pick 6 PE - Disaster

Sham Racing Wrote:

---

> Ben hur don't know who you are , but @#$%& like
> you mess the game up for others
> With transparency we are only trying to put out
> there what we see at work ,amazing when it goes
> right then all is well
> What have you done for the game??
> Apart from telling every one that you cleaned up
> wogsy ,the horse went from 12/1 to 33/1 so "show
> me the money" eg ticket
> Remember horses do make fools of trainers
> Honesty is our policy
> Ask Dave Scot what was discussed with him about
> Miss Diana and Bud at the races yesterday
> Don't hide behind a Pseudonym. If people only did
> things for themselves the game will go nowhere.put
> something back that isn't always negative
> Mark Sham


Mark you don't know what you are talking about

Ben-Hur Wrote:

---

> what I can't understand is the coincidence.
> Many clanners spoke highly of PE racing and the
> fact that value was had and that racing there
> attracted big fields and that certain trainers
> unlike at other centres were transparent.
> Is that all out the window now.Is that center not
> ok now.
> The first meeting with the new rules and boom boom
> boom form out the window
>
> Also I want to say horseshiet to those that make
> some trainers more transparent just because
> information is offered.It will take decades of
> practicing before you can understand trainers
> speak.Do me a favour and tell me of a trainer that
> is transparent.They always have two sets of
> statements -one for me and one fir u.Fark me I
> might be the village idiot but you not going to
> pull the wool over my eyes.
> There is no trainer worth anything that cannot
> tell the type of race his or her horse is gonna
> run.
> cliche but please remove your blinkers some of
> you
> For the best part you stand alone The Poor Punter
> nothing more nithing less.
> To any trainer that says um wrong I will say you
> don't know how to train horses

The trainer only can tell how his horses are doing and not the others in the race. I would ask you why would a trainer tell you his horses have big chances when they don't? What would any trainer have to gain from this by telling you on an open forum? Amazing when the trainer you are obliviously referring to has given many winners on this site and a PA or two - What are they doing it for? To be transparent and to assist the punter is the only conclusion I can come to - To the Shams and other trainers like LG, Lowan D, Craig etc you have the correct approach and a poor loser is part and parcel of this game and for those that have that trait I apologize.

Mark we have always had people Make snide remarks towards our higher profile posters , something that I have never understood..
Keep up the great effort you guys put into racing , without you guys PE would be 200% poorer

Bob

Craig Eudey Wrote:

---

> Mark is 100% right. We(most trainers) try and help
> the punter. We will never get it right every time
> but I for 1 do not lie to people!


Why wait for Mark first Craig

ben hur if trainers dont know what they talking abt regarding their horses then dont read their comments but dont fcuk it up for the majority of punters who appreciate them coming forward with their thoughts on their runners...

BH I am not sure what you mean?:S

pirates Wrote:

---

> ben hur if trainers dont know what they talking
> abt regarding their horses then dont read their
> comments but dont fcuk it up for the majority of
> punters who appreciate them coming forward with
> their thoughts on their runners...


Maybe they should have coordinates on the page for easier reference

Ben Hur your post actually sickens me,you are completely offside and obviously talking from your pocket...just to clarify my thinking do you honestly believe that trainers who have their own websites and offer their OPINIONS free of charge went through the time effort and expense so that they could offer up disinformation :S or that those who post here have a hidden agenda?? If so then your statements/posts cant be taken seriously by anyone that has even a vague idea of racing, the fact that the entire pool was carried over is indicative to the fact that the results caught all and sundry by surprise and here's a news flash it has happened many times before and is guaranteed to happen again, something that anyone with 1/2 a brain can see,crying foul and pointing fingers every time there are bad results imo is ridiculous and in poor taste but for you to have the gaul to post your thinly disguised accusation which is clearly aimed at those who take the time to post their thoughts about their runners here is not only disgusting but probably libel, wake up and smell the roses or move on, you and your ridiculous conspiracy theories wont be missed.

We need a cyber breathalyser

hibernia Wrote:

---

> We need a cyber breathalyser


LMAO...

Well I for one will be moving some money from bookie account to tote account for my p6's. No limits on a big pool is an attraction. So from that point of view Phum may achieve some growth in tote turnover.

Some of the MISLEADING info trainers gave Trevor Reid at Phumelela

---

> TABONLINE-
>
> With the new coupling rule in the Pick 6 taking
> effect at Arlington today, I spoke to some of the
> trainers about what punters can expect when they
> have more than one runner in a race.
> Justin Snaith: Jockey Richard Fourie is our stable
> rider, so his runners are all preferred. Of the
> couplings, Ivor’s Victory (Race 6) and Misty Day
> (Race 7) are the stable’s picks.
> Gavin Smith: Silverano is preferred to
> Victorialaine and Jervis in Race 5. Even if
> reserve runner Waging War gets to run in Race 6,
> Sidestep is the right one. Secret Choice is
> preferred to Varuna in Race 7, while Zezihno
> Campeao and Victor Sylvester are the stable elects
> in Races 8 and 9. For the record, we expect a big
> run from Pricy Asset in Race 2 because the shorter
> trip will suit her.
> Grant Paddock: My best runner of the day is Dark
> Knight in Race 8, while I prefer the chances of
> Red Silvano to White House in Race 5.
> Alan Greeff: My best three chances in the Pick 6
> lie with Drumminor (Race 5), Classic Victory (Race
> 7) and Diamond Emblem (Race 9). Nobody should
> leave Placido out in the fifth leg of Pick 6
> perms.
> Jacques Strydom: I would have made Giaduja a
> banker if he was not drawn widest of all. We are
> trying to qualify him for the Algoa Cup (Grade 3).
> Key Castle is our best of the yard’s runners in
> Race 5. I like both Fiery and Romanella in Race 7.
> Surfer Buzz gets the vote in Race 9 but I would
> suggest also including Leo Rapax and Kelly’s
> Heir because either could surprise.
> Dorrie Sham: Miss Diana is having her first run
> for us and is working well so is preferred to
> House Of Wax in Race 9.

I