Act Of War

  • shrek
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Act Of War

10 years 7 months ago
#532270
Mac wrote:
Bob Brogan wrote: Does no one else not find it bad that anyone that knew anyone knew that Acto Of War would run in the Derby

yet some poor punters were left in the dark?

I know some will say it`s antepost betting there is risk attached and we should have known etc ( Derby was always a sensible option )

Naaaaaah. Act Of War should've gone for the Met. This game is not for sissies. Big, big mistake.

I agree with you Mac, off 53kg's would have been my first choice.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

4 RACING SOCCER R2
  • Frodo
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 13198
  • Thanks: 3103

Re: Act Of War

10 years 7 months ago
#532281
I think maybe if Kingvoldt ran closer in the QP they would have chanced it - as it turns out imo the 3yr colts are slightly over-rated - so the correct decision

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • rob faux
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Act Of War

10 years 7 months ago
#532309
Frodo wrote: I think maybe if Kingvoldt ran closer in the QP they would have chanced it - as it turns out imo the 3yr colts are slightly over-rated - so the correct decision

Agree with you on that !!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • ruffian
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 673
  • Thanks: 31

Re: Act Of War

10 years 7 months ago - 10 years 7 months ago
#532313
Bob Brogan wrote: Does no one else not find it bad that anyone that knew anyone knew that Acto Of War would run in the Derby

yet some poor punters were left in the dark?

I know some will say it`s antepost betting there is risk attached and we should have known etc ( Derby was always a sensible option )

Same old problem. Apparently it would have been too much trouble to announce right after the decision was made.
Full marks to the Snaiths for keeping us apprised of Legislates wellbeing. Its a pity many others don't give a continental about the betting public.
Last edit: 10 years 7 months ago by ruffian.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • TNaicker
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 6803
  • Thanks: 2221

Re: Act Of War

10 years 7 months ago
#532314
rob faux wrote:
Frodo wrote: I think maybe if Kingvoldt ran closer in the QP they would have chanced it - as it turns out imo the 3yr colts are slightly over-rated - so the correct decision

Agree with you on that !!!

And, for what it is worth, I also agree... :)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

HOLLYWOOD 468 NEW
  • Whiteline Fever
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 408
  • Thanks: 39

Re: Re:Act Of War

10 years 7 months ago
#532317
Ertijaal will have his followers. I wouldn't be taking 4/10 on AOW.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Titch
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 9397
  • Thanks: 366

Re: Re:Act Of War

10 years 7 months ago - 10 years 7 months ago
#532322
Whiteline Fever wrote: Ertijaal will have his followers. I wouldn't be taking 4/10 on AOW.
I have a feeling that among his followers will be Act Of War..inside the last 100m :)
Give everything but up!
Last edit: 10 years 7 months ago by Titch.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mr hawaii
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 20086
  • Thanks: 2662

Re: Act Of War

10 years 7 months ago
#532329
TNaicker wrote:
rob faux wrote:
Frodo wrote: I think maybe if Kingvoldt ran closer in the QP they would have chanced it - as it turns out imo the 3yr colts are slightly over-rated - so the correct decision

Agree with you on that !!!

And, for what it is worth, I also agree... :)

and me

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • RobScott
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Act Of War

10 years 6 months ago
#533316
I think it will be interesting to see if act of war stays have a feeling he may be better over 1600 looking forward to the day. :silly:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Tim
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2935
  • Thanks: 324

Re: Act Of War

10 years 6 months ago
#533317
RobScott wrote: I think it will be interesting to see if act of war stays have a feeling he may be better over 1600 looking forward to the day. :silly:

Milers have a good record in the Derby

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

tote tab gold
  • RobScott
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Act Of War

10 years 6 months ago
#533320
True hence the decision, plenty of time with this chap the Dynasties tend to improve with age so no rush to take on the likes of legislate me thinks.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Topic Author
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82713
  • Thanks: 6507

Re: Act Of War

10 years 6 months ago
#533380
RobScott wrote: I think it will be interesting to see if act of war stays have a feeling he may be better over 1600 looking forward to the day. :silly:

The dam has not had any staying winners YET

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.109 seconds

Contact Details

Main Office (HQ)
PO Box 40390
Moreleta Park
Pretoria
0044
+27 (0) 82 785 4357
info@africanbettingclan.com

About A.B.C.

African Betting Clan is established for the upliftment of the sports punter, who enjoys a bet on horse racing, football and other sports, enabling them to voice their views and opinions on all aspects of the sport of their choice, free of charge.

Learn More

T's & C's

The views expressed on this website are not necessarily the views held by the proprietors of the site. Therefore African Betting Clan will not be responsible for any content posted. No persons under the age of 18 years are permitted to gamble. National Responsible Gambling Programme and its toll-free number (0800 006 008)