New Computaform

same data
the grid helps me a lot .

the print quality is poor 50 % of the time . It is as if it is off set !

Bob Brogan wrote: Has it got better ? all the complaints seemed to stop?

Bob..Whenever did racing care what it's customers want-the complaints were an immediate reaction and that has worn off.
Punters have learnt to adjust without any compromise from operators......pity that unfortunately the adjustment includes drifts to other forms of punting like sports betting or poker or whatever.
One day racing will realist that when you are no longer the only game in town you need to form a relationship,based on respect,with customers!

I am not a regular buyer of computerform, but I am not too happy with the new format ........ I suppose whenever there is change - you will get likes and dislikes.

Wish they would bring back the first two pages showing the full fields for one's pick 6, jackpot and p.a. and for ease of scratchings.

.....BUMP....exactly a year ago the new Computaform was born....now to revive flagging subscriptions SP GIVE THEM an early Christmas gift.....between a rock and a hard place..... :silly:

.....what are the odds that Computaform increase their subscription prices in the next few weeks.... :oops:

Muhtiman wrote: .....what are the odds that Computaform increase their subscription prices in the next few weeks.... :oops:

I was gong to mention that - but thought I'd rather not give them ideas ....

Elvis, the 'first 2 summary pages' are almost always there , does happen from time to time that they are omitted, but as a rule they are there.............for me (even with the new version) it is still the best value around by far ................ surely beats the newspaper
I would like to see more 'past form' runs - but still a lot of information is given .........how accurate that information is (especially race times in general and '400 to finish' ) is open for debate ....we still need that sectional timing and then the ultimate would be for Computaform to include that information somewhere.....

Frodo wrote:

Muhtiman wrote: .....what are the odds that Computaform increase their subscription prices in the next few weeks.... :oops:

I was gong to mention that - but thought I'd rather not give them ideas ....

Elvis, the 'first 2 summary pages' are almost always there , does happen from time to time that they are omitted, but as a rule they are there.............for me (even with the new version) it is still the best value around by far ................ surely beats the newspaper
I would like to see more 'past form' runs - but still a lot of information is given .........how accurate that information is (especially race times in general and '400 to finish' ) is open for debate ....we still need that sectional timing and then the ultimate would be for Computaform to include that information somewhere.....

Frodo,Elvis's post was in Jan ..................it was our complaints that brought summary pages back!!!!
2 serious shortcomings in Computaform IMO are
a) any times, without the course variant are absolutely useless( would love to have a chat to the genius who decided to exclude them!)
b)a column reflecting the official rating given to each run-IMO one of the most useful tools in analysis.......shouldn't be difficult ..............the NHA are associates!

rob faux wrote:

Frodo wrote:

Muhtiman wrote: .....what are the odds that Computaform increase their subscription prices in the next few weeks.... :oops:

I was gong to mention that - but thought I'd rather not give them ideas ....

Elvis, the 'first 2 summary pages' are almost always there , does happen from time to time that they are omitted, but as a rule they are there.............for me (even with the new version) it is still the best value around by far ................ surely beats the newspaper
I would like to see more 'past form' runs - but still a lot of information is given .........how accurate that information is (especially race times in general and '400 to finish' ) is open for debate ....we still need that sectional timing and then the ultimate would be for Computaform to include that information somewhere.....

Frodo,Elvis's post was in Jan ..................it was our complaints that brought summary pages back!!!!
2 serious shortcomings in Computaform IMO are
a) any times, without the course variant are absolutely useless( would love to have a chat to the genius who decided to exclude them!)
b)a column reflecting the official rating given to each run-IMO one of the most useful tools in analysis.......shouldn't be difficult ..............the NHA are associates!

:blush: got confused with the threads - but Elvis needs constant reminders these days anyway - being a grandpa and all....

Valid suggestions imo - especially the ratings - but being pedantic- I would need to check some anyway - but could definitely save some time

Frodo wrote:

rob faux wrote:

Frodo wrote:

Muhtiman wrote: .....what are the odds that Computaform increase their subscription prices in the next few weeks.... :oops:

I was gong to mention that - but thought I'd rather not give them ideas ....

Elvis, the 'first 2 summary pages' are almost always there , does happen from time to time that they are omitted, but as a rule they are there.............for me (even with the new version) it is still the best value around by far ................ surely beats the newspaper
I would like to see more 'past form' runs - but still a lot of information is given .........how accurate that information is (especially race times in general and '400 to finish' ) is open for debate ....we still need that sectional timing and then the ultimate would be for Computaform to include that information somewhere.....

Frodo,Elvis's post was in Jan ..................it was our complaints that brought summary pages back!!!!
2 serious shortcomings in Computaform IMO are
a) any times, without the course variant are absolutely useless( would love to have a chat to the genius who decided to exclude them!)
b)a column reflecting the official rating given to each run-IMO one of the most useful tools in analysis.......shouldn't be difficult ..............the NHA are associates!

:blush: got confused with the threads - but Elvis needs constant reminders these days anyway - being a grandpa and all....

Valid suggestions imo - especially the ratings - but being pedantic- I would need to check some anyway - but could definitely save some time

I would also check them,as I always do,but I like to know what the consensus is too!........and would highlight consistency &/or "fav" course or distances, at a glance!