CONFIRMATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS : TRAINER MR A P PETER

Trainer Tony Peter should not be the subject of continuous scrutiny from aggrieved persons via the authorities.
There have been countless positives involving big name trainers and it would probably be a scandal exposing them all.
So it makes no sense why one trainer is getting the Name and Shame tag alone.

Hands off Tony Peter#

.......the problem with too many trainers seems to be that they rely on vets that do not tell the whole truth about their methodology.....heard certain trainer once bleating about a contravention when a substance was still present after 7 days of an intra articular jab because the vet did not hit the sweet spot.....shame....or allowing the same oke to use a schedule 1 Bute to clean a horse up after a viral infection.....:oops:
.....not gunning for anyone in particular and these top guys involved lost big patrons.... and the vet is still very rich and successful....so those that still rely on that type of assistance will still have to pay the big fines.....:whistle:

One thing I know and this is not hearsay. The trainer that has cost me the MOST in trainers bills and the MOST breakdowns and deaths is the trainer with the least success for me. So if the elixir is VETS and bearing in mind we talking about horse racing here where rumour - jealousy and NO ONE KEEPS A SECRET is RIFE!!!!!! I find it astounding that what ever Tony is accused of doing ( apart form being a gifted trainer and horseman) has not been POACHED / COPIED by all and sundry, and perhaps just perhaps been replicated.

Because if a VET is making R1 or R1m off 1 trainer with his "magic" juice why would he not be solicited by all trainers or why would he have the total needle to the other trainers ( I know pun intended) and choose to NOT make profit off all of them........

mikesack wrote:

Trainer Tony Peter should not be the subject of continuous scrutiny from aggrieved persons via the authorities.
There have been countless positives involving big name trainers and it would probably be a scandal exposing them all.
So it makes no sense why one trainer is getting the Name and Shame tag alone.

Hands off Tony Peter#

Gifted trainer with the (mainly) discards of others...has achieved a very high strike...likely due to better feed, training, selection of races to run horses in, etc

I think that Grade 1 win at Graveville recently with a much improved (beat 3 horses rated 14-17 points higher) run brought some scrutiny...I know the horse had only had 3 previous runs and was going over 1600 metres for the first time and was drawn 1 so these all helped with the performance but coupled with improved performances of other horses in the care of the trainer, it raised the question of how from possibly aggrieved other trainers / owners...

I'm of the name and shame all brigade as they distort results thus impacting punters...

......when some trainers thin out their strings and have to release a few with niggles or soundness issues but have genetic potential....the sudden improvement in new environments may at 1st be attributed to a change in feed and different or better training tactics....but what is perplexing is when they continue to improve and event more often as if they never had any issues to start with.....now there are certain other products remedies, equipment and procedure's that can work that are not medical and listed under the prohibited substance guidelines....however these products and procedures take a much longer time to yield results and are not an instant cure as they have to be administered daily and form part of the horses diet as they feed....... so they are not at all induced hypodermically....

Hearing the case will continue in November