TheWorlds top chokers at it again

Yes why did he take off Peterson after bowling 4 fantastic overs? We could have had them all out for 120 (but we would still have lost) Who are these Van Wyk and Du Plessis? Why they in the team. If England were chasing 171 they would have won with ease.

Instead he had to help his team reach the pro 20 finals.....SA sport is a joke in general for me.

.....Still, lying in bed watching SA racing and SA cricket while in Las Vegas baby.....WINNING!!!!! - Thank you Charlie Sheen

gregbucks Wrote:

---

> The only player thats isn't a choker has been left
> at home, BOUCHER.... He would of seen it through
> imo:)


yep you right. Its a wonder that they never choose that van der merwe joker in the squad.

chicken 'n chips Wrote:

---

> Yes why did he take off Peterson after bowling 4
> fantastic overs? We could have had them all oute
> for 120 (but we would still have lost) Who are
> these Van Wyk and Du Plessis? Why they in the
> team. If England were chasing 171 they would have
> won with ease.

Its part of the quota system, you need some Afrikaans boys in the side....

Joking.... Van Wyk is from the Vrystaat been around in the provincial set up for a while, Du Plessis had a good season which got him selected, but he looked all at sea with spin bowling....

Well there is always the rugby world cup in September. The All Blacks are the chokers when it comes to rugby so it will be a 3rd world cup for the bokke (so long as they dont select any Lions players)

no one is choking.....gotta worry when coaches have laptops open and stare unflinching at it.....some very nice book making sites and mentioned on this thread on the betting turnover in this game alone.....just the minds ticking over counting the lolly.....cricket is worse than horse racing....:S

Muhtiman Wrote:

---

> no one is choking.....gotta worry when coaches
> have laptops open and stare unflinching at
> it.....some very nice book making sites and
> mentioned on this thread on the betting turnover
> in this game alone.....just the minds ticking over
> counting the lolly.....cricket is worse than horse
> racing....:S

Yes can imagine the advantage with that much liquidity being at the stadium with time delay advantage a few serious punts at the death.

Att Scotia.
England 75/1 at one stage.
To cover myself was I suppose to take at bet at least 20R to draw even for I had quite a big bet on SA.
Please advice for I am sick of loosing as if my betting is the reason for the underdogs doing so well.
What to do to cover myself will be my question.

Seems to me that not one of you guys can sit fown and watch a game without having a bet on it. Shame.

Maybe Smith is doing a Hansie and is raking in the bucks with the bookies.

For your info did not have a bet on the game was just watching the betting moves, and they were huge.

Frank would suggest if you have? 1000/1000 on any event and your team goes 1/50 and the other team goes 40/1 you should put 25 on the outsider, then you will either break even or win 975

Note this is just an example!

good punting

This is probably the best thing that could have happened to the Protea's. They will still qualify comfortably but the last thing we need it to go unbeaten into the quarters without having a tough game. The biggest problem the Protea's have is their inexperienced middle order and long tail. We have one of the best all round bowling attacks in the competition along with Sri Lanka and we will still go close to winning the World Cup. I am still 100% behind the Protea's and wil support you all the way win or lose. GO PROTEA'S.