trainer forum

mr hawaii Wrote:

---

> i think the horse won because it's owners lived in
> the USA and are wealthy:)o

They were also wealthy residents of the USA when Alibaba's Jewel ran nowhere in their colours on Thursday.

formgrids.biz/subscriber/fgRaceResult.as...VR660,ZA&hs=RED+FORT
on this form I would be worried if I took 16-10 -

magiclips Wrote:

---

> mr hawaii Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > i think the horse won because it's owners lived
> in
> > the USA and are wealthy:)o
>
> They were also wealthy residents of the USA when
> Alibaba's Jewel ran nowhere in their colours on
> Thursday.



Agreed but what you 4got to take into account is that they had more than 1 runner on the day...

some of the posts ravin has made over the past weeks are bladdy ridiculous...cmon guys do yourselfs a favour..he doenst have a clue!!!

easy game this u feed, work them punt them why do u think every trainer has 6 homes and 12 cars and the bookies live in shelters and catch a bus to work

That's the joy of internet forums. The moment you click on the submit button your comments are fair game. < Whether you have the slightest idea of what you're on about, or not.

This has to be a nomination for statement of the century:_

Flash Harry Wrote:

---

> all it show is geff woodruff he dont have an idea
> how good hes horses are.

ALESSANDRIA opened 8/10 started 13/20 WON
SILENT WINGS opened 12/1 started 9/1 (touched 6/1) WON
SHEA SHEA opened 11/10 started 17/20 WON
JET IN THE SKY opened 5/10 started 1/5 WON

All in the last 2 weeks........

Titch, this all falls into the "I've made up my mind, don't confuse me with the facts" category.< As I said before, they can be right ten times and not a word is heard, but let them be even slightly wrong once - World War 3 erupts.

Typical, really.

I concur with everything that Pirates, Magic, Titch and others have said about Jeff and Red Fort.

Red Fort is probably not a star in the stable. It was a weak field. Trainer did not think it was a 9/10 shot though and nothing wrong with that.

Racing is not for the feint hearted. Get real.

Is it not also possible that Red Fort is something of a staying type whose fast work over shorter distances doesn't amount to a whole lot?

The ironic thing is that this very thread was started asking why trainers don't help the punter by creating a forum where they could give opinions/thoughts regarding their runners......the term asked and answered springs to mind.

agra Wrote:

---

> I concur with everything that Pirates, Magic,
> Titch and others have said about Jeff and Red
> Fort.
>
> Red Fort is probably not a star in the stable. It
> was a weak field. Trainer did not think it was a
> 9/10 shot though and nothing wrong with that.
>
> Racing is not for the feint hearted. Get real.


agra,titch,..i ask u...whats the point of hearing post race interviews... for me..its to get some kind of insight to the chances of horses the trainer or jock has for future events or races sometimes on that particular meeting or maybe even for other races that is mapped out for that horses career.....now i am not gonna take all the other winners woody had or the comments of all his other horses that did not show....but i am gonna take the instance of RED FORT....U BOTH KNOW what i knew about red fort and u both know from where it came....how can woody justify those comments on national tv...he knew the strength of the field...i think it was totally misleading....and just a point further had i not known about red fort like the the way i knew about it yesterday...i would have been put off by woodys comments....the point here is...he knew that this horse had a fair chance of winning...i guarantee u...he knew...he had no right to be that negative on this horse....and if woody denies this....then maybe Ravin is right...he doesn't know his horse...but i doubt that....