Thank you South Africa

  • gg
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 410
  • Thanks: 8

Re: Re: Thank you South Africa

11 years 6 months ago
#420861
mikesack Wrote:
> Did the robber have a gun? Hope he gets his just
> desserts!!
>
> A would be trio of robbers were stopped in their
> tracks in the process of a robbery when police
> responded to a call from the owner and the one
> chap in his desperation to flee jumped down a
> sheer cliff and managed to cling on to something,
> however not for long.
>
> When the police divers recovered the body from the
> river, a TOY GUN was found in the pocket.However
> the intention was there to commit a robbery so
> expect no sympathy.

Yes , He had a 9mm and shot , Ian Fellows (71 ) three times . He had passed away by the time the neighbours arrived.

The police have recovered the 9mm used plus the stolen guns.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Titch
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 9397
  • Thanks: 366

Re: Re: Thank you South Africa

11 years 6 months ago
#421427
Mail and Guardian

President Jacob Zuma has derived "substantial" personal benefit from works that exceeded security needs at his Nkandla homestead and must repay the state, public protector Thuli Madonsela has provisionally found.

Cabinet members have justified the tax millions splurged on Nkandla, saying it was essential in providing Zuma with appropriate security.

But a swimming pool, visitors' centre, amphitheatre, cattle kraal, marquee area, extensive paving and new houses for relocated relatives were all improperly included in the security upgrade at "enormous cost" to the taxpayer, Madonsela found.

AmaBhungane calculates that cost at nearly R20-million.

And, what may be Zuma's greatest embarrassment since taking office, Madonsela's provisional report recommends that Parliament must call him to account for violating the executive ethics code on two counts: failing to protect state resources, and misleading Parliament for suggesting he and his family had paid for all structures unrelated to security.

Zuma told Parliament last November: "All the buildings and every room we use in that residence was built by ourselves as family and not by government."

Madonsela's report is provisional as she has yet to give the interested and affected parties, including Zuma, a chance to comment, which may affect her findings. Its working title is Opulence on a Grand Scale – apparently from a complaint made by a member of the public. Her findings include that the upgrade constitutes exactly that.

The release of the report has been delayed by the security cluster and public works ministers' attempt earlier this month to interdict her from releasing it pending the resolution of their "security" concerns. This has raised fears that Madonsela may be prevented from reporting her full findings.

AmaBhungane has learnt key features of the report from sources with direct access to it but who cannot be named due to sensitivity over leaks. Her findings are corroborated by over 12 000 pages of evidence amaBhungane obtained through access-to-information litigation from the department of public works, which implemented the upgrade.

Key allegations in the report include:

Costs escalated from an initial R27-million to R215-million, with a further R31-million in works outstanding;
There was "uncontrolled creep" of the project's scope after Zuma's private architect, at Zuma's behest, assumed a second hat as the public works department's "principal agent". This meant he was conflicted, serving two masters with divergent needs;
Another four firms that Zuma had privately engaged for his own work were taken on by the department without following tender procedures.
AmaBhungane estimates that the Zuma appointees were paid more than R90-million by the state;
There were unsuccessful attempts by the department to apportion non-security costs to Zuma. Madonsela could not determine whether a document apportioning the costs reached Zuma;
The Nkandla upgrade was "acutely" more expensive than public works expenditure at previous presidents' private homes, by far the most expensive of which was Nelson Mandela's at R32-million (see graphic); and
Even genuine security measures, such as 20 houses for police protectors, a clinic and two helipads were excessive and could have been placed at the nearby town to benefit the broader community.
Give everything but up!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • davetheflower
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11060
  • Thanks: 534

Re: Re: Thank you South Africa

11 years 6 months ago
#421429
Chalk and Cheese...

Montevideo – José Mujica, president of Uruguay, has been described as the world’s poorest and most generous political leader; he donates about 90% of his salary to charities, lives in a modest house at his wife’s flower farm, and drives a 1987 VW Beetle.

José Mujica, 77, is an atypical politician. Uruguayans know him as “Pepe” and just about everyone in the country agrees that, in everyday life, he’s a citizen like any other, except he doesn’t have a bank account and has very few debts. He lists an old VW Beetle as his only personal asset, although he also gets to use, as official transport vehicle, a humble Chevrolet Corsa which he calls “the Presidential car”.

By law, Mujica’s annual salary is about US$ 150,000. Pepe keeps 10% of it for personal expenses and transfers the rest to a Foundation administered by the Movement of Popular Participation, his political left-wing organization, which supports small productive enterprises and NGOs working on housing developments for the poor. That leaves Mujica about US$ 1,250 a month.

“I do fine with that amount; I have to do fine because there are many Uruguayans who live with much less,”
said Mujica in an interview with El Mundo

Lowest paid politician
How does Mujica’s salary compare with earnings of other political leaders? Assuming that most of the highest-paid political leaders do not give away an important fraction of their salary, and just to mention a few comparative examples, Mujica’s annual take-home pay (US$15,000) is 5.8 percent of David Cameron’s (UK) annual income; 4.2 percent of Stephen Harper’s (Canada); 3.1 percent of B. Obama’s yearly income (USA); 2.9 percent of Kenya’s Raila Odinga; just 2.5 percent of what Julia Gillard of Australia earns, and only 0.7% of the income amassed by Lee Hsien Loong of Singapore.

An example of austerity and solidarity
At a time when many world leaders request or impose austerity on their country’s citizens, Mujica himself maintains a very simple and austere lifestyle. He doesn’t live in the Palace of Suarez y Reyes, the official presidential residence. Instead, he lives in a farmhouse in Rincón del Cerro, a locality in the outskirts of Montevideo, the Uruguayan capital.

The farm and the house are the property of his wife Lucía Topolansky, whom Pepe married in 2005 after many years of co-habitation. At Lucía’s farm, the couple operates a vegetable and flower growing business.

During the coldest days of the winter of 2012 (Southern Hemisphere), Mujica offered the use of the presidential residence, normally used for government meetings, to serve as shelter for homeless families. The Ministry of Social Development (MIDES) managed to find suitable alternatives, and the Presidential Palace was not used, but it remains as an option in case of emergencies.

Most recently, José Mujica took part in a meeting of CEFIR (Training Center for Regional Integration) where he attended a lecture on “Challenges for Mercosur” (the Southern Common Market). He had a bruised nose. When asked about the cause of his injury, he confessed it happened while helping a neighbour to repair a metal roof after a severe wind storm that recently hit Southern Brazil, Uruguay and Northern Argentina.

The former guerrilla fighter
Jose Mujica was a leader of the Uruguayan guerrilla group known as the National Liberation Movement – Tupamaros (MLN). Between 1960 and 1972, the Tupamaros clashed with the Conservative government of Uruguay, but were defeated in 1972. Most Tupamaro leaders, including José Mujica, were jailed and remained in captivity during the military dictatorship that ruled the country between 1973 and 1985.

Mujica spent almost 14 years in a military prison. In 1985, at the end of the military regime, he was released under an amnesty law covering political and related crimes committed since 1962. In 1994, Mujica was elected deputy, and in 1999 and 2004 he was elected senator. On March, 2005 Mujica was appointed by the then President Tabaré Vázquez as Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries, a position he held until March, 2008, when he returned to the Uruguayan legislature as senator. In November 2009, he was elected President of the Republic for the period 2010-2015.

In June 13 to 22, 2012, president Mujica attended Rio+20, the 20-year follow-up to the 1992 Earth Summit / United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro under the name “The Future we want”. At this meeting, Pepe gave a simple, eloquent, and moving speech on “Human Happiness and the Environment”, which was deemed as probably one of the best speeches of the conference. The video below shows the speech in Spanish with English subtitles, but here is a better translation of Mujica’s words.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • gregbucks
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: Thank you South Africa

11 years 2 months ago
#459957
Thuli Madonsela has just said on Redi Tlhabi's show: "Zuma may not have read menu but when food is delivered he should have asked what's in the food, is it affordable?"


What an embarrassment this ANC and Number 1 is to South Africa...:(

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.119 seconds

Contact Details

Main Office (HQ)
PO Box 40390
Moreleta Park
Pretoria
0044
+27 (0) 82 785 4357
info@africanbettingclan.com

About A.B.C.

African Betting Clan is established for the upliftment of the sports punter, who enjoys a bet on horse racing, football and other sports, enabling them to voice their views and opinions on all aspects of the sport of their choice, free of charge.

Learn More

T's & C's

The views expressed on this website are not necessarily the views held by the proprietors of the site. Therefore African Betting Clan will not be responsible for any content posted. No persons under the age of 18 years are permitted to gamble. National Responsible Gambling Programme and its toll-free number (0800 006 008)