USA next President Donald or Joe?

Lionel wrote:

bayern wrote:

Lionel wrote: I'm not sure what I'm supposedly deluded about Bayern.

I support Trump.
I think the democratic policies destroyed the world.
I think they are in bed with the CCP.
Trump and his team believe that there were unlawful practices happening during the election.
The constitution allows for them contesting it.
They are contesting it.
I support his right to be afforded the opportunity to contest it.

I'm not saying that he will definitely win, if he contests it.

In horse racing, not every objection is upheld. But a part has a right to object.

Lionel, how many recounts should take place, and in which States? In order to invalidate the result, a State like Pennsylvania should be recounted, provided it falls within the margin victory of 0.5% or less, to solve this argument once an for all. As of Friday, the Biden lead was sitting at 0.9% or about 60 000 votes more than Trump. Here's where the deluded view comes in - how many votes would you need to overturn this result, it's got to be simple arithmetic. I don't believe you will find that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general. This is a mathematical certainty, Pennsylvania will not go RED, and Trump and his supporters are deluded thinking it will.

Bayern, you are beginning to concern me. Please read my post again. This is not about solving any arguments.
This is about challenging the integrity of the elections.

Question 1: Did fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 2: Where did the fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 3: What impact did the fraudulent activities have on the elections? Depending on the judgements in question 1 & 2, and the resultant corrective action, this is still to be determined.

You say that "you don't believe that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general".

What tangible evidence is this statement based on? Please state facts in your answer, not feelings.

Lionel wrote:

bayern wrote:

Lionel wrote: I'm not sure what I'm supposedly deluded about Bayern.

I support Trump.
I think the democratic policies destroyed the world.
I think they are in bed with the CCP.
Trump and his team believe that there were unlawful practices happening during the election.
The constitution allows for them contesting it.
They are contesting it.
I support his right to be afforded the opportunity to contest it.

I'm not saying that he will definitely win, if he contests it.

In horse racing, not every objection is upheld. But a part has a right to object.

Lionel, how many recounts should take place, and in which States? In order to invalidate the result, a State like Pennsylvania should be recounted, provided it falls within the margin victory of 0.5% or less, to solve this argument once an for all. As of Friday, the Biden lead was sitting at 0.9% or about 60 000 votes more than Trump. Here's where the deluded view comes in - how many votes would you need to overturn this result, it's got to be simple arithmetic. I don't believe you will find that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general. This is a mathematical certainty, Pennsylvania will not go RED, and Trump and his supporters are deluded thinking it will.

Bayern, you are beginning to concern me. Please read my post again. This is not about solving any arguments.
This is about challenging the integrity of the elections.

Question 1: Did fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 2: Where did the fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 3: What impact did the fraudulent activities have on the elections? Depending on the judgements in question 1 & 2, and the resultant corrective action, this is still to be determined.

You say that "you don't believe that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general".

What tangible evidence is this statement based on? Please state facts in your answer, not feelings.

mr hawaii wrote:

Lionel wrote: Today, at Greyville, there are 9 races carded.


Which jockeys are allowed to lodge an objection?
When is a jockey allowed to lodge an objection?
How many objections are allowed for the entire meeting?
How many times can a jockey lodge an objection in a meeting?
Is a jockey discriminated against when lodging an objection?

And most importantly....

Can the other jockeys (and their supporters) object, to a jockey lodging an objection?

Let's see the mindset of the people we are dealing with here....once and for all!

Well there is a rule - (unlike in the USA law where you can litigate for any reason) - If you lodge an objection without MERIT OR PROOF( the 9 or so cases already thrown out in the Usa show that) and it is regarded as frivolous or without merit you forfeit your deposit - So feel free to lodge an objection today because your horse was winning at the 800m mark and then was passed and ended up last - Let's take a bet and see how many objections like this we will see today or maybe this decade - I say NIL -

mr hawaii wrote:

Lionel wrote:

bayern wrote:

Lionel wrote: I'm not sure what I'm supposedly deluded about Bayern.

I support Trump.
I think the democratic policies destroyed the world.
I think they are in bed with the CCP.
Trump and his team believe that there were unlawful practices happening during the election.
The constitution allows for them contesting it.
They are contesting it.
I support his right to be afforded the opportunity to contest it.

I'm not saying that he will definitely win, if he contests it.

In horse racing, not every objection is upheld. But a part has a right to object.

Lionel, how many recounts should take place, and in which States? In order to invalidate the result, a State like Pennsylvania should be recounted, provided it falls within the margin victory of 0.5% or less, to solve this argument once an for all. As of Friday, the Biden lead was sitting at 0.9% or about 60 000 votes more than Trump. Here's where the deluded view comes in - how many votes would you need to overturn this result, it's got to be simple arithmetic. I don't believe you will find that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general. This is a mathematical certainty, Pennsylvania will not go RED, and Trump and his supporters are deluded thinking it will.

Bayern, you are beginning to concern me. Please read my post again. This is not about solving any arguments.
This is about challenging the integrity of the elections.

Question 1: Did fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 2: Where did the fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 3: What impact did the fraudulent activities have on the elections? Depending on the judgements in question 1 & 2, and the resultant corrective action, this is still to be determined.

You say that "you don't believe that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general".

What tangible evidence is this statement based on? Please state facts in your answer, not feelings.

So only dead DEMOCRATS voted? And there is only fraud on one side? The red side is so clean - Just please provide PROOF of this fraud- The PROOF that was used in the failed 9 or so cases - Where is that proof?

bayern wrote:

Lionel wrote:

bayern wrote:

Lionel wrote: I'm not sure what I'm supposedly deluded about Bayern.

I support Trump.
I think the democratic policies destroyed the world.
I think they are in bed with the CCP.
Trump and his team believe that there were unlawful practices happening during the election.
The constitution allows for them contesting it.
They are contesting it.
I support his right to be afforded the opportunity to contest it.

I'm not saying that he will definitely win, if he contests it.

In horse racing, not every objection is upheld. But a part has a right to object.

Lionel, how many recounts should take place, and in which States? In order to invalidate the result, a State like Pennsylvania should be recounted, provided it falls within the margin victory of 0.5% or less, to solve this argument once an for all. As of Friday, the Biden lead was sitting at 0.9% or about 60 000 votes more than Trump. Here's where the deluded view comes in - how many votes would you need to overturn this result, it's got to be simple arithmetic. I don't believe you will find that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general. This is a mathematical certainty, Pennsylvania will not go RED, and Trump and his supporters are deluded thinking it will.

Bayern, you are beginning to concern me. Please read my post again. This is not about solving any arguments.
This is about challenging the integrity of the elections.

Question 1: Did fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 2: Where did the fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 3: What impact did the fraudulent activities have on the elections? Depending on the judgements in question 1 & 2, and the resultant corrective action, this is still to be determined.

You say that "you don't believe that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general".

What tangible evidence is this statement based on? Please state facts in your answer, not feelings.

Lionel, the Trump team are making the assertions, be it that dead people were found to have voted, or be it voter fraud. Anyone claiming the affirmative needs to provide the evidence. What they have found, a lady voted under her married name, but her husband is dead. Do you believe even if voter fraud is uncovered, it will be of a magnitude to reverse the result, that's my question. They should count all they want, i agree. Please what the attachments.

Lionel wrote: @Chicken, the person who is holding up that poster is sick. I denounce him.

Happy.

Lionel wrote:

mr hawaii wrote:

Lionel wrote:

bayern wrote:

Lionel wrote: I'm not sure what I'm supposedly deluded about Bayern.

I support Trump.
I think the democratic policies destroyed the world.
I think they are in bed with the CCP.
Trump and his team believe that there were unlawful practices happening during the election.
The constitution allows for them contesting it.
They are contesting it.
I support his right to be afforded the opportunity to contest it.

I'm not saying that he will definitely win, if he contests it.

In horse racing, not every objection is upheld. But a part has a right to object.

Lionel, how many recounts should take place, and in which States? In order to invalidate the result, a State like Pennsylvania should be recounted, provided it falls within the margin victory of 0.5% or less, to solve this argument once an for all. As of Friday, the Biden lead was sitting at 0.9% or about 60 000 votes more than Trump. Here's where the deluded view comes in - how many votes would you need to overturn this result, it's got to be simple arithmetic. I don't believe you will find that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general. This is a mathematical certainty, Pennsylvania will not go RED, and Trump and his supporters are deluded thinking it will.

Bayern, you are beginning to concern me. Please read my post again. This is not about solving any arguments.
This is about challenging the integrity of the elections.

Question 1: Did fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 2: Where did the fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 3: What impact did the fraudulent activities have on the elections? Depending on the judgements in question 1 & 2, and the resultant corrective action, this is still to be determined.

You say that "you don't believe that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general".

What tangible evidence is this statement based on? Please state facts in your answer, not feelings.

So only dead DEMOCRATS voted? And there is only fraud on one side? The red side is so clean - Just please provide PROOF of this fraud- The PROOF that was used in the failed 9 or so cases - Where is that proof?

I hope you are not asking me for the proof, Mr H. I have none. I am not the one lodging the objections.

chicken n chips wrote:

Lionel wrote: @Chicken, the person who is holding up that poster is sick. I denounce him.

Happy.

Unfortunatel he is just one of 10s of millions aided and abetted by Trump

mr hawaii wrote:

Lionel wrote:

mr hawaii wrote:

Lionel wrote:

bayern wrote:

Lionel wrote: I'm not sure what I'm supposedly deluded about Bayern.

I support Trump.
I think the democratic policies destroyed the world.
I think they are in bed with the CCP.
Trump and his team believe that there were unlawful practices happening during the election.
The constitution allows for them contesting it.
They are contesting it.
I support his right to be afforded the opportunity to contest it.

I'm not saying that he will definitely win, if he contests it.

In horse racing, not every objection is upheld. But a part has a right to object.

Lionel, how many recounts should take place, and in which States? In order to invalidate the result, a State like Pennsylvania should be recounted, provided it falls within the margin victory of 0.5% or less, to solve this argument once an for all. As of Friday, the Biden lead was sitting at 0.9% or about 60 000 votes more than Trump. Here's where the deluded view comes in - how many votes would you need to overturn this result, it's got to be simple arithmetic. I don't believe you will find that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general. This is a mathematical certainty, Pennsylvania will not go RED, and Trump and his supporters are deluded thinking it will.

Bayern, you are beginning to concern me. Please read my post again. This is not about solving any arguments.
This is about challenging the integrity of the elections.

Question 1: Did fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 2: Where did the fraud take place? Trumps team to provide evidence. Courts to adjudicate.
Question 3: What impact did the fraudulent activities have on the elections? Depending on the judgements in question 1 & 2, and the resultant corrective action, this is still to be determined.

You say that "you don't believe that many "dead people voted", and or voter fraud of that magnitude in general".

What tangible evidence is this statement based on? Please state facts in your answer, not feelings.

So only dead DEMOCRATS voted? And there is only fraud on one side? The red side is so clean - Just please provide PROOF of this fraud- The PROOF that was used in the failed 9 or so cases - Where is that proof?

I hope you are not asking me for the proof, Mr H. I have none. I am not the one lodging the objections.

It is such a pity your man and his Mayor also have no proof - You know many years ago I realized that trying to bend spoons with your mind just does not work!! I wonder when that very very bad loser will get that msg!!!