do any one now what is the story with tellytrack?

hear is the message for phumelela. you no look after your customer for many year do no blame he bookie for doing your job and take your revenue be cause they do. for me these show tell me nothing new is same old story. why do we see no attempt for get the solution be sides the bashing of the bookie. i say these be fore and i say these again. phumelela are the worse thing for raceing be cause they are arrogant, they dont care of there customer and for sure are no interested in any thing besides the profits. for these gut to cry now the cape is loose money is the joke. the cape was loose money be fore they get involve - WHAT DO THEY DO TO CHANGE WHAT IS HAPPEN BE FORE? these is the company that give the job for family and pals. it apoint the people who are no expert in there field and expect to make money from things be cause the bookies do? i no think these guys have the clue about what happen in the reel world...... the crocodile tears are flowing while the hundreds of millions of rands have been pay to share holders. what the hypocrites. fucking stupid malakkas

Two questions
1) isn't this a monopoly?
2) TT claims they owe intellectual rights to the product, but if it was not for the owner who bring a horse to race they will not have a product to sell, so what about the owners intellectual rights on the horse that is his property, doesn't the owner have any rights?

Is the operator also going to pay 3 % of turnover to the PSL, EPL, La Liga and all the football league fixtures they use for soccer bets, If I was the PSL I would demand my 3% of R5M every week as it is my intellectual property.

Bushmanland Wrote:

---

> Is the operator also going to pay 3 % of turnover
> to the PSL, EPL, La Liga and all the football
> league fixtures they use for soccer bets, If I was
> the PSL I would demand my 3% of R5M every week as
> it is my intellectual property.

every betting shop in the uk pays an anual fee to take soccer bets,or used to

that show was a complete waste of time.anyone with half a brain will know that this decoder business has got nothing to do with extra costs or what bookies contribute to racing or whether tt should make a profit or not or whether wc racing is running at a loss,these are all reasons given by phum when it was originally said it was overseas people wanting more revenue.lol.that clown from cape was being used as a scapegoat talking abt losses and he didnt even know he was only being used,no one mentioned the punters who are getting the raw deal again even tho without the punter there will be no racing because the punter funds the whole game whether by betting with the bookies or the tote.
the bottom line is phum wants the bookies to pay more to running the game so that phum can make more money and pay more money to their shareholders.that is the crux of the matter and anyone or any other reasons given is all a case of smoke and mirrors to fool the punters and lets not forget that if phum carry on with their threat, they will in fact be responsible for losing punters and in the process revenue all because they cant get over the fact they lost their court case against the open bet.
i think the bookies are way to smart for these clowns at phum and the bookies will win this court case as well starting on tues.

Totally agree that Tellytrack is not there to make a profit.It is a promotional and advertising service provided for racing followers to bet and its costs should be in an appropriate PR/Marketing Budget.
Was not totally convinced that the "Chair" was unbiased and no representation from Punters,who are integral to Operators existence .
No Bookmakers representation from either.
I notice that "decoder"was only casually mentioned in Bruss summing up.
The Operators fees increase was coming from a low to a very high base,which naturally was resisted by Bookmakers.There is an obvious requirement for a larger input but this whole scenario could be tied up in court for some time.

I would be very interested in the basis of the bookmakers injunction..................if the operators "own" the broadcast I would have thought that they can supply it to whoever at their own pricing................the buyer obviously has the right to buy or reject!
Lets hope they handle it better than the "open bet" case.

Whilst I agree that Tellytrack is an advertising medium and profit should not be the criteria, surely bookmakers should contribute proportionately to costs , as they benefit similarly.

Did I hear right that the KZN bookmakers except Hollywood have agreed to pay Tellytrack more money.

ManP Wrote:

---

> Did I hear right that the KZN bookmakers except
> Hollywood have agreed to pay Tellytrack more
> money.

Yes

I am going to advise everybody who posts to buy a paperback book called The Goal
Its not about soccer
Trust me all you smart guys will learm something
If you can find it its cheap

A week ago there was a program on BBC E called under cover boss,and it was a company called Paddy Power a betting and gambling site, one of the bosses was taking calls in the call center ,he did every thing to make the customer happy ,even if the customer was wrong,they were so worried not to lose one customer ,they treat the customer so well, but I see in S A we don't care what customers say,the only bookie that has ever given me something is Hollywood on your birthday the send you a gift voucher and wish you,so well done Hollywood ,I only play with them.

Last nights show is on again tonight at 10pm..(according to the newspaper)