pick 6 PE - Disaster

It would be better for the stakes if we didnt punt with a company that thinks of dividends before everything else

Titch Wrote:

---

> There was really only 1 leg that would have been
> helped by the old coupling rule (7th race) 1st
> leg,winner not coupled 2nd leg, coupled but the
> winner was ridden by stable jock and was the
> shortest priced runner from the yard,3rd leg
> ,winner not coupled, 4th Leg Smash result, 5th
> Leg, winner not coupled and 6th Leg, winner not
> coupled so surely 1 leg out of the 6 cannot make
> the difference of having a winner and a complete
> carry over??


I agree

100 percent hibs

soodum Wrote:

---

> Rob when I check you @ dereks place you must share
> the graft,I ll get eric to pour you a dop
>
>


Soodum I am there this weekend.

I will buy him a round as well. Just don't know who he is.
Will check with Derek or Eric

boys where are the experts vee say he speak to today? i dont agree with rob scott the p6 will soon be come smaller than jack pot. rob scott 99% of people do not have the inside info like you in your brother stable so they play a few time then they learn lesson. the mega pot you talk about is build entirely by loosers. these loosers they will not donate for ever. is my view point.

Flash Harry Wrote:

---

> boys where are the experts vee say he speak to
> today?

Certainly didn't ask me FH < lmao

i think all the experts are phumelela employee <

Titch Wrote:

---

> There was really only 1 leg that would have been
> helped by the old coupling rule (7th race) 1st
> leg,winner not coupled 2nd leg, coupled but the
> winner was ridden by stable jock and was the
> shortest priced runner from the yard,3rd leg
> ,winner not coupled, 4th Leg Smash result, 5th
> Leg, winner not coupled and 6th Leg, winner not
> coupled so surely 1 leg out of the 6 cannot make
> the difference of having a winner and a complete
> carry over??


titch it makes a huge difference to the way you structure yr bets in that where you could go thin in one or 2 legs because of cplings and maybe put field in others now you have to put all the or some of the stables horses that have a realistic winning chance...

My issue is that Vee and Robert and John and everyone else want to rape the punter! WTF the cake is only one size! The punter only gets tothe tote or wherever to spend what he has in his pocket !!! Give him 1 bet or 10 bets he can only still spend what he has ! But OH sorry Comingling !!! What a bunch of clowns ! Casinos make you look damn stupid ! So carry on ! Bunch of clowns . Whatch the pools all get divided ! The arrogant Vee has all the answers . Que Sera Sera what ever will be will VEE.

There is an obvious pattern........everybody with an ear close to the ground approves as they have an advantage(some more than others) ........those that have to guess tend to oppose the move!

The 2 concerms I have is:
1)The reason given is that racing needs a dream bet,and then they split the carryover.............are they for real?

2) a dream bet for racing is a great idea ,but it needs to be advertised outside Tellytrack and Racing publications otherwise they are preaching to the converted.

Another thing that needs to be considered is that the LOWER RETURN TO MORE PUNTERS bets keep getting recycled, so every time they pay a rand, and it gets recycled, they get 25% again.
I got a fright when I realised how much I was running through the tote and contributing to the take-out each month and I am not a big punter!. I wouldn't do it if I wasn't recycling returns and obviously I don't use the tote for win or place bets.

Surely they do not tax the carryover portion of a P6 pool?

Also - what is the current tax % on the P6 ?

Hi Clan

I would just like to know - Why don't they keep the carryover pools at the centre where it was carried forward. Look its not gonna be easy to catch these P6's, so why not give the "locals" @ that specific centre a bigger carrot to play for??? Let's be honest what is the chances of a JHB Pick 6 getting carried over to a PE pool? I'd say to be fair, it should just get rolled over to the next SA meeting, this will give everyone a chance to end up with a "lottery" pool. Would like to read your thoughts on this. Thanks guys.