USA next President Donald or Joe?

This is what the Right is listening to and YMCA, to drive their message home :-



I can post what i want, because that is exactly what the Right is posting.

Disgruntled Trump supporter are in the process of a lunch time protest in Washington, so what does he do, he orders his driver and the secret service to form a motor cavalcade and drive to the protesters urging them on. The sooner they throw the squatter out the better

Let logic prevail, Hell's f@#!cking Teeth. Ask the account to help you Lionel, you are flogging a dead horse here. Let's promise each other, no more posts on this thread until the 21/01/2021, let's be adult about this,. call Magi if you want, i think Trump supporters are deluded, prove me wrong on or after this date.

I'm not sure what I'm supposedly deluded about Bayern.

I support Trump.
I think the democratic policies destroyed the world.
I think they are in bed with the CCP.
Trump and his team believe that there were unlawful practices happening during the election.
The constitution allows for them contesting it.
They are contesting it.
I support his right to be afforded the opportunity to contest it.

I'm not saying that he will definitely win, if he contests it.

In horse racing, not every objection is upheld. But a part has a right to object.

Lionel wrote: I'm not sure what I'm supposedly deluded about Bayern.

I support Trump.
I think the democratic policies destroyed the world.
I think they are in bed with the CCP.
Trump and his team believe that there were unlawful practices happening during the election.
The constitution allows for them contesting it.
They are contesting it.
I support his right to be afforded the opportunity to contest it.

I'm not saying that he will definitely win, if he contests it.

In horse racing, not every objection is upheld. But a part has a right to object.

I agree 100% with Lionel .... I am flabbergasted with the success and extent of yhe brainwashing that tje Democrats and their controlled MSM has had in society.

Even here on ABC facts mean nothing, only emotive statements are felt and absorbed. Critical thinking has been replaced by targeted search engine results feeding the message they want you to believe.

....sandal wearing ....baseball bat wielding.... bowls playing.... wine swilling....and hung over.....does that not qualify 100% as a full blown Trump supporter......:lol:

.....but a crypto currency investor.....maybe a secret democrat.....:whistle:

Lionel wrote: I'm not sure what I'm supposedly deluded about Bayern.

I support Trump.
I think the democratic policies destroyed the world.
I think they are in bed with the CCP.
Trump and his team believe that there were unlawful practices happening during the election.
The constitution allows for them contesting it.
They are contesting it.
I support his right to be afforded the opportunity to contest it.

I'm not saying that he will definitely win, if he contests it.

In horse racing, not every objection is upheld. But a part has a right to object.

Lionel, how many recounts should take place, and in which States? In order to invalidate the result, a State like Pennsylvania should be recounted, provided it falls within the margin victory of 0.5% or less, to solve this argument once an for all. As of Friday, the Biden lead was sitting at 0.9% or about 60 000 votes more than Trump. Here's where the deluded view comes in - how many votes would you need to overturn this result, it's got to be simple arithmetic. I don't believe you will find that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general. This is a mathematical certainty, Pennsylvania will not go RED, and Trump and his supporters are deluded thinking it will.

FFS magi, give it a rest and move on, you lost

no matter what the clever tipster fellas here say, all the calculations and what not - there is still 8/100 (in hundreds of thousands of pounds) available on the exchanges for biden to be the next president
instead of been internet bullies organise second and third bonds to PUT - fill yer boots! or not

bayern wrote:

Lionel wrote: I'm not sure what I'm supposedly deluded about Bayern.

I support Trump.
I think the democratic policies destroyed the world.
I think they are in bed with the CCP.
Trump and his team believe that there were unlawful practices happening during the election.
The constitution allows for them contesting it.
They are contesting it.
I support his right to be afforded the opportunity to contest it.

I'm not saying that he will definitely win, if he contests it.

In horse racing, not every objection is upheld. But a part has a right to object.

Lionel, how many recounts should take place, and in which States? In order to invalidate the result, a State like Pennsylvania should be recounted, provided it falls within the margin victory of 0.5% or less, to solve this argument once an for all. As of Friday, the Biden lead was sitting at 0.9% or about 60 000 votes more than Trump. Here's where the deluded view comes in - how many votes would you need to overturn this result, it's got to be simple arithmetic. I don't believe you will find that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general. This is a mathematical certainty, Pennsylvania will not go RED, and Trump and his supporters are deluded thinking it will.

Bayern, you are beginning to concern me. Please read my post again. This is not about solving any arguments.
This is about challenging the integrity of the elections.

Question 1: Did fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 2: Where did the fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 3: What impact did the fraudulent activities have on the elections? Depending on the judgements in question 1 & 2, and the resultant corrective action, this is still to be determined.

You say that "you don't believe that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general".

What tangible evidence is this statement based on? Please state facts in your answer, not feelings.

Today, at Greyville, there are 9 races carded.


Which jockeys are allowed to lodge an objection?
When is a jockey allowed to lodge an objection?
How many objections are allowed for the entire meeting?
How many times can a jockey lodge an objection in a meeting?
Is a jockey discriminated against when lodging an objection?

And most importantly....

Can the other jockeys (and their supporters) object, to a jockey lodging an objection?

Let's see the mindset of the people we are dealing with here....once and for all!

Lionel wrote: Today, at Greyville, there are 9 races carded.


Which jockeys are allowed to lodge an objection?
When is a jockey allowed to lodge an objection?
How many objections are allowed for the entire meeting?
How many times can a jockey lodge an objection in a meeting?
Is a jockey discriminated against when lodging an objection?

And most importantly....

Can the other jockeys (and their supporters) object, to a jockey lodging an objection?

Let's see the mindset of the people we are dealing with here....once and for all!

Well there is a rule - (unlike in the USA law where you can litigate for any reason) - If you lodge an objection without MERIT OR PROOF( the 9 or so cases already thrown out in the Usa show that) and it is regarded as frivolous or without merit you forfeit your deposit - So feel free to lodge an objection today because your horse was winning at the 800m mark and then was passed and ended up last - Let's take a bet and see how many objections like this we will see today or maybe this decade - I say NIL -