Objection to Gold Circle licence renewal

Adams wrote: Post removed to avoid offense [/quoteso

so you a supreme being hey ?
my fuckin arse

Amazing - 1st race replay there is no post race interview – on the rest you can listen to the praises and thank you’s to your heart’s content

fingers wrote: Amazing - 1st race replay there is no post race interview – on the rest you can listen to the praises and thank you’s to your heart’s content

I would rather comment predictable. This is how racing in this country is run. Ostriches would be proud

Firstly by omitting the interview gc bring more bad publicity onto themselves which they dont need and secondly what happened to the notion of freedom of speech?

mydada wrote:

Adams wrote: Post removed to avoid offense [/quoteso

so you a supreme being hey ?
my fuckin arse

.? Having a bad day mydada.....if i knew where the delete button was i would have used it. Precisely to avoid this kind of ranting. I posted something.....after reviewing it, which imo was nothing offensive ...i figured at least somebody on the group would be drinking, have lost a lot of money, or jfor some other reason might take offense.....so i removed it.........lol.....stilk illicited this kind of response.

Since you asked...i find the objection to be ridiculous, and do not doubt that it will have no success......on the issue of grooms, certainly as in any industry lets look at tgeir conditions and give them a fair deal.

I think your totally disgusting response sums up what is actually behind the objection, but it is misguided and frivoulous, doomed to fail

Adams wrote:

mydada wrote:

Adams wrote: Post removed to avoid offense [/quoteso

so you a supreme being hey ?
my fuckin arse

.? Having a bad day mydada.....if i knew where the delete button was i would have used it. Precisely to avoid this kind of ranting. I posted something.....after reviewing it, which imo was nothing offensive ...i figured at least somebody on the group would be drinking, have lost a lot of money, or jfor some other reason might take offense.....so i removed it.........lol.....stilk illicited this kind of response.

Bad days are a thing of the past ,and as always your ilk have the knack of turning things around


no ducks and dives and unnescessary words...what did you mean by your original statement

Adams wrote: Since you asked...i find the objection to be ridiculous, and do not doubt that it will have no success......on the issue of grooms, certainly as in any industry lets look at tgeir conditions and give them a fair deal.

I think your totally disgusting response sums up what is actually behind the objection, but it is misguided and frivoulous, doomed to fail

i asked you nothing about the topic

mydada wrote:

Adams wrote:

mydada wrote:

Adams wrote: Post removed to avoid offense [/quoteso

so you a supreme being hey ?
my fuckin arse

.? Having a bad day mydada.....if i knew where the delete button was i would have used it. Precisely to avoid this kind of ranting. I posted something.....after reviewing it, which imo was nothing offensive ...i figured at least somebody on the group would be drinking, have lost a lot of money, or jfor some other reason might take offense.....so i removed it.........lol.....stilk illicited this kind of response.

Bad days are a thing of the past ,and as always your ilk have the knack of turning things around


no ducks and dives and unnescessary words...what did you mean by your original statement

No mydada -- I found your post uncouth, and unfitting -- as such we will not be playing this game, I have no issue engaging in discussion and exchange of views with anyone, but I choose not to engage with the possibility of vulgarity, and a totally unbecoming manner of expressing one's views - hence I will not be entertaining you in this thread. Meet you in the horse racing thread

this is part of a letter received by Martin Luther King...before receiving the Nobel Prize

You are a colossal fraud. And an evil vicious one. There is but one way out for you. You had better take it before your filthy abnormal fraudulent self is bared to the nation

I , like many in this forum, probably lack the knowledge of the legitimacy of the challenge to the renewal.
However, all I got from the article , sifting through the verbage and rhetoric regarding transformation, was that it's primarily based on a bloke being pissed off because Gc didn't particularly like him and his assaulting ways . He plays the race card,extending the lack of desire for his participation to all of colour, aided and abetted by the posturing of a political person who uses " funding of retired racehorses", as some kind of evidence of GC's unwillingness to aid transformation.

No substance, only some self interest at play.

Not a very enthralling subject, but my prediction - come the deadline, license renewed and business as usual.