MDK vs Laird

  • Shayne Welman
  • Topic Author
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83414
Both on 70 wins for season. Both around 6 mill from 300 runners.

MDK 36 Wins in Natal
Laird only 3 in Natal

Laird 67 wins JHB
MDK 33 wins in JHB

Western Cape 1 win to MDK none to Laird

Will be great remainder of season.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Andrewest
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83425
Old money vs New money..
I will back the new money...
the old money seems to have gone towards NO MONEY..

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • shikar3
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83491
Just wish Woodruf could have been in the equation.
Hope the stable comes back with some big ones

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • oscar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 4128
  • Thanks: 327

Re: Re: MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83514
Mike de Kock is leagues ahead of anyone else this coutry has or probably will ever see.

The system should , if they wanna compare apples with apples, include overseas earnings as well.

MdK is King.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • zoro
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 1970
  • Thanks: 137

Re: Re: MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83531
Oscar i would be over the moon if i had a horse with Mike,believe me your Havasha,will be bringing you in that magic 6 digit purse in prize money without a doubt.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • oscar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 4128
  • Thanks: 327

Re: Re: MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83536
Tnx Zoro I have over the years owned many horses together with Mike..he is just diffffereent class man.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • russelldavie
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83538
Does anybody know how many horses each of them have in SA? Ill like to think Laird has more.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Andrewest
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83695
Laird is just....
he does not want to go the EPO route..
then he will be steets ahead too..

for those that compare
a body builder with EPO vs a body builder with no juice...
and let the Jockey club just say something..then I will blow the whistle on them..
so let it be..
the old money is broke in any case..

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • oscar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 4128
  • Thanks: 327

Re: Re: MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83734
EPO my arse Andre!

Further note..EPO has zero effect for bodybuilders

I introduced EPO (Eprex) onto the SA mkt in 1991..I shld know something about it mate.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Barry Irwin
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83770
Andrew, stick to something you may possess knowledge of, like computers.

When you venture into other areas, you blow your street cred.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Dave Scott
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 43867
  • Thanks: 3338

Re: Re: MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83789
On the subject of injections, 2 yrs later?

Pletcher fined $25,000 after positive test

USA: Leading trainer Todd Pletcher has been $25,000 and banned for ten days for a positive test on top turf filly Wait A While after she finished third at the Breeders' Cup at Santa Anita in 2008.


The California Horse Racing Board imposed the penalties at a hearing this week to investigate a positive test for the anaesthetic procaine after the Filly & Mare Turf.

According to the Daily Racing Form, procaine is a class 3 medication that is commonly used with penicillin, an antiobiotic, and given to Wait A While under veterinary advice.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Barry Irwin
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: MDK vs Laird

15 years 4 months ago
#83888
The Pletcher fine is pure nonsense.

Here is what I wrote in my blog to my clients:

The Blood-Horse reports that trainer Todd Pletcher has been fined and suspended for 10 days for administering Champion filly Wait a While an antibiotic. Pletcher’s vet told him that it would be safe to give the medication, because he was doing so 18 days from the Breeders’ Cup and the protocol said 14 days would be plenty of time.

Unfortunately, each horse metabolizes medication differently and the trace elements of the drug were still in the mare’s system on Breeders’ Cup day.

Barry Irwin, who has written as much as anybody about horsemen and vets that cheat by using performance enhancing drugs, said “This is a classic case of failing to understand what constitutes somebody that is trying to cheat versus a responsible party that has his horse’s best interests at heart.

“Pletcher was not trying to cheat and he relied upon expert medical advice,” he said. “Compare this with Kiaran McLaughlin’s recent case, in which he was caught administering a respiratory medication closer to some races than was recommended by his vet. Kiaran took a shot and he got caught. This is closer to taking an edge than what Todd did. But compare both of these acts to what guys like Jeff Mullins and Rick Dutrow have done and one can see the difference between those that blatantly take an edge by trying to cheat, versus those that do nothing wrong or take somewhat of a risk.

“For me, it is all about intent. Todd is, in my opinion, 100 percent innocent. Kiaran, on the other hand, is slightly pregnant. Mullins and Dutrow are totally intent on taking an edge. The penalties and fines should be metted out accordingly. Todd now will be looked up as a cheater, which is a bigger criminal offense on the part of the racing officials, than on the supposed perpetrator of the fine.”

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.117 seconds