Steinhoff leaks
- Sylvester
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 13980
- Thanks: 1419
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months ago
Steinhoff's former CEO Markus Jooste could be giving testimony about what transpired at the global furniture retailer in a week's time, after Speaker of the National Assembly Baleka Mbete on Tuesday evening authorised Parliament's oversight committee on finance to summons him and the group's former CFO Ben la Grange.
The hearing is scheduled to take place on Wednesday 29 August.
"[The] National Assembly and its committees are empowered to summon not only state organs to account to Parliament, but any private person, institution or regulatory body to provide evidence on any legitimate matter of public interest which falls within the scope of their oversight mandate," said Parliament in a media release on Tuesday afternoon.
It noted that people would be "compelled to comply with the directives of the committee".
Jooste abruptly resigned from Steinhoff in early December 2017 amid a still-ongoing accounting scandal. The Stellenbosch-headquartered group's share price has plunged by over 95% since he stepped down.
He has not spoken to the media since quitting the company. He is also being investigated by priority crime investigating unit the Hawks, and may be the subject of a separate German police investigation.
Parliament said in its statement that the Standing Committee on Finance wants to hear from the two former senior executives about "institutional flaws and challenges existing in [SA's] financial regulatory framework" and other reasons which may have caused the "Steinhoff debacle".
"Therefore, the inquiry is not a criminal investigation establishing criminal liability, nor is it a civil inquiry establishing civil liability of Steinhoff or its employees,' it said.
Earlier Bloomberg reported that Steinhoff had suspended La Grange, together with and ex-director Stehan Grobler.
While both La Grange and Grobler stepped down from their roles earlier this year, they remained on short-term consultancy deals, Steinhoff said in an emailed response to Bloomberg questions on Tuesday.
The hearing is scheduled to take place on Wednesday 29 August.
"[The] National Assembly and its committees are empowered to summon not only state organs to account to Parliament, but any private person, institution or regulatory body to provide evidence on any legitimate matter of public interest which falls within the scope of their oversight mandate," said Parliament in a media release on Tuesday afternoon.
It noted that people would be "compelled to comply with the directives of the committee".
Jooste abruptly resigned from Steinhoff in early December 2017 amid a still-ongoing accounting scandal. The Stellenbosch-headquartered group's share price has plunged by over 95% since he stepped down.
He has not spoken to the media since quitting the company. He is also being investigated by priority crime investigating unit the Hawks, and may be the subject of a separate German police investigation.
Parliament said in its statement that the Standing Committee on Finance wants to hear from the two former senior executives about "institutional flaws and challenges existing in [SA's] financial regulatory framework" and other reasons which may have caused the "Steinhoff debacle".
"Therefore, the inquiry is not a criminal investigation establishing criminal liability, nor is it a civil inquiry establishing civil liability of Steinhoff or its employees,' it said.
Earlier Bloomberg reported that Steinhoff had suspended La Grange, together with and ex-director Stehan Grobler.
While both La Grange and Grobler stepped down from their roles earlier this year, they remained on short-term consultancy deals, Steinhoff said in an emailed response to Bloomberg questions on Tuesday.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- naresh
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6386
- Thanks: 1497
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months ago
www.iol.co.za/business-report/opinion/op...ame-changer-16647517
CAPE TOWN - JP Landman, a political and economic analyst, says that if you have good contacts, you have a greater chance of achieving success in South Africa. Landman refers to this as social capital. James-Brent Styan, by now the well-known author of the Steinhoff book, explains that social capital is just the relationship, the trust or simply the people who talk to each other.
It is therefore important to build your network, Landman says.
For decades the Wieses, Moutons, Ruperts, Bekkers and Joostes did exactly that. They served on each other’s boards, they invested in each other’s companies, they grew (and still grow) wealth and built their global portfolios, they listed locally and abroad, moved their companies around and used (or still use) all sorts of corporate tricks to pay less, if any, tax.
More interesting is that they had the support of the mighty Naspers. They owned the media - their company results and corporate pictures were published on front pages of the Afrikaner-owned newspapers.
This is a dangerous and powerful force. I’ve seen how the power of “owning the media” made people rich. Very rich. I’ve also experienced how the very same powerful media house(s) used (almost abused) this “power” to discredit those that dare to fly in their sky.
This is not only a local phenomenon, it happens all around the globe.
At the end of the day, newspapers signal messages to the most vulnerable: the people that belief that the words printed in newspapers are true. Readers trust the printed word, now more than ever; social media allows every person to express their views, tweeting became part of every chief executive, politician and journalist’s KPIs. Donald Trump is but one example. He won an election using social media as a platform, promising Americans a better US.
Since I was appointed as editor of Business Report (BR) almost two years ago, I published various articles and editorial columns. I was fearless, excited and honoured to be trusted with such an important mission. BR is South Africa’s biggest daily financial publication - we “speak” to more than two million readers per day via the various Independent Media platforms. Powerful, but dangerous.
I was discredited and portrayed as Iqbal Survé’s this and that. At some point, I asked my chairperson: Doc, what lies beneath this onslaught on you? He simply asked me to ignore the onslaughts by Tiso Blackstar and bring out the best BR, to focus on articles that will empower those previously deprived of an opportunity to start a business and to create wealth.
But a sort of a media war broke out the moment Independent announced that we will be listing Sagarmatha, and Independent Media will be listed on the JSE. Why, I have to ask. All of a sudden, each and every company that Survé started was discredited.
Many, very many, articles appeared in Business Day, Business Times, Biznews, AmaBhungane, Daily Maverick and others, writing the same crap day after day. I fought back, because I knew that all they want is to take over Independent. They went so far as to discredit the one person that fought against the Guptas, Dr Daniel Matjila.
Media pie
As you know, the PIC invested in Independent and for the first time in the history of South Africa, black people also owned a piece of the media pie. Ouch.
The vultures didn’t like this. Who is this new player in the mighty media sky? Reality is that this humble South African grew up poor. He sold newspapers on street corners and saved to pay for his education, and qualified as a medical doctor. Christo Wiese also grew up poor, Markus Jooste also - apparently his father worked at the Post Office and enjoyed playing the horses “the office where he worked was close to the Tattersalls, a place where people bet on horses”, he said in an interview.
Now, Jooste aligned himself with Christo Wiese, Whitey Basson and Jannie Mouton. James-Brent Styan wrote: “Jooste does it seagull style: he earned this name not by virtue of his free-flying nature, but rather as a result of his uncompromising executive style. Jooste was the seagull, because he would fly in, shit all over his executives and then fly out.”
Where am I going with this, I asked myself while writing another editor’s column, opening myself up for more criticism? Reality is, there is a new bird in the media sky, and the vultures don’t like it, at all. Why? What really lies beneath the constant attacks on people like Dr Iqbal Survé? A man that serves on global boards, a respected global businessman, a leader and a fighter for the rights of the poor?
Facts are that the Joostes, Wieses, Bassons and Moutons built their wealth and family trusts over many years.
People of South Africa trusted them, rightly so. I mean, they were profiled on the platforms of their friends in the media. And then, one day, another bird appeared in the sky: announcing that he bought Independent Media from the Irish. It was - and remains - a game changer.
CAPE TOWN - JP Landman, a political and economic analyst, says that if you have good contacts, you have a greater chance of achieving success in South Africa. Landman refers to this as social capital. James-Brent Styan, by now the well-known author of the Steinhoff book, explains that social capital is just the relationship, the trust or simply the people who talk to each other.
It is therefore important to build your network, Landman says.
For decades the Wieses, Moutons, Ruperts, Bekkers and Joostes did exactly that. They served on each other’s boards, they invested in each other’s companies, they grew (and still grow) wealth and built their global portfolios, they listed locally and abroad, moved their companies around and used (or still use) all sorts of corporate tricks to pay less, if any, tax.
More interesting is that they had the support of the mighty Naspers. They owned the media - their company results and corporate pictures were published on front pages of the Afrikaner-owned newspapers.
This is a dangerous and powerful force. I’ve seen how the power of “owning the media” made people rich. Very rich. I’ve also experienced how the very same powerful media house(s) used (almost abused) this “power” to discredit those that dare to fly in their sky.
This is not only a local phenomenon, it happens all around the globe.
At the end of the day, newspapers signal messages to the most vulnerable: the people that belief that the words printed in newspapers are true. Readers trust the printed word, now more than ever; social media allows every person to express their views, tweeting became part of every chief executive, politician and journalist’s KPIs. Donald Trump is but one example. He won an election using social media as a platform, promising Americans a better US.
Since I was appointed as editor of Business Report (BR) almost two years ago, I published various articles and editorial columns. I was fearless, excited and honoured to be trusted with such an important mission. BR is South Africa’s biggest daily financial publication - we “speak” to more than two million readers per day via the various Independent Media platforms. Powerful, but dangerous.
I was discredited and portrayed as Iqbal Survé’s this and that. At some point, I asked my chairperson: Doc, what lies beneath this onslaught on you? He simply asked me to ignore the onslaughts by Tiso Blackstar and bring out the best BR, to focus on articles that will empower those previously deprived of an opportunity to start a business and to create wealth.
But a sort of a media war broke out the moment Independent announced that we will be listing Sagarmatha, and Independent Media will be listed on the JSE. Why, I have to ask. All of a sudden, each and every company that Survé started was discredited.
Many, very many, articles appeared in Business Day, Business Times, Biznews, AmaBhungane, Daily Maverick and others, writing the same crap day after day. I fought back, because I knew that all they want is to take over Independent. They went so far as to discredit the one person that fought against the Guptas, Dr Daniel Matjila.
Media pie
As you know, the PIC invested in Independent and for the first time in the history of South Africa, black people also owned a piece of the media pie. Ouch.
The vultures didn’t like this. Who is this new player in the mighty media sky? Reality is that this humble South African grew up poor. He sold newspapers on street corners and saved to pay for his education, and qualified as a medical doctor. Christo Wiese also grew up poor, Markus Jooste also - apparently his father worked at the Post Office and enjoyed playing the horses “the office where he worked was close to the Tattersalls, a place where people bet on horses”, he said in an interview.
Now, Jooste aligned himself with Christo Wiese, Whitey Basson and Jannie Mouton. James-Brent Styan wrote: “Jooste does it seagull style: he earned this name not by virtue of his free-flying nature, but rather as a result of his uncompromising executive style. Jooste was the seagull, because he would fly in, shit all over his executives and then fly out.”
Where am I going with this, I asked myself while writing another editor’s column, opening myself up for more criticism? Reality is, there is a new bird in the media sky, and the vultures don’t like it, at all. Why? What really lies beneath the constant attacks on people like Dr Iqbal Survé? A man that serves on global boards, a respected global businessman, a leader and a fighter for the rights of the poor?
Facts are that the Joostes, Wieses, Bassons and Moutons built their wealth and family trusts over many years.
People of South Africa trusted them, rightly so. I mean, they were profiled on the platforms of their friends in the media. And then, one day, another bird appeared in the sky: announcing that he bought Independent Media from the Irish. It was - and remains - a game changer.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82503
- Thanks: 6458
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months ago
Gaye Davis | about 2 hours ago
CAPE TOWN - Steinhoff’s former chief financial officer Ben la Grange has told Parliament he’s sorry about the money lost through the collapse of the company’s share price and says he doesn’t think he deliberately did anything wrong.
La Grange has been testifying before four parliamentary committees after he was subpoenaed to come and answer parliamentarians’ questions.
La Grange stepped down as CFO in January.
He says the losses suffered by pension funds is likely to be permanent as he doubts Steinhoff’s share price will ever return to what it was before the collapse.
Flanked by his senior counsel, John Dickerson, Le Grange first made a statement: “I’m deeply saddened with the events that happened at Steinhoff and all the money that was lost, like most people involved in trying to save this business. I also do not think I did anything deliberately wrong.”
La Grange has painted a picture of a complexed, global group with hundreds of subsidiary companies and multiple layers of reporting.
La Grange says there was no single audit firm that was responsible for checking out the entire group, and that this allowed for things to slip through without being picked up.
La Grange says several transactions that appeared to be valid, later turned out to have been done by third parties, who were apparently influenced by former Steinhoff CEO Markus Jooste.
WATCH: Parly committee progress report on Steinhoff probe
ewn.co.za/2018/08/29/ben-la-grange-sorry...h-steinhoff-collapse
CAPE TOWN - Steinhoff’s former chief financial officer Ben la Grange has told Parliament he’s sorry about the money lost through the collapse of the company’s share price and says he doesn’t think he deliberately did anything wrong.
La Grange has been testifying before four parliamentary committees after he was subpoenaed to come and answer parliamentarians’ questions.
La Grange stepped down as CFO in January.
He says the losses suffered by pension funds is likely to be permanent as he doubts Steinhoff’s share price will ever return to what it was before the collapse.
Flanked by his senior counsel, John Dickerson, Le Grange first made a statement: “I’m deeply saddened with the events that happened at Steinhoff and all the money that was lost, like most people involved in trying to save this business. I also do not think I did anything deliberately wrong.”
La Grange has painted a picture of a complexed, global group with hundreds of subsidiary companies and multiple layers of reporting.
La Grange says there was no single audit firm that was responsible for checking out the entire group, and that this allowed for things to slip through without being picked up.
La Grange says several transactions that appeared to be valid, later turned out to have been done by third parties, who were apparently influenced by former Steinhoff CEO Markus Jooste.
WATCH: Parly committee progress report on Steinhoff probe
ewn.co.za/2018/08/29/ben-la-grange-sorry...h-steinhoff-collapse
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jim
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 360
- Thanks: 90
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months ago
well its nearly time
after 10 am headlines on 403 i think
after 10 am headlines on 403 i think
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TNaicker
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6803
- Thanks: 2221
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months agojim wrote: well its nearly time
after 10 am headlines on 403 i think
MJ currently on 403...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TNaicker
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6803
- Thanks: 2221
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months ago
The member's of the committees have not done their homework...and MJ is kicking for touch at every opportunity...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TNaicker
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6803
- Thanks: 2221
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months ago
MJ has bat and pad together and no way through his defence...like the blockathons that Faff and AB and Amla engaged in a few times...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Muhtiman
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8932
- Thanks: 1014
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months ago
......no squeaky bum time.....he is looking squeaky clean....but is under eminence restraint in not to do the seagull thing......and sh!t all over those inept unprepared questioners......we all know he sent an SMS
....yet they refer to it as e-mail or whatsapp......:S
....also am I hearing correctly that he is blaming(or blame shifting)the Andreas Seifret partnership .....:huh:....where now Steinhoff have only in the last few days have settled....
....yet they refer to it as e-mail or whatsapp......:S
....also am I hearing correctly that he is blaming(or blame shifting)the Andreas Seifret partnership .....:huh:....where now Steinhoff have only in the last few days have settled....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TNaicker
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6803
- Thanks: 2221
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months ago
Anyone else out there watching this? Your views on the questions being asked?
To me, it is indicative of a lack of preparation and / or understanding...MJ has mentioned a few times that info obtained by partner was sent to German authorities and the investigations lead to delay in finalising AFS which would have made investors and lenders nervous and lead to share price collapse...you have auditors that don't want to sign off AFS until another investigation is conducted and that will further delay AFS that investors and lenders would want to assess payment terms of funding already granted or to extend further credit...and it seems that Steinhoff was leveraged to the hilt in its acquisition strategy and needed lines of credit to operate...
To me, it is indicative of a lack of preparation and / or understanding...MJ has mentioned a few times that info obtained by partner was sent to German authorities and the investigations lead to delay in finalising AFS which would have made investors and lenders nervous and lead to share price collapse...you have auditors that don't want to sign off AFS until another investigation is conducted and that will further delay AFS that investors and lenders would want to assess payment terms of funding already granted or to extend further credit...and it seems that Steinhoff was leveraged to the hilt in its acquisition strategy and needed lines of credit to operate...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Muhtiman
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8932
- Thanks: 1014
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months ago
.....either way the over inflated share price was bound to implode.....there must have been a Machiavellian plan for Jooste to pull the plug by resigning instead of further investigative probes to delay the financials......by bringing it all down....it will take years to sift through the rubble of Steinhoff to find the real reasons.....the timing of this Steinhoff settlement with Seifert and the hearings of today are far too coincidental....Jooste is a master card player....and has played this Seifert card at the most opportune moment to have investigations go in a very different direction.....bet that the Seifert matter was never in play when he sent the SMS about his wrong doing....now it is woven into his defense in the 11th hour.....a master stroke of epic proportions.....:huh:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Muhtiman
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8932
- Thanks: 1014
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months ago
DURBAN – Troubled retailer Steinhoff International has agreed to sell its 50 percent stake in Poco furniture for €270.69 million (R4.65 billion) to Seifert Entities to settle a legal dispute.
The group had initially agreed in principle on April 26 to sell to its former business partner Dr Andreas Seifert of the Seifert Entities.
In February, Steinhoff was dealt a major blow when the Enterprise Chamber of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal ordered that it must amend its 2016 financial statements to say it owned only half, not all, of Poco, and that Seifert owned the other half. This was after Steinhoff’s 2016 accounts were prepared on the basis that the group owned 100 percent of Poco.
......here we are talking about this little accounting irregularity......:dry:
The group had initially agreed in principle on April 26 to sell to its former business partner Dr Andreas Seifert of the Seifert Entities.
In February, Steinhoff was dealt a major blow when the Enterprise Chamber of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal ordered that it must amend its 2016 financial statements to say it owned only half, not all, of Poco, and that Seifert owned the other half. This was after Steinhoff’s 2016 accounts were prepared on the basis that the group owned 100 percent of Poco.
......here we are talking about this little accounting irregularity......:dry:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TNaicker
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6803
- Thanks: 2221
Re: Steinhoff leaks
6 years 9 months ago
MJ must be having a silent chuckle at how well that went for him...
The following user(s) said Thank You: mr hawaii
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.126 seconds