Neural factor Analysis
- gregbucks
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Neural factor Analysis
14 years 8 months ago
LOL.... I just got in Rob, congrates on the fluke last Friday:D
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Neural factor Analysis
14 years 8 months ago
Can't fault your assessment,Greg...lol
I found that the ratings seem to go like that though,as per my 'consistency' comment.Seem to be very good at times and then sometimes headscratchingly bad.
I found that the ratings seem to go like that though,as per my 'consistency' comment.Seem to be very good at times and then sometimes headscratchingly bad.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mr hawaii
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 20086
- Thanks: 2662
Re: Re: Neural factor Analysis
14 years 8 months ago
sorry greg was out for most of the day so only saw your msg now
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ismikle
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Neural factor Analysis
14 years 8 months ago
Actually my first stab was not so shabby, 4 outright winners out of 7.... might be worth investigating.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mr hawaii
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 20086
- Thanks: 2662
Re: Re: Neural factor Analysis
14 years 8 months ago
ismikle Wrote:
> Actually my first stab was not so shabby, 4
> outright winners out of 7.... might be worth
> investigating.
mike it looks promising - I'm really very busy with other things at the mo or I'd try to give it a go -
> Actually my first stab was not so shabby, 4
> outright winners out of 7.... might be worth
> investigating.
mike it looks promising - I'm really very busy with other things at the mo or I'd try to give it a go -
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Unlucky_Dube
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Neural factor Analysis
14 years 8 months ago
Mac Wrote:
> Howzit UD. I have attached a small excel
> spreadsheet on the Green Point last week. For
> other races you will need to:
> 1. Plug the names of the horses;
> 2. Plug their ratings; and
> 3. Plug the best market prices you can find.
>
> The runners which have perceived value are marked
> "Yes" in the Perceived Value column. You will need
> to prioritise which "Yes" is for you eg you may
> want to choose by:
> 1. the maximum perceived value (eg in the Green
> Point was Fabiani @7%);
> 2. anything you fancy as long it has some
> perceived value; or, what I prefer;
> 3. in descending order of the ratings choose the
> highest rating which has any perceived value,
> again Fabiani is the example.
>
> Unfortunately, Fabiani ran downfield, but for a
> R100 profit, you dont get hurt on a losing stake
> of R5. And if you were are a Pocket Power fan,
> there's no rule which stopped you backing both.
>
> I would like to give this a go for about 10 races
> to see if there would be any positive ROI but I
> understand from Gregbucks that it may be a bit of
> a ball ache to punch in the numbers. I have run
> out of bandwidth so I will need to wait for 1 Dec
> to download Greg's website.
Thanks Mac,
Two thoughts here. ...
I did not see a 6% deduction in your formulae for betting tax, and where do you get the NFA rating or how do you work it out?
> Howzit UD. I have attached a small excel
> spreadsheet on the Green Point last week. For
> other races you will need to:
> 1. Plug the names of the horses;
> 2. Plug their ratings; and
> 3. Plug the best market prices you can find.
>
> The runners which have perceived value are marked
> "Yes" in the Perceived Value column. You will need
> to prioritise which "Yes" is for you eg you may
> want to choose by:
> 1. the maximum perceived value (eg in the Green
> Point was Fabiani @7%);
> 2. anything you fancy as long it has some
> perceived value; or, what I prefer;
> 3. in descending order of the ratings choose the
> highest rating which has any perceived value,
> again Fabiani is the example.
>
> Unfortunately, Fabiani ran downfield, but for a
> R100 profit, you dont get hurt on a losing stake
> of R5. And if you were are a Pocket Power fan,
> there's no rule which stopped you backing both.
>
> I would like to give this a go for about 10 races
> to see if there would be any positive ROI but I
> understand from Gregbucks that it may be a bit of
> a ball ache to punch in the numbers. I have run
> out of bandwidth so I will need to wait for 1 Dec
> to download Greg's website.
Thanks Mac,
Two thoughts here. ...
I did not see a 6% deduction in your formulae for betting tax, and where do you get the NFA rating or how do you work it out?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.100 seconds