Jockeys you wouldnt put your money on.

rob faux Wrote:

---

> Muhti,a strike rate of 30% would require odds of
> 22/10 to break square, after tax.

Thanx Rob....bean counting not my bag....saw/heard it from a degenerate punter with a so called system......what is the average odds of Marcus's high strike rate....:S

The problem I have with this subject is that my stats indicate that stables are a more important factor in horses running to ratings than Jocks.
Some jocks are obviously better than others,and I do favour some, but no matter what jock gets on a unfit, unsound or under nourished horse, it won't perform.
My returns have improved since putting more emphasis on which STABLES,rather than jockeys, I wouldn't put my money on!

rob faux Wrote:

---

> The problem I have with this subject is that my
> stats indicate that stables are a more important
> factor in horses running to ratings than Jocks.
> Some jocks are obviously better than others,and I
> do favour some, but no matter what jock gets on a
> unfit, unsound or under nourished horse, it won't
> perform.
> My returns have improved since putting more
> emphasis on which STABLES,rather than jockeys, I
> wouldn't put my money on!

Too much emphasis placed on the jockeys...They give the horse the edge...they do not carry the horse.(in most instances:D)

Out of form stable...out of form jock...
Sh!t horse...sh!t jock....

Reminds me of a saying...If you put ice-cream on sh!t, it still tastes like sh!t:D

Biggest cerainty that you could only loose is to back Karl Nesius on any horse below 5/1. Above that th horse wins on merit, below that it wins if Karl has some bob onto it or if he knowsanyone hasmoney on it!!

Shittest person nevr mind Jockey by a mile. He will never even piss next to my horse again!!

PTP it's hard to generalise like that about a jock...Karl's last 5 winners have all been under 3/1

follow de kock yard and anton marcus and you have to be in front if you get your combinations right but there is no fool proof theory as we all know because you are taking shorter prices because of them too so as Rob says in a previous post it is all factored in otherwise there would not be any bookmakers would there

The King of Pain for punters,trainer and owners .........Glen HATT.....he pulled us a joseph O brien on Camelot.....tooo much confidence and kak ride......dont deserve to ride that Top Horse again....He cost the best horse the race ....point blank

Zietsman Oosthuizen Wrote:

---

> The King of Pain for punters,trainer and owners
> .........Glen HATT.....he pulled us a joseph O
> brien on Camelot.....tooo much confidence and kak
> ride......dont deserve to ride that Top Horse
> again....He cost the best horse the race ....point
> blank


Rubbish track Ziets

KReddy Wrote:

---

> Rubbish track Ziets


100% correct K...absolutely no room for error..

Titch Wrote:

---

> KReddy Wrote:
>

---

>

---

>
> > Rubbish track Ziets
>
>
> 100% correct K...absolutely no room for error..


agree - as a jock you have to get handy and I think thde boys really earn their fees negotiating that bend

Titch Wrote:

---

> KReddy Wrote:
>

---

>

---

>
> > Rubbish track Ziets
>
>
> 100% correct K...absolutely no room for error..


titch you really are a work of art as under the clairwood thread you totally contradict your above statement regarding these greyhound racetracks compared to courses where the best horse will have every chance to win...like jap im not going to get into an arguement with you as you will undoubtedly twist things

new name "stirrup iron" Neisius