Scottsville Wednesday thread
- Dave Scott
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 43867
- Thanks: 3338
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dave Scott
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 43867
- Thanks: 3338
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bokked
-
Topic Author
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 886
- Thanks: 168
Re: Re:Scottsville Wednesday thread
8 years 1 month agodurbs wrote: Are you 100% sure Valcar would have beaten Flamboyant Bokked?
I am 100% sure VALCAR would have won
He was finishing at the 300m and flamboyant stopped its run
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- durbs
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8043
- Thanks: 2157
Re: Re:Scottsville Wednesday thread
8 years 1 month ago
Marcus objecting now.What chance has he got if the stipes didn't think there was cause for an objection?Can't make themselves look stupid.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bokked
-
Topic Author
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 886
- Thanks: 168
Re: Re:Scottsville Wednesday thread
8 years 1 month ago
Now there is an objection
The circus continues!
The circus continues!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- The Tipsters Corner
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Scottsville Wednesday thread
8 years 1 month ago
Allerston is an Ar$3h0le from my side. With a capital "A"
States no further action but that was the outcome for the race review for horse that ran 3rd.
Hope punters didn't throw away their tickets
States no further action but that was the outcome for the race review for horse that ran 3rd.
Hope punters didn't throw away their tickets
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- The Tipsters Corner
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Scottsville Wednesday thread
8 years 1 month ago
Real Cock Smoker!
If Marcus was not carried out, he should have won atleast by a head!
If Marcus was not carried out, he should have won atleast by a head!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dave Scott
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 43867
- Thanks: 3338
Re: Scottsville Wednesday thread
8 years 1 month ago
Cant blame him imo
The race review was based on third horse and no further action but watching it you would have to believe that there might have been a problem with the winner coming onto the second horse ???
Lets see have given up on objections
The race review was based on third horse and no further action but watching it you would have to believe that there might have been a problem with the winner coming onto the second horse ???
Lets see have given up on objections
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bokked
-
Topic Author
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 886
- Thanks: 168
Re: Scottsville Wednesday thread
8 years 1 month ago
During the race I called it. To me was as clear as day
And the winner impeded the third horse
How there was no initial race review, I just don't know
And the winner impeded the third horse
How there was no initial race review, I just don't know
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bokked
-
Topic Author
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 886
- Thanks: 168
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- The Tipsters Corner
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Scottsville Wednesday thread
8 years 1 month ago
Finally justice has prevails! Anyways Marcus had 2 mounts. Which this was a blinder!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dave Scott
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 43867
- Thanks: 3338
Re: Scottsville Wednesday thread
8 years 1 month ago
Upheld lol
Good for the punters but still have to scratch my head
Imo correct result now
Good for the punters but still have to scratch my head
Imo correct result now
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.129 seconds