What is happening with Clairwood Racetrack?
- oscar
-
Topic Author
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4128
- Thanks: 327
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82475
- Thanks: 6449
Re: What is happening with Clairwood Racetrack?
10 years 3 months ago
What you heard my pal?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: What is happening with Clairwood Racetrack?
10 years 3 months ago
The proposed R2 billion logistics park at Clairwood racecourse in Durban has been rejected by the provincial department of environmental affairs following “critical concerns” by several departments in the eThekwini municipality.
The racecourse was sold by the Gold Circle group nearly two years ago for R430 million to Capital Property Fund, which plans to turn the site into a logistics and distribution park for goods and shipping containers.
However, eThekwini raised concerns about the negative environmental impacts to one of the last major wetland areas south of the city, as well as increased traffic congestion from heavy trucks transporting goods.
In a letter sent to the environmental consultants for the logistics park last month, the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Environmental Affairs said eThekwini officials had raised “critical issues and concerns” which had not been addressed sufficiently. They had, therefore, decided to reject the environmental impact report for the project.
It was willing to reconsider its rejection if Capital Property could reach agreements that addressed the concerns.
One concern was that Capital Property and its environmental consultants had not gone far enough to mitigate the damage to one of the last wetland areas in south Durban and appeared to have “largely ignored” the expert advice of specialist reports.
According to the draft environmental impact report last year, Capital Projects proposed setting aside about 10 percent of the site as a “conservation area” and to relocate a number of critically endangered plants such as the Race Course Lily, which is found only at the course.
The department complained that the consultancy, Kerry Seppings Environmental Management Specialists, seemed to place economic development above the environmental costs of the proposal.
The environmental planning department acknowledged the need for a new logistics and distribution park and that it would contribute significantly to the local economy.
“However, the need for economic development needs to be balanced with the equally important need to sustain the natural resource base on which the municipality’s economic growth depends.”
The department’s concerns were compounded by likely loss of other large areas of open space and valuable ecological habitat at the old Durban International Airport and the proposed Dig-Out Harbour.
During the environmental rating process, a specialist report appeared to have given unacceptably low scores to the value of the Clairwood land for birds, amphibians and other fauna and flora.
The proposed 7.4ha “conservation area” in the northern section of the 76ha racecourse site was not adequate to mitigate against ecological damage. The main feature of the small conservation area was a large artificial pond whose purpose appeared to be “a ready-made stormwater attenuation pond”.
“The apparent mitigation and offset proposals presented do not come close to adequately addressing the impacts to wetland habitat that will occur should development be approved,” the department said.
In its response, the Kerry Seppings consultancy disagreed with suggestions that environment rating scores were too low, or that there was an attempt to place economic development imperatives above the environment. It said the layout of the conservation area had been amended slightly to reduce the size of the water pond to allow for more grassland area.
The eThekwini Transport Authority has also raised separate concerns about the likely traffic congestion impacts cause by heavy container trucks. In its objections, the authority did not go into detail, simply recording that a traffic impact assessment done by Aurecon South Africa was “not acceptable”.
“The areas of concern have been communicated to the applicant’s traffic engineer.”
Kerry Seppings said the project’s traffic engineer had held meetings with eThekwini Transport Authority to address concerns and did not anticipate “any major showstoppers”.
The eThekwini electricity department said the logistics park would require a major new substation and Capital Property would be liable for these costs. In its response, Kerry Seppings said one was not needed immediately, but would be in the future.
The municipality’s fire safety department said it was worried about the proximity of the development to a Transnet underground fuel pipeline as well as a Sasol gasline. The Major Hazard Installation risk assessment would be incomplete or inaccurate unless these risks were assessed.
Responding, Kerry Seppings said the risks to the Transnet pipeline had been included in the risk assessment, while the Sasol gas pipeline risks would be incorporated in the revised assessment.
Capital Property Fund spokesman Nico Prinsloo did not respond to requests for comment. - The Mercury
The racecourse was sold by the Gold Circle group nearly two years ago for R430 million to Capital Property Fund, which plans to turn the site into a logistics and distribution park for goods and shipping containers.
However, eThekwini raised concerns about the negative environmental impacts to one of the last major wetland areas south of the city, as well as increased traffic congestion from heavy trucks transporting goods.
In a letter sent to the environmental consultants for the logistics park last month, the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Environmental Affairs said eThekwini officials had raised “critical issues and concerns” which had not been addressed sufficiently. They had, therefore, decided to reject the environmental impact report for the project.
It was willing to reconsider its rejection if Capital Property could reach agreements that addressed the concerns.
One concern was that Capital Property and its environmental consultants had not gone far enough to mitigate the damage to one of the last wetland areas in south Durban and appeared to have “largely ignored” the expert advice of specialist reports.
According to the draft environmental impact report last year, Capital Projects proposed setting aside about 10 percent of the site as a “conservation area” and to relocate a number of critically endangered plants such as the Race Course Lily, which is found only at the course.
The department complained that the consultancy, Kerry Seppings Environmental Management Specialists, seemed to place economic development above the environmental costs of the proposal.
The environmental planning department acknowledged the need for a new logistics and distribution park and that it would contribute significantly to the local economy.
“However, the need for economic development needs to be balanced with the equally important need to sustain the natural resource base on which the municipality’s economic growth depends.”
The department’s concerns were compounded by likely loss of other large areas of open space and valuable ecological habitat at the old Durban International Airport and the proposed Dig-Out Harbour.
During the environmental rating process, a specialist report appeared to have given unacceptably low scores to the value of the Clairwood land for birds, amphibians and other fauna and flora.
The proposed 7.4ha “conservation area” in the northern section of the 76ha racecourse site was not adequate to mitigate against ecological damage. The main feature of the small conservation area was a large artificial pond whose purpose appeared to be “a ready-made stormwater attenuation pond”.
“The apparent mitigation and offset proposals presented do not come close to adequately addressing the impacts to wetland habitat that will occur should development be approved,” the department said.
In its response, the Kerry Seppings consultancy disagreed with suggestions that environment rating scores were too low, or that there was an attempt to place economic development imperatives above the environment. It said the layout of the conservation area had been amended slightly to reduce the size of the water pond to allow for more grassland area.
The eThekwini Transport Authority has also raised separate concerns about the likely traffic congestion impacts cause by heavy container trucks. In its objections, the authority did not go into detail, simply recording that a traffic impact assessment done by Aurecon South Africa was “not acceptable”.
“The areas of concern have been communicated to the applicant’s traffic engineer.”
Kerry Seppings said the project’s traffic engineer had held meetings with eThekwini Transport Authority to address concerns and did not anticipate “any major showstoppers”.
The eThekwini electricity department said the logistics park would require a major new substation and Capital Property would be liable for these costs. In its response, Kerry Seppings said one was not needed immediately, but would be in the future.
The municipality’s fire safety department said it was worried about the proximity of the development to a Transnet underground fuel pipeline as well as a Sasol gasline. The Major Hazard Installation risk assessment would be incomplete or inaccurate unless these risks were assessed.
Responding, Kerry Seppings said the risks to the Transnet pipeline had been included in the risk assessment, while the Sasol gas pipeline risks would be incorporated in the revised assessment.
Capital Property Fund spokesman Nico Prinsloo did not respond to requests for comment. - The Mercury
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PeeKay
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 7885
- Thanks: 223
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- oscar
-
Topic Author
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4128
- Thanks: 327
Re: What is happening with Clairwood Racetrack?
10 years 3 months ago
Or keeping it as a racecourse??
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: What is happening with Clairwood Racetrack?
10 years 3 months agoThat option is starting to shorten dramatically in the betting!!!oscar wrote: Or keeping it as a racecourse??
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82475
- Thanks: 6449
Re: What is happening with Clairwood Racetrack?
10 years 3 months agoTitch wrote:That option is starting to shorten dramatically in the betting!!!oscar wrote: Or keeping it as a racecourse??
there is phindi`s chance, wheres her ambition now?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Deeno
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8174
- Thanks: 483
Re: What is happening with Clairwood Racetrack?
10 years 3 months ago
it is unkept at the moment with the grass about a meter high.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Chris van Buuren
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9804
- Thanks: 202
Re: What is happening with Clairwood Racetrack?
10 years 3 months ago
What would GC do, lease it from the buyers?
Would this open up for a private group to run the course?
I don't know.....GC or any other operator doesn't like to be wrong or made fools of.....
Would this open up for a private group to run the course?
I don't know.....GC or any other operator doesn't like to be wrong or made fools of.....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: What is happening with Clairwood Racetrack?
10 years 2 months ago - 10 years 2 months agoChris van Buuren wrote: What would GC do, lease it from the buyers?
Would this open up for a private group to run the course?
I don't know.....GC or any other operator doesn't like to be wrong or made fools of.....
....................too late................lol

Jokes aside ,I would hope that if they could buy back Clairwood at a huge discount (based on fit for purpose value) that they would do so.
As I have said often ,I think that each province should have a Polytrack due to ever changing weather patterns,but I think squeezing in 2 tracks at Greyville is a complete DISASTER ,but that will never be conceded by the present encumbents,........however I believe the polytrack needs ,and will have, a new home when the time comes for a complete resurface!
Last edit: 10 years 2 months ago by rob faux.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Over the Air
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2948
- Thanks: 721
Re: What is happening with Clairwood Racetrack?
10 years 2 months ago
You can forget Clairwood ever being utilised as a racetrack again. Gold Circle have long spent the cash and they will never admit that it was one of the biggest fuckups made. A similar situation occured with Newmarket if I recall correctly. Palms were already greased and the rest is history as they say
The following user(s) said Thank You: Setaromedia
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: What is happening with Clairwood Racetrack?
10 years 2 months agoOver the Air wrote: You can forget Clairwood ever being utilised as a racetrack again. Gold Circle have long spent the cash and they will never admit that it was one of the biggest fuckups made. A similar situation occured with Newmarket if I recall correctly. Palms were already greased and the rest is history as they say
OTA watch this space

Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.116 seconds