TRAINER A P PETER RACING STABLES – INVESTIGATION COMPLETED – INQUIRY NOTICE

This has to be the last time a "punter" moans about Tony. Surely as a punter YOU want fancied horses to run well. Saturdays PA paid R4 when last did you see that happening in South Africa.

I have 4 friends that have been punting for over 40 years. These particular people are all un related BUT they have one thing in common. They like taking STRAIGHT LINE PA'S

YES can you believe it, now ask yourself if that strategy works? most people punting under the regime of Phumelela and the current NHRA won't even contemplate a straight line PA. That is because the general consensus is racing is IMPOSSIBLE.....

Now Tony comes along, puts in obscene hours, attention to details, works under the worst conditions ever (watched like a hawk) and still

Provides you (the vocal punter) with your bankers.

The Tote needs turnover, the more people win the better for everyone. The money recycles into the system. When I Pick 6 pays R500k to 1 ticket about R30k makes it back into the system, the rest goes to wife, house, kids etc.....

When fancied horses win and the dividends are low everyone puts back in.

So is TONY PETER BAD for racing and punters YES YES YES 1000000000% because YOU ALL punt with bookmakers on the open bet. and they have to kaaaaaak and betaal.

Ask Hong Kong why Joao Moreira was so huge for them.......he created turnover. Created volume and he rode winners.

Go watch the Bartie Leisher trilogy on You Tube, he rode for the public.

Tony is transparent, his horses go out TRYING.

If he was indeed a cheat, surely surely the once with Witblits would be to win its maiden, then go missing its next 3 starts, GET a price and punt it off the boards.....ooops I can say that about so many of his horses.

As a PUNTER you should be in love with Tony because for you (what you allege you are) trainers and jockeys like Tony provide you with consistent triers that run to form.

Interested to find out if the damages case will go ahead or be delayed until after the findings of the above

....there may be much more damages due to this investigation and the way that the enquiry is to be handled.....regardless of the outcome there is going to be many more legal challenges....the NHRA  have totally botched this by going off half cocked and with irregular procedure....

Simple solutions

1.NHRA Board
Fires Hyde and Moodley and sanction the officials involved on the day. Final written warning
2. Public apology from the Board to the Peter yard
3. Compensation to the affected owners and Jockeys.
4. Define rules more clearly going forward for all yards.

Correct Sly.... rather a pragmatic approach than a long drawn out polarising fight which can only be negative for the industry

 

This board sat and allowed Vee Moodley to rant in the AGM , saying "I am the CEO and can do what I like"  Adv Nigel Riley reminded him that the NHA fell under the laws of the country where by that was his reply. The beginning of the end....

MR Sham

those folk did AMAZING things for SA racing. One of them Asian Ken even managed to pull off a conference in "the fairest cape" I reckon it cost the industry 25 maiden races.....in other words had we not spunked the money on lavish lunches and pretending to be 1st world would could possibly have had a few more aces for our owners....

.....see that some okes at SP are calling for more news on this saga....FFS do they not realize the matter is in the hands of legal eagles and the courts etc which are shut down for the festive period....

From a voyeur 

“What give the NHRA to override a vet? 

 

from a voyeur?

fingers wrote:

from a voyeur?
 

That's what I wrote! A watcher/reader

Hearing the inquiry date has been moved to the Friday before the World Sports Betting MET (26 Jan)