Vaal Sand Thursday

The Madji Wrote:

---

> JustinV Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > i think it would be easier for MS to get to the
> > front in a fillies plate then up against FG and
> > Pylon..??
>
>
> Any lucid explanation for Hunters Valley 61 vs 70
> and a poor draw ? Other than first time on sand
> and raced off turf rating ?


hi madji..badgers quest is a 3yo..so being a 70 minus the WFA of 10 pounds makes BQ a net 60..hunters valley is a 4yo so no WFA over 1800m in feb..so Hunters Valley is a net 61...therefore weighted to beat badgers quest by 1 pound..but i think it was HV first run on sand???? that probably added improvement..but on ratings was supposed to beat BQ

jakes Wrote:

---

> i like...............
>
> ohiki bay
> larussa/boss cat
> solarium/hotal royal
> sparkling sapphire/lady lavan
>
> ......................-D


{snotklap to Jake's head} Where you been? I did not see a leave form...{studiously files Bob's leave form under 'Sick Leave'}

HV is a 3 yr old.

The Madji Wrote:

---

> jakes Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > i like...............
> >
> > ohiki bay
> > larussa/boss cat
> > solarium/hotal royal
> > sparkling sapphire/lady lavan
> >
> > ......................-D
>
>
> {snotklap to Jake's head} Where you been? I did
> not see a leave form...{studiously files Bob's
> leave form under 'Sick Leave'}

meastro in sandals, gooi me a good thing to punt {if that exists at the vaal} my form as k2k as can come.

JustinV Wrote:

---

> The Madji Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > JustinV Wrote:
> >
>

---

>
> >

---

> > > i think it would be easier for MS to get to
> the
> > > front in a fillies plate then up against FG
> and
> > > Pylon..??
> >
> >
> > Any lucid explanation for Hunters Valley 61 vs
> 70
> > and a poor draw ? Other than first time on sand
> > and raced off turf rating ?
>
>
> hi madji..badgers quest is a 3yo..so being a 70
> minus the WFA of 10 pounds makes BQ a net
> 60..hunters valley is a 4yo so no WFA over 1800m
> in feb..so Hunters Valley is a net 61...therefore
> weighted to beat badgers quest by 1 pound..but i
> think it was HV first run on sand???? that
> probably added improvement..but on ratings was
> supposed to beat BQ


My eyes are skew ... saw WFA 3kg's....this bloody sobriety is going to kill me {meandrs off to find a keg of JWB}

Einstein Wrote:

---

> HV is a 3 yr old.


my mistake..dont have a racecard infront of me thought it was 4..in that case must be surface improvement??

The Madji Wrote:

>
>
> Any lucid explanation for Hunters Valley 61 vs 70
> and a poor draw ? Other than first time on sand
> and raced off turf rating ?


They are crap horses who don't run to form.

JustinV Wrote:

---

> Einstein Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > HV is a 3 yr old.
>
>
> my mistake..dont have a racecard infront of me
> thought it was 4..in that case must be surface
> improvement??

HV been on sand twice before.

Rubbish race.Once the fav never ran it's race any piece of @#$% was likely to win.

Rebel Queen wins race 5 and Julie says " a model of consistency ". 01 Jan - 8th, 11 lengths off. 24 Jan - win, 09 Feb - 9th, 22.75 lengths off, 21 Feb - win, today - win. Consistent of late, yes. A model of consistency? Hardly. ...

toothman Wrote:

---

> Rebel Queen wins race 5 and Julie says " a model
> of consistency ". 01 Jan - 8th, 11 lengths off.
> 24 Jan - win, 09 Feb - 9th, 22.75 lengths off, 21
> Feb - win, today - win. Consistent of late, yes.
> A model of consistency? Hardly. ...

Spies gets away with this all the time....(td)

JustinV Wrote:

---

> The Madji Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > JustinV Wrote:
> >
>

---

>
> >

---

> > > i think it would be easier for MS to get to
> the
> > > front in a fillies plate then up against FG
> and
> > > Pylon..??
> >
> >
> > Any lucid explanation for Hunters Valley 61 vs
> 70
> > and a poor draw ? Other than first time on sand
> > and raced off turf rating ?
>
>
> hi madji..badgers quest is a 3yo..so being a 70
> minus the WFA of 10 pounds makes BQ a net
> 60..hunters valley is a 4yo so no WFA over 1800m
> in feb..so Hunters Valley is a net 61...therefore
> weighted to beat badgers quest by 1 pound..but i
> think it was HV first run on sand???? that
> probably added improvement..but on ratings was
> supposed to beat BQ

Comparing sand ratings with turf is pointless...................Hunter Valley's only 2 runs on sand were nowhere near 61 !!!!!

For what it is worth, did a yankee fir the last 4 races:

Laid Back. Boss Cat, Ikati and First Winter. If this happens, the P6 will not be a carryover