw them in and hope but I would say for the most part that this is often because there are not enough suitable options for racing, for the bigger yards surely you need to take into account that for a lot of each stable's horses the number of available races are limited. In plenty other centres there is a lot more racing and options.

Never had a problem with Ziets or the Human yard, in fact I think it has been fairly obvious that I have a lot of time for the guy and my "well done" to them was genuine. Also no secret, I have a major problem with transparency countrywide and that there are, imo, plenty other stables far more deserving of having a critical eye cast over them.

Magi wrote: You okes are just so phucking full of shit!!! Absolute damned if you do damned if you dont. Ziets, just carry on with your stuff and stay off the forum.... Same as 95% of trainers...There is nothing in it for you to try and provide feedback and quite honestly what are these people to you anyway....Quim sabe?.......

Really Magi????...................Ziets got a WhatsApp before the meeting started ,which merely asked which horses were on the affected float ...........read but ignored!!!!!!
BTW,the last few backed winners from stables that post here forgot to post those days anyway .....Your point is spot on ..........."what are these people to you anyway" .......exactly why expecting "inside info" is naïve. :ohmy:
It is the owners on the forum that have been generous with assistance!
I am on record as stating that we are not entitled to stable info
anyway .........................but suggesting all 25 horses were at a disadvantage was,IMO, misleading........that is different!

(I do my ratings and take no notice of "fancied" horses ,but if something adversely affects the form ,that is relevant and would have liked it clarified...............say it as it is, or say nothing at all...........is that not fair enough)

rob faux wrote:

Magi wrote: You okes are just so phucking full of shit!!! Absolute damned if you do damned if you dont. Ziets, just carry on with your stuff and stay off the forum.... Same as 95% of trainers...There is nothing in it for you to try and provide feedback and quite honestly what are these people to you anyway....Quim sabe?.......

Really Magi????...................Ziets got a WhatsApp before the meeting started ,which merely asked which horses were on the affected float ...........read but ignored!!!!!!
BTW,the last few backed winners from stables that post here forgot to post those days anyway .....Your point is spot on ..........."what are these people to you anyway" .......exactly why expecting "inside info" is naïve. :ohmy:
It is the owners on the forum that have been generous with assistance!
I am on record as stating that we are not entitled to stable info
anyway .........................but suggesting all 25 horses were at a disadvantage was,IMO, misleading........that is different!

I have been reading and posting on this forum for 7 or 8 years.In this time i have read various trainers post here,trainers starting out.A few have attracted owners from this forum/formed friendships.And it always ends the same where they just fade away or caught up in the game. The wheel does turn.I have seen trainers who feel they are above the rest come tumbling down to reality. A trainers licence or assistants licence doesnt mean they know whats going on.Its a long road.