Lionel wrote:
bayern wrote:
Lionel wrote: As clear as mud....
[hr]
You are English speaking Lionel?
After 2 years of high level investigations by people that openly detest the man, they cannot say that a crime "wasn't" committed re obstruction.
I thought that a prosecutor had to prove that a crime "was committed. But, what do I know...
The dems will go for impeachment...which will be unsuccessful.
"If we had confidence that the President did not commit a crime, we would have said so", that's from Mueller himself. The Law does not permit Mueller to make a call on charging a sitting President, that is up to Congress. A crime doesn't have to be committed to prove obstruction of justice, it's the intent that matters e.g. Trump ordered Don McGhan to fire Mueller to stop the investigation, which McGhan refused to do, and then resigned as his personal lawyer. The person in charge of the investigation is actually a Republican and doesn't detest Trump at all.
The problem Lionel is that most Republicans have not read the report, their minds were made up by the AG's narrative in his summary wherein HE stated, " No collusion and No Obstruction of Justice". He couldn't be further from the truth if he tried. Regards impeachment, the Republicans are too afraid to break rank to protect their own positions, they are afraid to speak out against Trump. It will all come out in the wash.
Let's see how this plays out.
