I have a private forum set up

one thing that is fairly certain - You will never get RA or Phumelela employees posting with their real names because once you have made a statement or answered a question on the forum you cannot remove it and you have to stick to what you've said so without their participation (other than ghost reading which they DO no matter what they say) I'm not sure what the new look forum would offer? Perhaps more trainers and Jockeys would post - I don't know if that would happen either but either way I have nothing to hide

Mr H

correct, the trainers that want to engage already do. the ones that don't WONT.

Mazaltoff to

eudey
goosen
shams

they engage with the public inspite of some of the bollocks written. the others dont want to be asked questions so they will never post

......if you don't like the way racing is run......then stay the f@ck out.....FFS I wish it was that easy......:

Frodo,thats the problem ,we keep getting asked for member details and i obv deny the requests,then we get threatened with interdicts,then i end up closing threads like the visser thread ,to protect the site and members..

easy Wrote:

---

> Mr H
>
> correct, the trainers that want to engage already
> do. the ones that don't WONT.
>
> Mazaltoff to
>
> eudey
> goosen
> shams
>
> they engage with the public inspite of some of the
> bollocks written. the others dont want to be asked
> questions so they will never post

There are many many more trainers posting on the site,and the reason they post is because they remain anom.

They also are faird of their landlords

hibernia Wrote:

---

> easy Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Mr H
> >
> > correct, the trainers that want to engage
> already
> > do. the ones that don't WONT.
> >
> > Mazaltoff to
> >
> > eudey
> > goosen
> > shams
> >
> > they engage with the public inspite of some of
> the
> > bollocks written. the others dont want to be
> asked
> > questions so they will never post
>
> There are many many more trainers posting on the
> site,and the reason they post is because they
> remain anom.
>
> They also are faird of their landlords

100% -

I will still post in the present form and if I have a problem I will just chat to Bob. I do know that as Titch said, more of the "inner circle" would post if they knew who was at the other end.

Easy ,sometimes mate your logic kind of gets lost on me!

Your examples of why not to post in real name.but..................Steve Reid posted as Catsmug, Brett Masselle posted as Troubleshooter and Charl Pretorius posted as Freeracer ................So what's your point?????

Their situation arose because there were not enough of us who had the balls to stand with them when the heat was on!!

Ironically,I am a member of the NHA and you will know that I have been as challenging as anything those guys got charged with and have expected to get called to an enquiry.Why haven't I................I post in my own name!!..............I am happy to face their charges!

rob faux Wrote:

---

>
> Their situation arose because there were not
> enough of us who had the balls to stand with them
> when the heat was on!!


(tu)(tu)(tu)(tu)(tu)

There are "forums" for opinions in racing where you have to pitch up and speak up.... And almost nobody does! RA annual meeting a fine example.... Ask why this is the case and then tell me why this proposed forum would be any different ?

@teamwildracing Wrote:

---

> There are "forums" for opinions in racing where
> you have to pitch up and speak up.... And almost
> nobody does! RA annual meeting a fine example....
> Ask why this is the case and then tell me why this
> proposed forum would be any different ?


For starters you have to be a member..........am not and will not be a member of the RA and pointless attending the NHA annual meeting....it is not open to items suggested from the floor!

True Rob.... "Pointless" ... True again ...."not open to items suggested from the floor" nail head, will be same here, but like englander I say give it a try, I'll be attending but hold out for more of the same.