Hollywood not paying out a WINNING bet

chicken n chips wrote: Quite right but at the end of the day they are added to the rus scored by batsman giving you a total amount of runs scored. At the moment SA are 85/0 which it states on the screen one of which is an extra. So going by what you said the score should be 84/0 and that extra run should only be classified as a run at the end of the inning. How many times have you heard the commentator say and the top score was extras.

MasterOfMyFate wrote: Extras ARE runs - they're just added to the total score separately. The total score is made up of runs whereby a batsmen hits the ball. Extras are the exact opposite of this - any event where the batsmen does not hit the ball with his bat.

chicken n chips wrote: So how come a wide and a no ball not only go into the extras column but also go against the bowlers name yet a bye and a leg bye only go into the extras column?

chicken n chips wrote: Quite right but at the end of the day they are added to the rus scored by batsman giving you a total amount of runs scored. At the moment SA are 85/0 which it states on the screen one of which is an extra. So going by what you said the score should be 84/0 and that extra run should only be classified as a run at the end of the inning. How many times have you heard the commentator say and the top score was extras.

MasterOfMyFate wrote: Wait...so the ball hits the pad - it's a leg-bye, the batsmen RUN. Do you know what that's called? A run. How can it be called a 'score' :lol: the only thing that's the SCORE is the cumulative runs total(normal runs AND extras). I didn't check up any ICC rules/regulations but in colloquial terms there are a number of ways to score runs and they include wides, no-balls etc - EXTRAS.

Countrymember wrote:

chicken n chips wrote: So how come a wide and a no ball not only go into the extras column but also go against the bowlers name yet a bye and a leg bye only go into the extras column?

Because they are deemed to be a bowlers fault.........byes and leg byes are deemed to be the wicketkeepers fault, but doesn't have any figures to penalize..

P.S. I think this argument is totally irrelevant to the original argument.....

MasterOfMyFate wrote: Wait...so the ball hits the pad - it's a leg-bye, the batsmen RUN. Do you know what that's called? A run. How can it be called a 'score' :lol: the only thing that's the SCORE is the cumulative runs total(normal runs AND extras). I didn't check up any ICC rules/regulations but in colloquial terms there are a number of ways to score runs and they include wides, no-balls etc - EXTRAS.