Punters losing interest- How can we stop racing from dying?

I would normally play the Vaal card today, but if I cannot atleast get Tellytrack audio I will give it a skip. No point in playing if you have to guess when they are off and phone in. (td)

Dean321 Wrote:

---

> The Madji Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > So in future....why should I pkay horses in
> > isolation when I can spend time with my
> partner,
> > same cost...double enjoyment????
>
> That is an awesome comparison.. Wish i cud try
> with 40 bucks though. LOL.

We played again yesterday morning...cashed R300...played 4 hours and left with R300... was great fun...

What about the payouts are they not to small compared to Lottos Soccer 6 etc. ? The small man needs a dream
and unfortunately they feel jockeys can still determine the outcome?

what happened to that loyalty program Phumelela was going to initiate ??

gregbucks Wrote:

---

> what happened to that loyalty program Phumelela
> was going to initiate ??


They did. Only two or three beneficiaries.....lol...

The Madji Wrote:

---

> gregbucks Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > what happened to that loyalty program Phumelela
> > was going to initiate ??
>
>
> They did. Only two or three
> beneficiaries.....lol...

haha... we obviously not in the mix...()

Can you tell me if it is the size of the pool and jockeys intervention turning people to other interests.

There is a £4M SCOOP SIX IN THE UK ON SATURDAY( R65m)

Edge Wrote:

---

> I dreamt last month that I had invented the
> perfect bet for TAB: a jackpot where only one
> selection per race is allowed, and it must be won,
> so, if no one has all four winners, then it drops
> down to three, then two, then one, and if there
> are still no winners, then it's carried forward,
> as a last resort.
>
> Restricting all tickets to only one selection per
> race levels the playing field, where the big boys,
> with their big perms, are scooping the pools every
> meeting, and the little guy has no chance. The
> cost of a ticket should be exactly R1, no more, no
> less, hang the operator's transaction cost, the
> massive turnover boost, together with the
> increased publicity, will more than compensate.
> The big boys can take multiple tickets if they
> wish, but they will have to take each one as a
> straight line, tough tekkies.
>
> I called it the 'quad', short for quadrangle, and
> it will quickly become a household word. It will
> be on the front page of every newspaper across the
> country every day (quad pool reaches new record
> yesterday; four new lucky millionaires made), and
> the question will be asked everywhere, did you
> quad today? Parents will name their children Quad
> (I think I see your problem, Quad,) doctors will
> use it in their diagnoses (I see you have some
> quad all bunged up in there,) and it can also be
> used as a verb (stop it, or I'll quad you
> alongside the head.) There is no past, present,
> or future tense for quad, it's just quad, and
> that's all there is, was, or ever will be.
>
> Bookies won't touch it with their notorious open
> bet, because the pools will be so massive, and the
> payouts so humungous, that they will be scared to
> death of it, and run for cover behind their soccer
> pools.
>
> To all the readers of this post from big P (you
> know who you are,) use it, don't use it, your
> gain, or loss, whatever.
>
> Fluit, fluit, my storie's uit.


Punters would still play a perm, it would just mean filling out more tickets

@SG, that's what I said!

@Edge...... great post {warm handclap}

introduce another 5 new bets and chase away another 300 punters clever practice - they forget there is only x amount of punting rands